по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Legal information > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

В погоне за двумя зайцами поймай обоих сразу!
34 журнала издательства NOTA BENE входят одновременно и в ERIH PLUS, и в перечень изданий ВАК
При необходимости автору может быть предоставлена услуга срочной или сверхсрочной публикации!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
On value, dignity, and honor: logics of the notions
Liksunova Anna

External doctoral candidate, the department of Philosophy, Chelyabinsk State University

457100, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Zashchitnikov Moskvy, 103

lady_liksynova@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Taradanov Aleksandr Ardalionovich

Doctor of Sociology

Docent, the department of Sociology and Social Work, Chelyabinsk State University

454021, Russia, Chelyabinsk, Molodogvardeytsev Street 70, office #B

taradanov@csu.ru

Abstract.

 
Values are the extremely important components of human culture; they define the past, present, and future of the entire humanity. The existing system of values determine and regulate all human activity. The analysis of any system of values demonstrates that human dignity prioritizes over the other values, because human attempts to cognize and manifest his individual value, his personal dignity. The notion of dignity virtually always is views in connection with the notion of honor. At times, dignity is replaced by honor, or vice versa.  The opinions exists that honor is dignity. However, in all activeness of the use of the notion of value within the socio-humanitarian discourse, the categorical definition of the value in literature is yet to be formulated. Namely the uncertainty, tension, ambiguity, and correlation between the social and personal aspects of the notion of “honor” make its role socially so inconsistent. In the result, honor always has a specific historical content, which varies due to the changes in the corporate norm and “sovereign”. The scientific novelty is associated with the fact that the area of values is defined within the boundaries of the virtue and vice; at the same time, the virtue is defines as harmony – measure between the good and evil, while the vice is disharmony (the extreme of one or another).

Keywords: evil, good, freedom, benefit, virtue, honor, dignity, anti-value, value, debt

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2016.12.2121

Article was received:

03-12-2016


Review date:

27-11-2016


Publish date:

15-01-2017


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Apresyan R.G., Guseinov A.A. Etika: Uchebnik dlya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. M.: Gardarika, 1998–2004. 478 s.
2.
Apresyan R.G. Etika: novye starye problemy. K shestidesya¬tiletiyu Abdusalama Abdulkerimovicha Guseinova / Otv. red. R.G. Apresyan. M.: Gardariki, 1999. 256 s.
3.
Aristotel'. Sochineniya: V 4-kh t. T. 4 / Per. s drevnegrech. M.: Mysl', 1983. 830 s.
4.
Berdyaev N.A. Filosofiya svobody // Filosofiya svobody. Smysl tvorchestva. M., 1989. 298 s.
5.
Vitruk N.V., Pridvorov N.A. Dostoinstvo lichnosti i sotsialisticheskoe pravo. M.: «Yuridicheskaya literatura», 1977. 136 s.
6.
Gessen S.I. Osnovy pedagogiki. Vvedenie v prikladnuyu filosofiyu. M.: «Shkola-Press», 1995. 448 s.
7.
Kant I. Sochineniya v shesti tomakh. M.: «Mysl'», 1965. (Filosof. nasledie). T. 4. Ch. 2. 478 s.
8.
Kant I. Entsiklopediya mysli / Sost. N. Khoromin. Khar'kov: «Prapor», 2001. 129 s.
9.
Kollmann N.Sh. Soedinennye chest'yu. Gosudarstvo i obshchestvo v Rossii rannego novogo vremeni. M.: «Drevnekhranilishche», 2001. 389 s.
10.
Lottse G. Osnovaniya prakticheskoi filosofii. SPb., 1882. 87 s.
11.
Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya: v 4 t. / In-t filosofii Rossiiskoi akad. nauk; Gl. red. V.S. Stepin. T. 1. M.: «Mysl'», 2003. 774 s.
12.
Pridvorov N.A. Dostoinstvo lichnosti i sotsialisticheskoe pravo. M.: «Yuridicheskaya literatura», 1977. 136 s.
13.
Taradanov A.A. Logika sotsial'nogo II: genezis idei // Geneticheskaya sotsiologiya XXI. 2016. № 2. S. 71.
14.
Filosofskii entsiklopedicheskii slovar' / Pod red. S.S. Averintseva. M.: Sovetskaya entsiklopediya, 1989. 723 s.
15.
Shokhin, V.K. Filosofiya tsennostei i rannyaya aksiologicheskaya mysl': monografiya / V.K. Shokhin. M.: Izd-vo RUDN, 2006. 235 s.
16.
Shreider Yu.A. Etika. M.: Tekst, 1998. 272 s.
17.
Entsiklopediya mysli / Sost. N. Khoromin. Khar'kov: «Prapor», 2001. 129 s.
18.
Yum D. Sochineniya. V 2-kh t. T. l. M.: «Mysl'», 1966. 674 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website