по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Substantive limitations of ideologies of the industrial era
Gizha Andrew Vladimirovich

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Philosophy, Donetsk National Technical University

83120, Ukraine, Donetskaya oblast', g. Donetsk, ul. N. Ostrovskogo, 26, kv. 55

andry@vnet.dn.ua
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

 
This article analyzes the state of ideological sphere of public consciousness. It is dedicated to identification of the inner extended logics of (self-) development of the concept of ideology in terms of its own interpretation, self-reflection, and practice of utmost transitions. The latter means the analysis of historicity of the indicated phenomenon, which underlines that the time of development of effective functionality of the basic large-scale ideological programs is exhausted as a result of completeness of their ontological grounds in form of historical period of industrialization and classical industrial development. The following conclusions were made: formulation of historical genesis of ideology in the context of emergence and establishment of bourgeois relations; statement that ideology does not carry in itself the fatal falsehood; that it is substantial and possesses the quality of accomplished vicissitude; manifests as quasi-consciousness of the large system structures; it is a subjective-social form of comprehending the historical processes, imitational and private; ideologies are the form of public consciousness of the industrial societies and their timed completes naturally.
 

Keywords: criticism, forms of consciousness, individual, reality, imitation, vicissitude, concept of ideology, ideology, privacy of ideological consciousness, civilization

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8728.2017.12.20176

Article was received:

24-12-2016


Review date:

14-11-2016


Publish date:

05-01-2018


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Gizha A.V. Ideologiya kak metayazyk otchuzhdennogo individa // Nauka. Religiya. Obshchestvo. Donetsk, 2013. № 3. S. 35-41.
2.
Gizha A.V. Sotsial'no-znakovaya sut' ideologicheskoi formy soznaniya. Znanie. Ponimanie. Umenie. 2014 № 3. S. 94-102. URL: http://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/sotsialno-znakovaya-sut-ideologicheskoy-formy-soznaniya
3.
Marks K., Engel's F. Nemetskaya ideologiya // Sobr. soch., izd. 2, t. 3. M.: Politizdat, 1955. 689 s.
4.
Zhizhek S. Vozvyshennyi ob''ekt ideologii / Per. s angl. V. Sofronova. M.: Khudozhestvennyi zhurnal, 1999. 234 s.
5.
Loginov A.V. Ideologiya kak problema sotsial'noi ontologii / Dis. ... k. filos. n. 09.00.11 (sotsial'naya filosofiya). Ekaterinburg, 2004. 18 s. URL: http://www.dslib.net/soc-filosofia/ideologija-kak-problema-socialnoj-ontologii.html#909882
6.
Popova I.M. Povsednevnye ideologii. Kak oni zhivut, menyayutsya, ischezayut. K.: In-t sotsiologii NANU, 2000. 219 s.
7.
Yarskaya-Smirnova E.R. Narrativnyi analiz v sotsiologii // Sotsiologicheskii zhurnal. 1997. № 3. S. 38-61.
8.
Gurevich P.S. Ideologizatsiya i deideologizatsiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. № 2. 2014. C. 155-161. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.2.10940.
9.
Vallerstain I. Konets znakomogo mira: Sotsiologiya XXI veka / Per. s angl. pod red. V.I. Inozemtseva. M.: Logos, 2004. 368 s.
10.
Dugin A. Chetvertaya politicheskaya teoriya. Rossiya i politicheskie idei KhKhI veka. SPb.: Amfora, 2009. 343 s.
11.
Zinov'ev A. Ideologiya partii budushchego. M.: Izdatel'stvo «Eksmo», 2003. 240 s.
12.
Dudnik S.I., Kamnev V.M. Postsovetskii marksizm: ideinoe svoeobrazie i perspektivy razvitiya // Vopr. filos. № 8. 2013. S. 66-73. URL: http://vphil.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=799&Itemid=52
13.
Mitchem K. Chto takoe filosofiya tekhniki? / Per. s angl. pod red. V.G. Gorokhova. M.: Aspekt Press, 1995. 149 s.
14.
Engel's F. Pis'mo Frantsu Meringu // Marks K., Engel's F. Soch. 2-e izd. M., 1966. T. 39. S. 82-86.
15.
Lyubodrag Simonovich. Prevzoidena li Marksovaya kritika kapitalizma? / URL: http://ljubodragsimonovic.wordpress.com/2014/01/27/ljubodrag-simonovic-priroda-marksove-kritike-kapitalizma/#more-2383.
16.
Satton E. Vlast' dollara. M.: «FERI-V», 2002. 97 s.
17.
Katasonov V. Yu. Kapitalizm. Istoriya i ideologiya «denezhnoi tsivilizatsii» / Nauch. red. O. A. Platonov. M.: Institut russkoi tsivilizatsii, 2013. 1072 s.
18.
Datsyuk S. Shcho robiti z moral'nimi urodami? // URL: http://blogs.pravda.com.ua/authors/datsuk/584fa4ffe671b/view_print/
19.
Dugin A. Vse ishchut vykhod // Delovaya gazeta «Vzglyad». 21.08. 2012. URL: http://vz.ru/opinions/2012/8/21/594425.html.
20.
Yakovleva E.L. Absurd v glamurnom sotsial'nom // Chelovek i kul'tura. 2016. № 3. C. 49-62. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8744.2016.3.18665. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/ca/article_18665.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website