по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Comparativist experience of development of the philosophical methodology of the study of Buddhism
Urbanaeva Irina Safronovna

Doctor of Philosophy

Chief Scientific Associate, Institute for Mongolian, Buddhist and Tibetan Studies of the Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences

670047, Russia, respublika Buryatiya, g. Ulan-Ude, ul. Sakh'yanovoi, 6

urbanaeva@imbt.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

 
The subject of this research is the comparativist experience of establishment of the philosophical approach towards examination of Buddhism within the framework of academic Buddhology and comparative philosophy. Special attention is given to the establishment of the philosophical methodology of the study of Budhism due to self-identification of the topic of comparative philosophy in broad and narrow sense, as well as analysis of the contribution of F. I. Scherbatsky and O. O. Rozenberg into substantiation of the philosophical Buddhology, reframing of the essence of theoretical-methodological principles of Rozenberg and the importance of his philosophical approach for understanding of the unity in multiplicity of Buddhism along with articulation of the problem of authentic Buddhism. Due to the strong influence of the works of F. I Scherbatsky, who took the Buddhist philosophy out the boundaries of Orientalism into the area of legitimate philosophy, and turned it into the discipline of historical-philosophical science, the greatest development in Russia and abroad received the comparative historical-philosophical research of the Buddhist and Western philosophy, aimed at the search of parallelisms between the specific doctrines. The philosophical methodology of the study of Buddhism in its establishment was tightly linked to the formation of the discipline of comparative philosophy in its broad and narrow sense – as the global trend of synthesis of the Eastern and Western philosophies, as well as the cross-cultural historical-philosophical research. The author concludes that the approach of O. O. Rozenberg corresponds with the Buddhological tradition formed by the Buryat scholars of Buddhism, which consists in complementing the academic opportunities by the resources of Buddhist wisdom in examination of Buddhism. Not just the knowledge of the original Buddhist texts and classical Hindu commentary literature, but also the reliance upon “living” tradition is necessary for establishment of the specific scientific methodology in the modern Buddhology.
 

Keywords: Buddhist wisdom, unity of the multiplicity of Buddhism, authentic Buddhism, parallels in the history of philosophy, cross-cultural studies, comparative philosopy, philosophical studies of Buddhism, system of Buddhism, philosophical synthesis, Western philosophy

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2016.8.19762

Article was received:

21-07-2016


Review date:

18-07-2016


Publish date:

31-08-2016


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Ermakova T.V. O.O. Rozenberg kak predstavitel' Sankt-Peterburgskoi buddologicheskoi shkoly // Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. 2008. T. 9. Vyp. I. SPb.: Izd-vo RKhGA, 2008. S. 7-18.
2.
Ignatovich A.N. O.O. Rozenberg i ego trudy po buddizmu // Rozenberg O.O. Trudy po buddizmu. M., 1991. S. 6-17.
3.
Kanaeva N.A. Kul'turnyi sintez Sarvepalli Radkhakrishnana // Zhivaya traditsiya. K 75-letiyu Indiiskogo filosofskogo kongressa. M., 2000. C. 13-25.
4.
Kanaeva N.A. Rol' Bimala Krishny Matilala v formirovanii sovremennoi paradigmy kross-kul'turnogo filosofskogo issledovaniya // www.intelros.ru/pdf/lstoria_filosofi/2011_7/22.pdf
5.
Kanaeva N.A. Issledovaniya buddiiskoi pramanavady (epistemologii i logiki) v Zapadnoi Evrope // Vostok (Oriens). 2015. S. 179-194.
6.
Kolesnikov A.S. Metodologiya komparativistskogo izucheniya filosofii i kul'tury Vostoka // Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. 2008. T. 9. Vyp. I. SPb.: Izd-vo RKhGA, 2008. S. 19-29.
7.
Kolesnikov A.S. Filosofskaya komparativistika: Vostok—Zapad: Uch. posobie. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta. 2004. S. 76.
8.
Lysenko V.G. F.I. Shcherbatskoi i O.O. Rozenberg o sravnitel'nom metode v buddologii // Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. 2008. T. 9. Vyp. I. SPb.: Izd-vo RKhGA, 2008. S. 30-39.
9.
Lysenko V.G. O.O. Rozenberg kak uchenik F.I. Shcherbatskogo // www.orientalstudies.ru/rus/images/pdf/b_rosenberg_conference_4_2011_22_lysenko.pdf.
10.
Rozenberg O.O. Trudy po buddizmu. M.: Nauka, 1991. S. 67.
11.
Seredkina E.V. «Vsemirnaya filosofiya budushchego» Fen Yulanya v sovremennom mul'tikul'turnom prostranstve: filosofsko-komparativistskii podkhod // Kantovskie chteniya v KRSU / 22 aprelya 2004 g. / Pod obshch. red. I.I. Ivanovoi. Bishkek, 2004. C. 323-330.
12.
Shokhin V.K. F.I. Shcherbatskoi i ego komparativistskaya filosofiya. M., 1998. 249 s.
13.
Shcherbatskoi F.I. Teoriya poznaniya i logika po ucheniyu pozdneishikh buddistov. V 2-kh ch. Ch. 1. “Uchebnik logiki” Darmakirti s tolkovaniem Dkharmottary. Ch. 2. Istochniki i predely poznaniya / Sanskritskie paralleli, redaktsiya i primechaniya A. V. Paribka. SPb.: «Asta-Press LTD», 1995.
14.
Shcherbatskoi F.I. Izbrannye trudy po buddizmu / Per. s angl. A. N. Zelinskogo i B.V. Semichova. M.: «Nauka», GRVL, 1988. S. 78.
15.
Abe Masao. Mahāyāna Buddhism and Whitehead: A View by a Lay Student of White-head's Philosophy // Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 25, No. 4 (Oct., 1975). P. 415-428.
16.
The American Academy of Asian Studies (From the CIIS Archives) // www.mysterium.com
17.
Betty, L. Stafford, The Buddhist-Humean Parallels: Postmortem // Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 21, No. 3 (Jan., 1971). Pp. 237-253.
18.
Cobb, John B., Jr. and McDaniel, Jay, Introduction: Conference on Mahayana Buddhism and Whitehead // Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 25, No. 4 (1975). Pp. 393-405
19.
Conze E. Buddhist Philosophy and Its European Parallels // Philosophy – East and West, Vol. 13, No. 1 (Apr., 1963). Pp. 9-23.
20.
Dewey John, Radhakrishnan S. & Santayana George. On philosophical synthesis // Phi-losophy – East and West. Vol. 1, No. 1 (1951). P.3-5.
21.
Eby, Loise S. Reviewed Work: Philosophy – East and West by Charles A. Moore. Review by: Louise S. Eby. The Far Eastern Quarterly. Vol. 4, No. 3 (May, 1945). Pp. 278-280.
22.
Hartshorne Charles. Whitehead's Differences from Buddhism // Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 25, No. 4 (Oct., 1975). Pp. 407-413.
23.
Hudson H. Wittgenstein and Zen Buddhism // Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 23, No. 4 (Oct., 1973). Pp. 471-481.
24.
Hutton, Kenneth (2009) Ethics in Schopenhauer and Buddhism. PhD thesis // http://theses.gla.ac.uk/912/
25.
Giles, James. The No-Self Theory: Hume, Buddhism, and Personal Identity // Philosophy – East and West, Vol. 43, No. 2 (Apr., 1993). Pp. 175-200.
26.
Grange, J. John Dewey, Confucius and Global Philosophy. New York: State University of New York Press, 2004.
27.
Gudmunsen Chris. Witgenstein and Buddhism. 1977.
28.
Inada Kenneth K. Whitehead's 'Actual Entity' and the Buddha's Anātman // Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 21, No. 3 (Jul., 1971). Pp. 303-316.
29.
Ingalls, Daniel H.H. The Comparison of Western and Indian Philosophy // The Journal of Oriental Research[Madras] XXII, 1954. Pp. 151-164.
30.
Mabbett I. W. Nāgārjuna and Zeno on Motion // Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 34, No. 4 (Oct., 1984), pp. 401-420.
31.
Masson-Oursel, P. Comparative Philosophy [1923]. London: Kegan, Paul, Trench, Trub-ner, Co. Ltd., 1926.
32.
McEvilley. ”Pyrrhonism and Mādhyamika”. Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 32, No. 1 (1982). Pp. 3-35.
33.
Mitchell Donald W. Analysis in Theravāda Buddhism// Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 21, No. 1 (Jan., 1971). Pp. 23-31.
34.
Moore Charles Alexander (ed.). Philosophy – East and West. N.-Y.: Princeton University Press, 1944.
35.
Moore Charles Alexander (ed.). Philosophy – East and West. Freeport, N.Y., Books for Libraries Press, 1970.
36.
Nortrop S.C.. The Meeting of East and West: An Inquiry Concerning World Understand-ing, New York: The Macmillan Company, 1946. Reprinted in 1979, Ox Bow Press.
37.
Nortrop S.C. & Livingston, Helen H. (ed.), Cross-Cultural Understanding: Epistemology in Anthropology. New York: Harper & Row, 1964.
38.
Olson Robert F.. Whitehead, Mādhyamika, and the Prajñāpāramitā // Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 25, No. 4 (Oct., 1975). Pp. 449-464.
39.
Shaw Miranda. William James and Yogācāra Philosophy: A Comparative Inquiry // Phi-losophy – East and West. Vol. 37, No. 3 (Jul., 1987). Pp. 223-244.
40.
Siderits Mark and O'Brien J. Dervin. Zeno and Nāgārjuna on Motion//Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 26, No. 3 (Jul., 1976). Pp. 281-299.
41.
Stsherbatsky Th. The Buddhist logic. Vol. 1-2. L., AN SSSR, 1930-1932 (Bibl. Buddh., XXI, XXVI).
42.
Umehara Takeshi. Heidegger and Buddhism // Philosophy East and West. Vol. 20, No. 3 (Jul., 1970), pp. 271-281.
43.
Stambaugh Joan. Commentary on Takeshi Umehara's "Heidegger and Buddhism" // Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 20, No. 3 (Jul., 1970). Pp. 283-286.
44.
Waldo Ives. Nāgārjuna and Analytic Philosophy, II //Philosophy – East and West. Vol. 28, No. 3 (Jul., 1978). Pp. 287-298.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website