' (Seyn) . ' - ' ' - NotaBene.ru
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought

The notion of being (Seyn) in M. Heideggers philosophy and its methodological peculiarities

Tsendrovskiy Oleg

PhD in Philosophy

senior teacher of the Department of Philosophy and Social Studies at Nizhny Novgorod State Pedagogical University

603005, Russia, Nizhegorodskaya oblast', g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Ul'yanova, 1






Review date:


Publish date:


Abstract: This article conducts a thorough analysis of the fundamental for M. Heidegger’s doctrine notion of being (das Sein/Seyn), as well as resulting from it interpretations of the methodological peculiarities of the thinker. In a paradoxical way, within the scientific tradition of the study of Heidegger’s heritage, the question about the specific content of the notion of being is revealed briefly and unsatisfactory, even despite its paramount importance. The author makes an attempt to eliminate this flaw carefully examining all of the existing conceptual layers of Heidegger’s Seyn. The work present a detailed review of the peculiar features of the philosophical thought of Heidegger, which directly originate from the understanding of its main subject – the being. The described analysis is conducted in accordance with the text written after a so-called “turn” that took place in the philosophy of Heidegger in the 1930’s. It allows avoiding the spread methodological mistake of exaggerating the importance of the “Being of time”; as well as the attempt to interpret a semicentennial development of his though through the prism of a certain book, which in the philosopher’s opinion was unsuccessful. The author’s main contribution lies in the unique for the commentator’s tradition scheme, which suggest the gradual and systemic clarification of the essence of being in the doctrine of Heidegger through the 10 of his fundamental attributes.

Keywords: Establishment, Truth, Being, Time, Being, Phenomenology, Ontology, Fundamental ontology, Heidegger, Philosophy of religion
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Heidegger M. Gesamtausgabe. Frankfurt am Mein: Vittorio Klosterman, 1975. Bd.: 7 (298 S.), 12 (262 S.), 14 (155 S.), 15 (447 S.), 65 (513 S.), 69 (229 S.), 70 (200 S.), 94 (536 S.), 96 (285 S.).
Khaidegger M. Parmenid. SPb.: Vladimir Dal', 2009. 383 c.
Inwood M. A Heidegger Dictionary. Malden: Blackwell Publishers, 1999. 283 pp.
Inwood M. Heidegger: A Very Short Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000. 154 pp.
Dahlstrom D.O. The Heidegger Dictionary. London: Bloomsbury Publishing, 2013. 312 pp.
Schalow F., Denker A. Historical Dictionary of Heideggers Philosophy. Lanham: Scarecrow Press, 2010. 429 pp.
Dugin A.G. Martin Khaidegger: filosofiya drugogo Nachala. M.: Akademicheskii proekt; Fond Mir, 2010. 389 c.
Motroshilova N.V. Raboty raznykh let: izbrannye stat'i i esse. M.: Fenomenologiya-Germenevtika, 2005. 576 c.
Khaidegger M. Nitsshe: v 2 t. SPb.: Vladimir Dal', 2006. 603 c.
Khaidegger M. Vremya i bytie: sbornik. M.: Respublika, 1993. 447 c.
Richardson W.J. Heidegger: Through Phenomenology to Thought. New York: Fordham University Press, 2003. 778 pp.
Khaidegger M. Razgovor na proselochnoi doroge: sbornik. M.: Vyssh. shk., 1991. 192 c.
Boetsii. Kakim obrazom Troitsa est' edinyi Bog, a ne tri bozhestva // Uteshenie filosofiei i drugie traktaty. M.: Nauka, 1990. 415 s.
Khaidegger M. K chemu poety? / Dugin A.G. Martin Khaidegger: filosofiya drugogo Nachala. M.: Akademicheskii proekt; Fond Mir, 2010. S. 299-352.
Khaidegger M. Polozhenie ob osnovanii. SPb.: izd-vo SPbGU; Aleteiya, 2000. (Metafizicheskie issledovaniya. Prilozhenie k al'manakhu.) 290 s.
Chernyakov A.G. Ontologiya vremeni. Bytie i vremya v filosofii Aristotelya, Gusserlya i Khaideggera. SPb.: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola, 2001. 460 s.
Khaidegger M. Geraklit. SPb.: Vladimir Dal', 2011. 513 s.
Capobianco R. Engaging Heidegger. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2010. 183 pp.
Young J. Heideggers Later Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. 132 pp.
Khaidegger M. Istok khudozhestvennogo tvoreniya: sbornik. M.: Akademicheskii proekt, 2008. 528 c.
Shagiakhmetov M.R. Sistemnaya ontologiya // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. 11. C. 1621-1630. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.11.6325. C. 1621-1630.
Prokhorov M.M. Ontologiya: bytie i nebytie ili bytie i sushchee? // Filosofskaya mysl'. 2013. 5. C. 1-102. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8728.2013.5.284. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_284.html C. 1-102.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website