Статья 'Эрос: по ту сторону сингулярности' - журнал 'Философская мысль' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Eros: on the other side of singularity

Spektor David Mikhailovich

PhD in Architecture

Docent, the department of Architecture, Moscow State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering

109451 Russia, Moscow, 3-ya Kabelnaya 1

daspektor@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8728.2016.4.18335

Review date:

14-03-2016


Publish date:

08-04-2016


Abstract: The subject of this research is presented by a repeatedly mention, but still quite mysterious connection between Eros, death, and power. It is demonstrated that the specified realities could not be cognized based on the modern meanings and interpretations. The connection between death, Eros, and power includes a number of important historical metamorphoses, the essence of which in fact reconstructs this research. One of its initial points is the proclaimed by Foucault entrenchment of power in “biopolitics”.  Such reconstruction allows stating the reverse pace of the historical logic: domination of “biopolitics”, which equally substantiates the forms of power, Eros, and survival. Method of the research is associated with the analysis of the historical reconstruction of Eros, exogamy, and (symbolic) exchange. Its logical canvas is subordinated to the reconstructing succession of the intercommunity relations that are based predominantly on the two factors: aggression and its only antipode – captivity of wives. Referring to such descriptive sketches, the article underpins the ontology. The scientific novelty consists in proving the fact that collectivity in the eyes of community is the essence of the commonness of genders – male and female. The latters are not created by the nature not being a natural expression and continuation of gender; it’s the ontological predeterminations, from the relationship of which originates the commonness of human (being).


Keywords: intercommunity relations, death, exogamy, initiation, commonness, victim, gift, Eros, biopolitics, power
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Fromm E. Zabytyi yazyk. Imet' ili byt'? M.: AST, 2009. S. 255.
2.
Fuko M. Volya k istine: po tu storonu znaniya, vlasti i seksual'nosti. Raboty raznykh let / Per. s frants. M.: Kastal', 1996. S. 115.
3.
Bodriiyar Zh. Simvolicheskii obmen i smert'. M.: Dobrosvet, 2000. S. 44, 241, 242, 245-246.
4.
Istoriya pervobytnogo obshchestva. Epokha pervobytnoi rodovoi obshchiny / Obshch. red. Yu.V. Bromlei. M.: Nauka, 1986. S. 76, 77, 79, 112, 114.
5.
Deskola F. Po tu storonu prirody i kul'tury. M.: Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie, 2012. S. 412-413.
6.
Levinas E. Put' k drugomu. SPb.: Izd. S.-Peterburgskogo universiteta, 2006. S. 180.
7.
Voina i mir v rannei istorii chelovechestva. M.: Institut etnologii i antropologii RAN, 1994. T. 1-2. S. 13-14.
8.
Lorents K. Oborotnaya storona zerkala. M.: Respublika, 1998. S. 224.
9.
Borodai Yu.M. Erotika — smert' — tabu: tragediya chelovecheskogo soznaniya. M.: Gnozis, Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo, 1996. S. 178, 225.
10.
Rouz F. Aborigeny Avstralii. Traditsionnoe obshchestvo. M.: Progress, 1989. S. 71.
11.
Anikovich M.V. Povsednevnaya zhizn' okhotnikov na mamontov. M.: Molodaya rvardiya, 2004. S. 288.
12.
Golovnev A.V. Antropologiya dvizheniya (drevnosti Severnoi Evrazii). Ekaterinburg: UrO RAN; Volot, 2009. S. 46-47.
13.
Spektor D.M. Evolyutsiya: popytka pozitivno-ontologicheskoi interpretatsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. № 3. S. 384-481.
14.
Zolotarev A.M. Rodovoi stroi i pervobytnaya mifologiya. M.: Nauka, 1964. S. 54, 73.
15.
Semenov Yu.I. Proiskhozhdenie braka i sem'i. M.: Mysl', 1974. S. 149.
16.
Levi-Stros K. Totemizm segodnya. Nepriruchennaya mysl'. M.: Akademicheskii Proekt, 2008. S. 60-61.
17.
Levinas E. Vremya i drugoi. SPb.: Vysshaya religiozno-filosofskaya shkola, 1998. S. 103.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website