по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Philosophical Thought
Reference:

Habermas' Discursive Concept of Freedom
Parkhomenko Roman Nikolaevich

Doctor of Philosophy

Docent, the department of Philosophy and Culturology, Russian University of Transport

127994, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Obraztsova, d. 9, str. 9

parkhomenkor@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0174.2013.4.170

Review date:

26-02-2020


Publish date:

1-4-2013


Abstract.

The article is devoted to the prerequisites of Jurgen Habermas' theory of society as well as his idea of deliberative democracy that is based on the discursive agreement of all members of the society on vital social issues. Opposed to the classical interpretation of democracy, Habermas' consensus principle states that laws and regulations are legitimate not because they are mandatory for all individuals but because these laws and regulations are willingly accepted by all members of the society. In the classical theory of demoracy laws and regulations must be willingly accepted by individuals because they are just and fair, while Habermas' principle of justice is based on the democratic principle that these laws and regulations are accepted by all individuals concerned. Therefore, grounds for accepting a law or regulation are created not by practical reason or theoretical research but by open discussion of all members of the society. As an addition to the article, you shall also find Jurgen Habermas' brief biography and an extensive list of references. 

Keywords: freedom, deliberative democracy, Habermas, theory of society, action of communication, rationality, Frankfurt School, theory of action, lifeworld, system
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Dabosin P. «Kriticheskaya» teoriya obshchestva i gosudarstva Yu. Khabermasa: metodologicheskii aspekt. Izhevsk, 2001. 171 s.
2.
Denezhkin, A. «Faktichnost' i znachimost' Yu. Khabermasa: novye issledovaniya po teorii prava i demokraticheskogo pravovogo gosudarstva // Khabermas Demokratiya, razum, nravstvennost'. Lektsii i interv'yu. Moskva, aprel' 1989 g. M. 1995.
3.
Markov B. V poiskakh drugogo. C. 6-7 // Khabermas Yu. Vovlechenie drugogo. SPb., 2008.
4.
Motroshilova N. Khabermas C. 286-287 // Stepin, V./Guseinov, A./Semigin, G./Ogurtsov, A. Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya v 4-kh tt. M. 2010. T. 4.
5.
Petrenko E. Yu. Khabermas razmyshlyaet o moderne //Khabermas Yu. Filosofskii diskurs o moderne. Dvenadtsat' lektsii. M. 2008.
6.
Khabermas, Yu. 1995: Demokratiya, razum, nravstvennost'. Lektsii i interv'yu. Moskva, aprel' 1989 g. M. 254 s.
7.
Khabermas, Yu. 2005: Politicheskie raboty. M. 368 s.
8.
Khabermas, Yu. 2006: Moral'noe soznanie i kommunikativnoe deistvie. SPb. 380 s.
9.
Khabermas, Yu. 2008: Vovlechenie drugogo. Ocherki politicheskoi teorii. SPb. 417 s.
10.
Khabermas, Yu. 2008: Raskolotyi zapad. M. 192 c.
11.
Khabermas, Yu. 2008: Filosofskii diskurs o moderne. Dvenadtsat' lektsii. M. 416 s.
12.
Shachin, S.V. Kommunikativnaya teoriya razuma Yurgena Khabermasa. Murmansk. 2010. 243 s.
13.
Farman, I. Sotsial'no-kul'turnye proekty Yurgena Khabermasa. M. 1999. 244 s.
14.
Gosepath S. Gleichheit in Habermas’ und Dworkins Theorien der Gerechtigkeit. S. 96. // Pauer-Studer, H / Nagl-Docekal, H. (Hgg.) Freiheit, Gleichheit und Autonomie. Wien/Berlin. 2003. 395 S.
15.
Pauer-Studer H. Autonom leben. Reflexionen über Freiheit und Gleichheit. Frankfurt a. M. 2000. 293 S.
16.
Habermas J. 1981: Theorie des kommunikativen Bd. 1: Handlungsrationalität und gesellschaftliche Rationalisierung; Bd. 2: Zur Kritik der funktionalistischen Vernunft), Frankfurt a.M.
17.
Habermas J. 1984: Vorstudien und Ergänzungen zur Theorie des kommunikativen Handels. Frankfurt a.M.
18.
Habermas J. 1985: Der philosophische Diskurs der Moderne. Frankfurt a.M.
19.
Habermas J. 1992: Faktizität und Geltung. Beiträge zur Diskurstheorie des Rechts und des demokratischen Rechtsstaates, Frankfurt a.M. 667 S.
20.
Habermas J. 2009: Philosophische Texte, 5 Bände, Studienausgabe, Suhrkamp, Frankfurt a.M.Bd. 4. Politische Theorie. 436 S.
21.
Parkhomenko R.N.. Yu. Khabermas o sovremennoi demokratii // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. – 2013. – № 12. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2013.12.9516.
22.
R.N. Parkhomenko. Yu. Khabermas o ponyatii idei svobody // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – № 5. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.05.13.
23.
A. V. Aleksenko. Kontseptsiya legitimatsii politiko-pravovykh reshenii Niklasa Lumana // Pravo i politika. – 2012. – № 3. – S. 104-107.
24.
R.N. Parkhomenko. Teoriya deliberativnoi demokratii Yu. Khabermasa // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – № 4. – S. 104-107.
25.
Zaitsev A.V.. Deliberativnaya demokratiya v kontekste dialoga gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo. – 2013. – № 10. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2013.10.7708.
26.
Zaitsev A.V. INSTITUTsIONAL''NYI DIALOG V SFERE KOMMUNIKATsII GOSUDARSTVA I GRAZhDANSKOGO OBShchESTVA: TEORETIKO-METODOLOGIChESKII PODKhOD // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2012.-1.-C. 21-54. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2012.1.110. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_110.html
27.
Zaitsev A.V. DIALOG GOSUDARSTVA I GRAZhDANSKOGO OBShchESTVA KAK PEREGOVORNYI PROTsESS: LINGVO-POLITOLOGIChESKII ASPEKT. // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2012.-3.-C. 34-47. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2012.3.120. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_120.html 36.
28.
A.V. Zaitsev Grazhdanskii dialog v ES i dialog gosudarstva i grazhdanskogo obshchestva v sovremennoi Rossii: opyt sravnitel'nogo analiza // Politika i Obshchestvo.-2012.-10.-C. 28-36. 28. Zaitsev A.V. PRINTsIP OBRATNOI SVYaZI I INSTITUTsIONALIZATsIYa DIALOGA GOSUDARSTVA I GRAZhDANSKOGO OBShchESTVA // NB: Problemy obshchestva i politiki.-2012.-2.-C. 1-21. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0158.2012.2.125. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_125.html
29.
Zaitsev A.V. DIALOGIKA YuRGENA KhABERMASA: PONYaTIE I SUShchNOST'' // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya.-2012.-2.-C. 75-98. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2012.2.148. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_148.html
30.
Zaitsev A.V. Grazhdanskii dialog v ES i Evraziiskii integratsionnyi proekt : sravnitel'no-diskursivnyi analiz // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2012.-1.-C. 130-148. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2012.1.130. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_130.html
31.
Zaitsev A.V. LINGVOPOLITOLOGIYa VS POLITIChESKAYa LINGVISTIKA: VOZMOZhEN LI DIALOG? // NB: Filologicheskie issledovaniya.-2012.-1.-C. 25-81. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fil/article_150.htm
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website