Статья 'Три взгляда на пушкинскую трагедию' - журнал 'Litera' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Litera
Reference:

Three Focuses on Pushkin's Tragedy

Gurevich Pavel Semenovich

head of the division at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, str. 1, of. -

gurevich@rambler.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-8698.2015.1.15775

Review date:

06-07-2015


Publish date:

16-07-2015


Abstract: Article is devoted to A.S. Pushkin's tragedy "Mozart and Salieri" in interpretations of famous Russian philosophers – S. Bulgakov, G. Meyer, I. Ilyin. It is remarkable that the Russian thinkers quite often addressed to art. Their philosophical experiences in area of literature are very significant. In this case three views of Pushkin's tragedy are compared: each of philosophers offers the option of the main conflict which is the cornerstone of this composition. So, S. Bulgakov considers that the main contents of the tragedy are interfaced to friendship dramatic art. Estimating this condition as spiritual, connected with love, he considers that tragic sense of work in treachery of friendship from Salieri. Other reading of the tragedy is offered by G. Meyer. It regards as of paramount importance a figure of the black person who ordered to the composer the requiem. Here, according to the philosopher, the main conflict of the tragedy. It is that Salieri acts in full consent with the death angel. The murder subject, thus, finds additional connotations. At last, I. Ilyin sees tragedy grain in the conflict of genius and villainy. Round this subject is also under construction its analysis of work of Pushkin. In article concepts of an esthetics which allow to consider features of the tragedy as a genre are used. At the same time the author uses also the komparativistsky method helping to reveal the general and excellent in interpretations of the tragedy the Russian philosophers. In article three views of A.S. Pushkin's tragedy "Mozart and Salieri" are for the first time compared. Each of these approaches to contents of the composition allows to comprehend the main conflict of the tragedy in a new way. In article critical evaluation of the version, according to which tragedy essence in treachery of friendship is given. At such treatment it wasn't obligatory for Pushkin to take a plot from musical practice. Besides, this look lays aside other vital problems put by the tragedy – whether is art craft, whether are compatible the genius and villainy, etc. Certainly, the analyzed articles didn't apply for the complete and full analysis of the tragedy. However taken together, they give the developed idea of interpretation of the tragedy of Pushkin "Mozart and Salieri" in the Russian philosophy.


Keywords: literature, tragedy, art, genious, friendship, villainy, harmony, death, craft, trade, music
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Pushkin v russkoi filosofskoi kritike. Konets XIX-XX vek / Sost. toma, podgot. teksta, vstup. st. i primech. R.A. Gal'tsevoi. 3-e izd. M.; SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2014. 591 s.
2.
Bulgakov S. Motsart i Sal'eri // Pushkin v russkoi filosofskoi kritike. Konets XIX-XX vek / Sost. toma, podgot. teksta, vstup. st. i primech. R.A. Gal'tsevoi. 3-e izd. M.; SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2014. S. 263-268.
3.
Diogen Laertskii. O zhizni, ucheniyakh i izrecheniyakh znamenitykh filosofov / Obshch. red. i vstup. st. A.F. Loseva. Per. M.L. Gasparova. M.: Mysl', 1979. 620 s.
4.
Kant I. Sobr. soch. v 8 t. T. 6. M.: Choro, 1994.
5.
Rudnev V.P. Psikhologiya mikrostseny // Psikhologiya i psikhotekhnika. 2015. № 5(80). S. 470-477.
6.
Meier G. Chernyi chelovek. Ideino-khudozhestvennyi zamysel «Motsarta i Sal'eri» // Pushkin v russkoi filosofskoi kritike. Konets XIX-XX vek / Sost. toma, podgot. teksta, vstup. st. i primech. R.A. Gal'tsevoi. 3-e izd. M.; SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2014. S. 370-377.
7.
Il'in I. «Motsart i Sal'eri» Pushkina (genii i zlodeistvo) // Pushkin v russkoi filosofskoi kritike. Konets XIX-XX vek / Sost. toma, podgot. teksta, vstup. st. i primech. R.A. Gal'tsevoi. 3-e izd. M.; SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2014. S. 355-365.
8.
Aristotel'. Ob iskusstve poezii / Grech. tekst s per. i ob''yasneniyami V.G. Appel'rota. Izd. 2-e, repr. M.: URSS, 2012. 97 s.
9.
Borodai Yu.M. Erotika. Smert'. Tabu: tragediya chelovecheskogo soznaniya. M.: Gnozis; Russkoe fenomenologicheskoe obshchestvo, 1996. 416 s.
10.
Gadamer G.G. Istina i metod: Osnovy filos. germenevtiki / Obshch. red. i vstup. st. B.N. Bessonova. M.: Progress, 1988. 699 s.
11.
Kartseva G.A. Ritm kak filosofsko-antropologicheskii fenomen. M.: IF RAN, 2003.
12.
Spirova E.M. Filosofsko-antropologicheskoe soderzhanie simvola. M.: «Kanon +» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2012. 336 s.
13.
Ustyugova E.N. Stil' kak yavlenie kul'tury. SPb.: SPbGU, 1994. 94 s.
14.
Shelling F.V. Filosofiya iskusstva / Per. P.S. Popova. Pod obshch. red. M.F. Ovsyannikova. SPb.: Aleteiya, 1996. 495 s.
15.
Sherkova T.M. «Vykhozhdenie v den'» // Arkhetip. Filosofsko-psikhoanaliticheskii zhurnal. 1996. № 1
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website