|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Man and Culture
Reference:
Serov N.V.
Colour Images Arrangement Logic
// Man and Culture.
2012. № 2.
P. 106-176.
DOI: 10.7256/2306-1618.2012.2.251 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=251
Colour Images Arrangement Logic
Serov Nikolai Viktorovich
Doctor of Cultural Studies
Professor of the Department of Philosophy and Cultural Research at St. Petersburg State Institute of Psychology and Social Work
|
n.serov@gmail.com
|
|
 |
|
Received:
17-11-2012
Published:
1-12-2012
Abstract:
The purpose of the article is to show the difference between the two thinking strategies in art and culture. Chromatic methodology was used to perform the semantic marking of color and picture based on well known patterns of bilateral cogitation. The research allowed semiotic characteristics that described peculiarities of everyday, logical and creative thinking. The results of the research can be used in the theory of culture, creativity, fashion and art history practice.
Keywords:
cogitation semiotics, color semiotics, creativity, theory of fashion, color, paint, shape, image, term
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
Данная статья снята с публикации.
References
1. Anan'ev B. G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya. L.: LGU, 1969. 340 s.
2. Arnkheim R. Iskusstvo i vizual'noe vospriyatie. M.: Progress, 1974. 392 s.
3. Volkov N.N. Tsvet v zhivopisi. M.: Iskusstvo, 1985. 320 s.
4. Galeev B.M. Iskusstvo kosmicheskogo veka. Kazan': FEN, 2002. 572 s.
5. Losev A.F. Kriticheskie zamechaniya k dialogu. // Platon. Soch.v 3 tomakh, t.2. M.: Mysl', 1970, s.488-497.
6. Mertsalova M.N. Kostyum raznykh vremen i narodov. Entsiklopediya v 4-kh tomakh. T.3-4. (Komment. k il.: Aleksandr Vasil'ev). M.: Akademiya Mody, SPb.: Chart Pilot, 2001. – 576 s.
7. Polak F. Obraz budushchego. / Mir nashego zavtra: Antologiya sovremennoi klassicheskoi prognostiki. M.: Eksmo, 2003. 512 s.
8. Shelling F. Filosofiya iskusstva. M.: Mysl', 1966. 496 s.
9. Bardi A., Schwartz Sh. H. Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations. // Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 2003, Vol. 29, No. 10, p.1207-1220
10. Berlin B., Kay P. Basic color terms: their universality and evolution. Berkeley: UCP, 1969. 110 p.
11. Blanc C. Grammaire des arts du dessin. P., 1867, p.22. Cit. a: [Gage J. Color and meaning, p.35].
12. Catalogue d'exposition: Rubens contre Poussin. La querelle du coloris dans la peinture française à la fin du XVIIe siècle. Gent: Éditions Ludion, 2004. 196 r.
13. Gage J. Colour and meaning. Art, Science and Symbolism. L.: Thames & Hudson, 2000. 320 p.
14. Gage J. Colour and culture. Practice and meaning from Antiquity to Abstraction. L.: Thames & Hudson, 2005. 338 p
15. Ginsburgh V., Weyers S. De Piles, Drawing and Color An Essay in Quantitative Art History. // Artibus et Historiae, 2002, V. 45, p.101-114.
16. Jung C.G. The Red Book. Liber Novus. (Ed. Shamdasani S.) N.Y., L.: W.W.Norton & Co., 2009. 404 p
17. Matisse H. Ecrits et propos sur l’art. P.: Hermann, 1972. 364 p.
18. O'Connor K.P., Blowers G.H. Cognitive style, set and sorting strategy.// British J. Psychology, 1980, V.71, p.17-22.
19. Oken L., Physiophilosophy, 1810, Engl.trans.1847, 78, §378. Cit. a: [Gage J. Color and meaning. p. 297].
20. Steffens H. Was Ich Erlebte. 1841. Cit. a: [Gage J. Color and meaning. p. 175].
21. Teyssèdre B. Roger de Piles et les débats sur le coloris au siècle de Louis XIV. Paris: La Bibliothèque des Arts, 1957. 630 p.
22. Wittgenstein L. Remarks on colour. / Ed. G. E. M. Anscombe. Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1977. 128 r
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
