DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.10.27293

Abstract: This article examines the scientific approaches towards understanding constitutionalism in the global, integration, and national dimension; as well as the role of constitutional teleology in creating conceptual and regulatory framework of the national and global constitutionalism in the context of formation of integration law. The study determines the forms of interaction between the Russian constitutionalism and integration law, and their reflection in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The author rationalizes the modern approaches towards understanding and terminological definition of constitution as the ultimate and supreme law of the country, regulating the domestic and international integration relations. The scientific views upon the key elements of constitutional law from the perspective of internationalization processes are revealed. The scientific novelty of this work consists in description of the theoretical framework of correlation between the global and national constitutionalism, Russian specificity of legal nature of constitutionalism, analysis of theological foundations of the formation of constitutional communication and constitutional identity, formulation of the concept of constitutional law from the perspective of Russia’s involvement in the integration and international relations. The article reflects the problem of internationalization of constitutional law and the problem of open structure of the constitution. The author suggests new forms for Russia’s participation in formation of the doctrine and practice of global constitutionalism, considering the challenges of integration processes in creation of the regulatory and structural framework of the Russian constitutionalism as an open system.

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2019.10.43183

Abstract: This article examines the scientific approaches towards understanding constitutionalism in the global, integration, and national dimension; as well as the role of constitutional teleology in creating conceptual and regulatory framework of the national and global constitutionalism in the context of formation of integration law. The study determines the forms of interaction between the Russian constitutionalism and integration law, and their reflection in the Constitution of the Russian Federation. The author rationalizes the modern approaches towards understanding and terminological definition of constitution as the ultimate and supreme law of the country, regulating the domestic and international integration relations. The scientific views upon the key elements of constitutional law from the perspective of internationalization processes are revealed. The scientific novelty of this work consists in description of the theoretical framework of correlation between the global and national constitutionalism, Russian specificity of legal nature of constitutionalism, analysis of theological foundations of the formation of constitutional communication and constitutional identity, formulation of the concept of constitutional law from the perspective of Russia’s involvement in the integration and international relations. The article reflects the problem of internationalization of constitutional law and the problem of open structure of the constitution. The author suggests new forms for Russia’s participation in formation of the doctrine and practice of global constitutionalism, considering the challenges of integration processes in creation of the regulatory and structural framework of the Russian constitutionalism as an open system.

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2018.4.25339

Abstract: This article examines the role of the constitutional design in creating the normative legal and theoretical grounds of the Russian monarchic bicameralism; scientific approaches of the national liberal political scientists and constitutionalists towards understanding of bicameralism as a two-chamber parliamentary structure in the early XX century; correlation between parliamentarism and other types f constitutional monarchy within the practice o parliamentary institutions; conservative persuasions and views of the state reformers upon the capabilities and boundaries of the monarchic bicameralism in the Russian Empire; legal and political factors of the functionality of State Duma and State Council in terms of the conservative monarchic constitutionalism of the 1906-1917. The author applies the method of constitutional design for the more profound understanding of the conflict between the constitutional liberal and conservative protective models of Russian reforms in the early XX century. The scientific novelty consists in determination of the Russian specificity of legal and political nature of the monarchic bicameralism, using the method of constitutional design, comparative legal and specific-historical analysis, as well as the problem of implementation of the principles of discontinuity and continuity, and other principles of interaction between the State Duma and State Council. The author outlines the constitutional design and functionality of the Russian bicameralism in the beginning of XX century, which demonstrate the bicameral structure of the representative government in Russia mostly among the lawyers-constitutionalists and constitutional democrats. The conservative bureaucratic circles of the reformers did not share the values of progressive bicameralism and parliamentarism, compounded into a single constitutional project of parliamentary bicameralism.

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2018.4.43132

Abstract: This article examines the role of the constitutional design in creating the normative legal and theoretical grounds of the Russian monarchic bicameralism; scientific approaches of the national liberal political scientists and constitutionalists towards understanding of bicameralism as a two-chamber parliamentary structure in the early XX century; correlation between parliamentarism and other types f constitutional monarchy within the practice o parliamentary institutions; conservative persuasions and views of the state reformers upon the capabilities and boundaries of the monarchic bicameralism in the Russian Empire; legal and political factors of the functionality of State Duma and State Council in terms of the conservative monarchic constitutionalism of the 1906-1917. The author applies the method of constitutional design for the more profound understanding of the conflict between the constitutional liberal and conservative protective models of Russian reforms in the early XX century. The scientific novelty consists in determination of the Russian specificity of legal and political nature of the monarchic bicameralism, using the method of constitutional design, comparative legal and specific-historical analysis, as well as the problem of implementation of the principles of discontinuity and continuity, and other principles of interaction between the State Duma and State Council. The author outlines the constitutional design and functionality of the Russian bicameralism in the beginning of XX century, which demonstrate the bicameral structure of the representative government in Russia mostly among the lawyers-constitutionalists and constitutional democrats. The conservative bureaucratic circles of the reformers did not share the values of progressive bicameralism and parliamentarism, compounded into a single constitutional project of parliamentary bicameralism.

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.1.16285

Abstract:   The author explores the problem of identification of the Russian republicanism and constitutionalism, demonstrates the relationship between the constitutional form of government and models of separation of powers, open scientific approaches to understanding the nature and features of the republican form of government established by the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 1993. Particular attention is paid to the dynamic possibilities, realities and prospects of the development of the republican form of government in Russia. The study analyzes the theoretical basis, the origins of the principle of separation of powers, constitutional contours of the model of separation of powers ("flexible", "hard" and "mixed" models), as well as the problem of the origin, development and implementation of the modern principle of separation of powers as the basis of the constitutional order of Russia. The scientific novelty consists in the formulation of specific features of various models of separation of powers in light of their effect, implementation, as well as the future development of the republican form of government within the Russian model, including the identification of legal nature of the Russian constitutionalism.  

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2016.1.42824

Abstract:   The author explores the problem of identification of the Russian republicanism and constitutionalism, demonstrates the relationship between the constitutional form of government and models of separation of powers, open scientific approaches to understanding the nature and features of the republican form of government established by the Constitution of the Russian Federation in 1993. Particular attention is paid to the dynamic possibilities, realities and prospects of the development of the republican form of government in Russia. The study analyzes the theoretical basis, the origins of the principle of separation of powers, constitutional contours of the model of separation of powers ("flexible", "hard" and "mixed" models), as well as the problem of the origin, development and implementation of the modern principle of separation of powers as the basis of the constitutional order of Russia. The scientific novelty consists in the formulation of specific features of various models of separation of powers in light of their effect, implementation, as well as the future development of the republican form of government within the Russian model, including the identification of legal nature of the Russian constitutionalism.  

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2014.9.12859

Abstract:

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2014.9.13057

Abstract:

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2014.9.42509

Abstract:

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2013.13.10424

Abstract:

DOI: 10.7256/2454-0706.2013.13.42385

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract:

Abstract: