Статья 'Подход ландшафтного урбанизма при реконструкции городских набережных в условиях крупного города' - журнал 'Урбанистика' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Urban Studies
Reference:

An approach of landscape urbanism in reconstruction of waterfront areas in a large city

Bulatova Evgeniya Konstantinovna

PhD in Architecture

Docent, the department of Architecture, Ural Federal University named after the first President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin

620076, Russia, Sverdlovskaya oblast', g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Mira, 17

bulatova_ek@bk.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2310-8673.2020.3.32388

Review date:

13-03-2020


Publish date:

06-07-2020


Abstract: This article explores a relevant problem of implementation of innovative approaches in the sphere of landscape engineering applicable to reconstruction of city waterfront areas, namely in the large cities. The author reviews the example of realization of the project modern waterfront areas, which considered the indicated factors and engineering principles. On the example of Magnitogorsk, the author examines the modern functional and planning pattern, as well as the quality of shelf territories with determination of the prospects of their transformation, taking into account the principles of landscape urbanism and formation of the single ecological-recreational framework. The method of sampling allowed defining the promising vectors in improvement of aesthetic qualities of a city waterfront area and its safety for all population groups that actively use urban recreational environment. The article underlines the advantages and disadvantages of the conducted reconstruction of a section of the Ural River embankment, and prospects of its further reconstruction considering the concepts of landscape urbanism and eco-city. The following conclusion were made: 1) landscape approach ensured the essential geographic connectedness of the territory, protect city systems from natural disasters (storms, floods, etc.); 2) restoration and reconstruction of shelf area of the Ural River would allow to not only form a unified recreational space and water recreational framework for the purpose of sustainable development of the territory, but also protect the territory from waterlogging; 3) landscape urbanism would contribute to wellness and ecological comfort of the population.


Keywords: recreational environment, natural disasters, ecological recreation, urban planning technologies, embankments, reconstruction, landscape urbanism, urban innovation, urban environment, water recreational framework
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Krasil'nikova E. Landshaftnyi urbanizm: novyi vzglyad na staruyu problemu [Elektronnyi resurs]. – URL: http://green-city.su/landshaftnyj-urbanizm (data obrashcheniya: 19.01.2019).
2.
Koroleva I.S., Korolev A.S. Protsess urbanizatsii beregovykh prostranstv sovremennogo goroda (na primere Belgorodskoi gorodskoi aglomeratsii) // Uspekhi sovremennogo estestvoznaniya. – 2018. – № 4. – S. 127-132; URL: http://www.natural-sciences.ru/ru/article/view?id=36736 (data obrashcheniya: 12.02.2020).
3.
Corner, J. Terra Fluxus / C.Waldheim // The landscape Urbanism. – New York, 2006. – R. 21-34.
4.
Tschumi B. Notations: Diagrams and Sequences / B. Tschumi.-London: Artifice Books on Architecture, 2014.-304 s.
5.
Koolhaas Rem/ OMA. Madrid: El Croquis 76, 1996.-256c.
6.
Krasil'nikova E.E. Sovremennyi landshaftno-gra-dostroitel'nyi podkhod k sozdaniyu gorodskikh obshchestven-no-rekreatsionnykh territorii. – Proekt Nizhnyaya Volga. – 2013. – No 4. – S. 26.
7.
Yarmosh T.S., Mikhailova I.D. Landshaftnyi urbanizm-novoe napravlenie sovremennykh kontseptsii razvitiya gorodskogo prostranstva na primere gorodov Rossii // Vestnik BGTU im. V.G. Shukhova. 2019. № 7. S. 72-80. DOI: 10.34031/artitie_5d35d0b7b4d548.97521615
8.
Allen S. Mat Urbanism: The thick 2D. Munich. Prestel / Harvard School, 2001. S. 118–126.
9.
Paramonova D. Griby, mutanty i drugie: arkhitektura ery Luzhkova / Institut media, arkhitektury i dizaina «Strelka», – M., 2013. – 112 s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website