Статья 'Исполнение трансграничных деликтных обязательств: монетарный аспект' - журнал 'Международное право' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
International Law
Reference:

Discharge of tortious liabilities: monetary aspect

Voronkov Nikita Sergeevich

Post-graduate student, the department of Public and Private International Law, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”; Consultant at Deloitte

101000, Russia, Moscow, Myasnitskaya Street 20

nsvoronkov@gmail.com

DOI:

10.25136/2306-9899.2017.3.23871

Review date:

13-08-2017


Publish date:

16-09-2017


Abstract.

This article analyzes the peculiarities of discharge of tortious liabilities, complicated by foreign element, from the perspective of applicable under such obligations currency. The author examines the existing within the legislation of various countries approaches towards the correlation between the applicable law and obligation currency. At the present stage, it seems possible to acknowledge the absence of unity of opinions within the legal science and legislation pertaining to such problematic. At the same time, the full protection of rights of the parties affected by the transboundary tortious relations is impossible without resolving the indicated issues. Within the framework of the conducted research, the author formulates the following key conclusions: firstly, notes the dissimilarities in the nature of applicable law and currency, as well as necessity of separate determination of the currency of discharging the tortious liabilities; secondly, points at purposefulness of introducing the legislative norm that contains the disputable presumption about the application of currency of the country of main residence of a compliant, considering the restorative justice orientation of the tortious liabilities. Simultaneously, the author suggests providing opportunity to the affected party to dispute presumption, proving the violation of rights and legitimate interests of a compliant by such choice of currency.

Keywords: private international law, conflict-of-law rule, discharge of obligation, used currency , obligation in foreign currency, monetary obligation, tortious obligation, tort, EU law, United States law
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Grazhdanskii kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii: chast' tret'ya ot 26 noyabrya 2001 g. № 146-FZ (v red. ot 28 marta 2017 g.). SZ RF. 2001. № 49. St. 4552. 2017. № 14. St. 1998. Stat'ya 1219.
2.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2017. № 1.
3.
Bulletin de Cour de cassation, Chambre civile 1 du decembre 1990, 88-11.949. URL: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichJuriJudi.do?idTexte=JURITEXT000007025606 (data obrashcheniya: 30.07.2017 g.).
4.
Regulation (EC) № 864/2007 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 July 2007 on the law applicable to non-contractual obligations (Rome II). URL: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2007:199:0040:0049:EN:PDF (data obrashcheniya: 20.07.2017 g.).
5.
UNIDROIT Principles of International Commercial Contracts 2016. URL: http://www.unidroit.org/english/principles/contracts/principles2016/principles2016-e.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 29.07.2017 g.).
6.
Uniform Foreign-Money Claims Act of 1989. URL: http://www.uniformlaws.org/shared/do
cs/foreign%20money%20claims/ufmca_final_89.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 30.07.2017 g.). Section 6.
7.
Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: Uchebnik. M.: Izdatel'skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2015. 655 s.
8.
Karkhalev D.N. Dinamika obyazatel'stva vsledstvie prichineniya vreda // Yurist. 2011. № 6. S. 14-16.
9.
Ushakova N.S. Ponyatie i vidy deliktnykh obyazatel'stv v grazhdanskom prave. Shuya, 2012. 11 s.
10.
Black V. Foreign Currency Claims in the Conflict of Laws. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2010. 262 p.
11.
Kleiner C. Money in private international law // Yearbook of Private International Law. 2009. Vol. 11. P. 585.
12.
Stone P. The Rome II Proposal on the Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations // The European Legal Forum. 2004. № 4. P. 213-272.
13.
Visscher L.T. The Principles of European Tort Law: The Right Path to Harmonisation? // European Review of Private Law. 2006. № 4. P. 511-543.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website