Правовые аспекты трансграничных сделок с внебиржевыми производными финансовыми инструментами (деривативами)

Плешакова Надежда Сергеевна

doi:10.25136/2306-9899.2017.3.23477


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

International Law

Reference:

Pleshakova N.S. — Legal aspects of cross-border trades with the off-exchange underlying financial instruments (derivatives) // International Law. – 2017. – № 3. – P. 31 - 44. DOI: 10.25136/2306-9899.2017.3.23477 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=23477

Legal aspects of cross-border trades with the off-exchange underlying financial instruments (derivatives)

Pleshakova Nadezhda Sergeevna

Post-graduate student, the department of Law, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”

109028, Russia, Moscow, Pereulok B. Trekhsvyatitelsky 3

nspleshakova@rambler.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2306-9899.2017.3.23477

Review date:

01-07-2017

Publish date:

09-07-2017

Abstract.

This article is dedicated to examination of the problems of choice of the applied law and jurisdiction in cross-border trades with the underlying financial instruments (derivatives), as well as issues of the parallel court and arbitration proceedings. The author analyzes the possible cases of emergence of the conflict of laws and jurisdictions that regulate the cross-border trades with derivatives, as well as indicated the ways for their resolution. The work also reviews the questions that occur from the demands raised by the regulators of various countries towards the order of conducting transaction with underlying financial instruments (derivatives) on the off-exchange market. The author analyzes the process of execution of contractual agreements between the actors of off-exchange trades with derivatives. Relevance of this topic is substantiated by the growing volume of trades with the underlying financial instruments in the international financial markets, as well as lack of due attention to the question of legal regulation of the derivative market; it is illustrated by the events of world economic crisis of 2008, as well as the emerged consequences for economy of the states and their legal systems that guarantee the rights and legitimate interests of the investors.
Keywords: transaction terms, standard documentation, parallel litigations, jurisdiction, choice of law, conflict of laws, cross-border contracts, off-exchange market, derivatives, close-out netting
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Bank for International Settlements OTC derivatives statistics at end-June 2016. Electronic resource: https://www.bis.org/publ/otc_hy1611.htm (accessed 29.06.2017).
2.	SZ RF. 1996. № 17. St. 1918; 2017. № 25. St. 3592.
3.	Vestnik Banka Rossii. 2015. № 28.
4.	SZ RF. 2001. № 49. St. 4552; 2017. № 14. St. 1998.
5.	Asoskov A.V. Osnovy kollizionnogo prava. M.: Infotropik Media, 2012. S. 292.
6.	Sm.: Hudson A. The law of finance. Sweet & Maxwell, 2012. P. 128.
7.	ISDA 2002 MASTER AGREEMENT from 22.03.2011 between the Bank of America, N.A. & LKQ Corporation. US Securities and Exchange Commission. Electronic resource: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/ data/1065696/000119312511118050/dex101.htm (accessed 29.06.2017); ISDA 2002 MASTER AGREEMENT from 11.01.2008 between HSBC Bank PLC & Interhealth Canada Infrastructure (TCI) Limited. Electronic resource: http://www.tcinewsnow.com/documents/hc/3_4.pdf (accessed 29.06.2017). Sm.: Khabarov S.A. General'nye (ramochnye) soglasheniya na rynke proizvodnykh finansovykh instrumentov // Yurist. 2015. № 6.
8.	The International Swaps and Derivatives Association. Electronic resource: http://www2.isda.org (accessed 29.06.2017).
9.	ISDA 2002 MASTER AGREEMENT from 11.01.2008 between HSBC Bank PLC & Interhealth Canada Infrastructure (TCI) Limited. Part 4(h). Schedule, P. 5. Electronic resource: http://www.tcinewsnow.com/ documents/hc/3_4.pdf (accessed 29.06.2017).
10.	ISDA 2002 MASTER AGREEMENT from 22.03.2011 between the Bank of America, N.A. & LKQ Corporation. US Securities and Exchange Commission. Part 4(h). Schedule, P. 34. Electronic resource: https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/ data/1065696/000119312511118050/ dex101.htm (accessed 29.06.2017).
11.	Standartnaya dokumentatsiya dlya srochnykh sdelok na finansovykh rynkakh (redaktsiya 2011 goda). Utverzhdena Prikazom FSFR Rossii № 11-3600/pz-i ot 28 dekabrya 2011 g. Sovet po proizvodnym finansovym instrumentam (SPFI). Elektronnyi resurs: http://94.230.15.74/files/Standart_docs.pdf (data obrashcheniya 29.06.2017).
12.	Joanna Gray, (1999) «Bankers Trust Company and Bankers Trust International plc v PT Jakarta International Hotels & Development» // Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance. 1999. Vol. 7. Issue 3, p. 271-273, https://doi.org/10.1108/eb025015. Electronic resource: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/pdfplus/ 10.1108/eb025015 (accessed 30.04.2017).
13.	Bankers Trust Company v PT Jakarta International Hotels & Development: COMC 12 MAR 1999. [1999] 1 All ER (Comm) 785. SWARB LAW. 23.08.2016. Electronic resource: http://swarb.co.uk/bankers-trust-company-v-p-t-jakarta-international-hotels-and-development-comc-12-mar-1999/ (accessed 29.06.2017).
14.	Queen's Bench Division of the High Court (Commercial Court). Electronic resource: https://www.gov.uk/courts-tribunals/queens-bench-division-of-the-high-court (accessed 29.06.2017).
15.	Guidance. Queen's Bench guide. – 174 p. Electronic resource: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/queens-bench-guide (accessed 29.06.2017).
16.	Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories («O rynke vnebirzhevykh derivativov, tsentral'nykh kontragentakh i torgovykh repozitariyakh»). Text with EEA relevance. OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, p. 1-59. Electronic resource: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32012R0648 (accessed 29.06.2017).
17.	«O poetapnom vvedenii trebovaniya ob obyazatel'nom tsentralizovannom kliringe v otnoshenii standartizirovannykh vnebirzhevykh PFI». Itogovyi doklad, dekabr' 2016 goda. Bank Rossii. Moskva, 2016. Elektronnyi resurs: http://www.cbr.ru/statichtml/file/11526/report_pfi_161228.pdf (data obrashcheniya: 29.06.2017).
18.	SZ RF. 2011. № 7. St. 904; 2016. № 1 (ch. 1). St. 47. Sm.: Bashkatov M.L. Ispolnenie derivativnykh sdelok s pomoshch'yu tsentral'nogo kontragenta: postanovka problemy // Zakon. 2016. № 1; Burkova A.Yu. Trudnosti perekhoda na tsentralizovannyi kliring // Pravo i ekonomika. 2017. № 2; Tarasenko O.A. Tsentral'nyi kontragent: novelly pravovogo statusa // Pravo i ekonomika. 2016. № 3.
19.	Sm.: Malov G.A. Derivativy: nekotorye voprosy yuridicheskogo oformleniya // Yurist. 2015. № 6. S. 16.
20.	SZ RF. 2011. № 48. St. 6726; 2016. № 27 (ch. 1). St. 4225.
21.	Sm.: Rahman A. Over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives, central clearing and financial stability // Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin. 2015. Vol. 55. № 3. P. 291.
22.	Directive 2004/39/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 April 2004 on markets in financial instruments amending Council Directives 85/611/EEC and 93/6/EEC and Directive 2000/12/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Directive 93/22/EEC // OJ L 145, 30.4.2004, p. 1-44. Electronic resource: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2004/39/oj (accessed 29.06.2017). Sm.: Kriger A.M., Kas'yanov R.A. Osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya vnebirzhevykh proizvodnykh finansovykh instrumentov v ES // Finansovoe pravo. 2016. № 9; Prokudina N.V. Osobennosti pravovogo regulirovaniya rynka vnebirzhevykh derivativov v Evropeiskom Soyuze // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii. 2013. № 3.
23.	Sm.: Zemtsov D. Mezhdunarodnaya praktika transgranichnogo razmeshcheniya emissionnykh tsennykh bumag (cross-boarder offering) // Bankovskoe pravo. 2007. № 6. S. 30.
24.	White&Case European Margin Rules for Non-cleared OTC Derivatives – The Marging Big Bang. Electronic resource: https://www.whitecase.com/publications/article/european-margin-rules-non-cleared-otc-derivatives-margin-big-bang (accessed 05.05.2017).
25.	Natsional'nyi raschetnyi depozitarii, Sobytiya mezhdunarodnoi infrastruktury. Elektronnyi resurs: https://www.nsd.ru/common/img/uploaded/files/depo/138/44-45_smi.pdf (data obrashcheniya 05.05.2017).
26.	ISDA, Overview of US and EU OTC derivatives regulatory reforms 2014 Electronic resource: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/ Overview_of_USEU_Reforms_Final.pdf (accessed 30.04.2016).
27.	US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Electronic resource: https://www.sec.gov (accessed 29.06.2017).
28.	ISDA, Overview of US and EU OTC derivatives regulatory reforms 2014. Electronic resource: file:///C:/Users/user/Downloads/ Overview_of_USEU_Reforms_Final.pdf (accessed 30.04.2016).
29.	Sm.: Safonova T.Yu. Likvidatsionnyi netting kak sposob uregulirovaniya obyazatel'stv po proizvodnym finansovym instrumentam // Predprinimatel'skoe pravo. 2016. № 1. S. 20.
30.	SZ RF. 2002. № 43. St. 4190; 2016; № 27 (ch. 2). St. 4305.
31.	Sm.: Boguslavskii M.M. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo. M.: Norma. 2016. S. 604.
32.	Swiss Marine Corporation Ltd v OW Supply & Trading A/S (In Bankruptcy) [2015] EWHC 1571 (Comm) // Thomson Reuters Practical Law. Electronic resource: https://uk. practicallaw.thomsonreuters.com/D-033-2195?transitionType=Default& contextData=(sc.Default)&firstPage=true&bhcp=1 (accessed 30.04.2016); Armitage A., Brown T. “High Court refuses to grant anti-suit injunction restraining insolvency proceedings in Denmark” // Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP, 03.07.2015. Electronic resource: https://www.rpc.co.uk/perspectives/commercial-disputes/high-court-refuses-to-grant-anti-suit-injunction (accessed 29.06.2017).

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.