Феномен делокализации международного коммерческого арбитража

Правдина Арина Андреевна

doi:10.25136/2306-9899.2017.2.23161


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

International Law

Reference:

Pravdina A.A. — Phenomenon of delocalization of international commercial arbitration // International Law. – 2017. – № 2. – P. 7 - 18. DOI: 10.25136/2306-9899.2017.2.23161 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=23161

Phenomenon of delocalization of international commercial arbitration

Pravdina Arina Andreevna

Post-graduate student, National Research University “Higher School of Economics”

109028, Russia, Moscow, Bolshoy Trekhsvyatitelskiy Pereulok 3

pravdina.arin@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2306-9899.2017.2.23161

Review date:

29-05-2017

Publish date:

19-06-2017

Abstract.

The article discusses the phenomenon of delocalization of international commercial arbitration, its correlation with national law and order. The author analyzes various concepts of the idea of international commercial arbitration, the degree of autonomy of international arbitration, in particular the subject of analysis covers such issues as interference of national courts in the arbitration process, recognition of foreign arbitral awards and arbitrability of international commercial disputes. Special attention is paid to the study of the legal nature of international commercial arbitration as a specific form of justice. As methods of research, a comparative legal method, an analytical method, and a method of logical generalizations are used. With the help of these methods, the author formulates the definition of delocalization, which refers to the formation of a transnational legal regime that is not bound by national legal orders, but formed on their basis, the tendency to an absolutely independent autonomous regime. Thus, despite the fact that the independent nature of international commercial arbitration lies in its nature, along with the principle of autonomy of the will of the parties and contractual nature, arbitration cannot be completely independent of national legal orders, since they are the basis of its origin.
Keywords: autonomy of international arbitration, arbitrability, legal nature of arbitration, national judicial control, supranational order, extraterritoriality, transnational character, delocalization, international commercial arbitration, objective arbitrability
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Polsson J. Delocalisation of International Commercial Arbitration: When and Why It Matters // In: International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 1983. Vol. 32. N 1. P. 53-61. Elektronnyi resurs: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-and-comparative-law-quarterly/article/div-classtitledelocalisation-of-international-commercial-arbitration-when-and-why-it-mattersdiv/BF5E8DF19FCBA8719623CABAB0CC3913 (data obrashcheniya: 29.05.2017).
2.	Gaillard E. Three Philosophies of International Arbitration // In: Rovine A. (ed.) Contemporary Issues in International Arbitration and Mediation (The Fordham Papers 2009). Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2010. P. 306-307.
3.	Kurochkin S.A. Noveishie techeniya v zarubezhnoi doktrine mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha: kratkii obzor // Vestnik grazhdanskogo protsessa. 2015. № 6. S. 47.
4.	Tam zhe. S. 48.
5.	Paulsson J. The Idea of Arbitration (Clarendon Law Series). Oxford University Press, 2014. P. 1.
6.	Paulsson J. Arbitration in Three Dimensions // In: LSE Law, Society and Economy Working Papers. 2010. № 2. P. 3.
7.	Paulsson J. Arbitration in Three Dimensions // In: The International and Comparative Law Quarterly. 2011. Vol. 60. N 2. P. 291.
8.	Kurochkin S.A. Sovremennaya doktrina mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha: tendentsii razvitiya // Treteiskii sud. 2015. № 4. S. 91.
9.	Komissiya OON po pravu mezhdunarodnoi torgovli. Arbitrazhnyi reglament YuNSITRAL 2010 g. Elektronnyi resurs: http://www.uncitral.org/uncitral/ru/uncitral_texts/arbitration/2010Arbitration_rules.html (data obrashcheniya: 29.05.2017).
10.	ALC v. ALF [2010] SGHC 231 (The High Court of Singapore). Elektronnyi resurs: http://www.singaporelaw.sg/sglaw/laws-of-singapore/case-law/free-law/high-court-judgments/14258-alc-v-alf-2010-sghc-231 (data obrashcheniya: 29.05.2017).
11.	Roodt C. Reflections on Finality in Arbitration // In: De Jure. 2012. P. 488-489.
12.	Rekomendatsii Assotsiatsii mezhdunarodnogo prava po voprosam lis pendens, res judicata i arbitrazha 2006 g. Elektronnyi resurs: http://www.ila-hq.org/download.cfm/docid/6B3CC412-3CCE-47FD-8E85F3E4F6252D08 (data obrashcheniya: 29.05.2017). Asoskov A.V. Kommentarii k Rekomendatsiyam Assotsiatsii mezhdunarodnogo prava o primenenii doktrin lis pendens i res judicata v otnoshenii arbitrazha: osnovnye polozheniya i perspektivy ispol'zovaniya v rossiiskoi praktike // Mezhdunarodnyi kommercheskii arbitrazh. 2008. № 2. S. 74-98.
13.	Evropeiskaya Konventsiya o vneshnetorgovom arbitrazhe. Zheneva. 1961 g. Elektronnyi resurs: http://www.tks.ru/jur/0010000010 (data obrashcheniya: 29.05.2017).
14.	Hong-Lin Yu. Commercial Arbitration: The Scottish and International Perspectives. Edinburgh University Press, 2011 (Chapter 5. Party Autonomy and Its Restrictions, p. 67-96).
15.	Kurochkin S.A. Sovremennaya doktrina mezhdunarodnogo arbitrazha: kratkii obzor osnovnykh napravlenii razvitiya sistemy transnatsional'noi yurisdiktsii // Zakon. 2015. № 10. S. 7.
16.	SZ RF. 2016. № 1 (ch. 1). St. 2.
17.	Rumak V. Proekty Minyusta pytayutsya sdelat' vazhnyi shag v storonu formirovaniya v Rossii soobshchestva arbitrazhnykh professionalov [Interv'yu s A.I. Muranovym] // Zakon. 2014. № 4. S. 48-61.
18.	ICC ICA. Elektronnyi resurs: https://iccwbo.org/dispute-resolution-services/arbitration/icc-international-court-arbitration/ (data obrashcheniya: 29.05.2017).
19.	AAA ICDR. Elektronnyi resurs: https://www.icdr.org/icdr/faces/home;jsessionid=LChPGD0u2HeoDxB_df5lY6GHUq (data obrashcheniya: 29.05.2017).
20.	LCIA. Elektronnyi resurs: http://www.lcia.org/LCIA/introduction.aspx (data obrashcheniya: 29.05.2017).
21.	SCC AI. Elektronnyi resurs: http://www.sccinstitute.com/ (data obrashcheniya: 29.05.2017).
22.	Erpyleva N.Yu. Mezhdunarodnoe chastnoe pravo: Uchebnik. M: Izdatel'skii dom Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2015. S. 606.
23.	Hong-Lin Yu. Op. cit. P. 105.
24.	Konventsiya o zashchite prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod 1950 g. (s izm. 1994 g.) Elektronnyi resurs: http://www.echr.ru/documents/doc/2440800/2440800-001.htm (data obrashcheniya: 29.05.2017).
25.	Polichar B.M. Hanging by a Thread: Finding Arbitrability without Clear Evidence of a Contract // Business Law Today. July 2011. P. 1-6.
26.	Mistelis L., Brekoulakis S. (eds.) Arbitrability: International and Comparative Perspectives (International Arbitration Law Library Series). Kluwer Law International, 2009. P. 3-4.
27.	Born G. International Commercial Arbitration: 2 vols. Kluwer Law International, 2009. (Vol. 1, Chapter 5(F). Non-Arbitrability Doctrine, p. 769-840).
28.	Kurochkin S.A. Noveishie techeniya v zarubezhnoi doktrine mezhdunarodnogo kommercheskogo arbitrazha: kratkii obzor. S. 57; Mistelis L. The Settlement-Enforcement Dynamic in International Arbitration // In: American Review of International Arbitration. 2008. Vol. 19. N 3-4; Brekoulakis S. Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards: Observations on the Efficiency of the Current System and the Gradual Development of Alternative Means of Enforcement // In: American Review of International Arbitration. 2008. Vol. 19. N 3-4.
29.	SZ RF. 2002. № 30. St. 3012; 2017. № 17. St. 2458.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.