О некоторых особенностях применения понятия «обход закона» в международном частном праве Германии

Щёкина Елизавета Геннадьевна

doi:10.7256/2306-9899.2016.3.20503


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

International Law

Reference:

Shchekina E. — On certain peculiarities of the notion “circumvention of law” in the private international law of Germany // International Law. – 2016. – № 3. – P. 19 - 27. DOI: 10.7256/2306-9899.2016.3.20503 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=20503

On certain peculiarities of the notion “circumvention of law” in the private international law of Germany

Shchekina Elizaveta

Post-graduate student, Moscow State Institute of International Relations under the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation; Senior Lawyer, Research and Production Corporation “United Wagon Company”

115184, Russia, Moscow, Novokuznetskaya Street 7/11, building #1

eli-schyokina@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2306-9899.2016.3.20503

Review date:

23-09-2016

Publish date:

03-10-2016

Abstract.

The subject of this article is the problem of the circumvention of law in the private international law of Germany. The author analyzes the positions of some contemporary German researchers pertaining to the question of circumvention of law and the criteria for its determination, as well as court decisions on this matter. The author raises a question on correlation between the circumvention of law and choice of law applicable to legal relation, as well as examines this problem in the context of the notion of autonomy of the parties. The separate groups of legal relations, for which according to the German judicial practice is characteristic the problem of circumvention of law, are being highlighted. The author’s main contribution into the development of the examined topic consists in the study of the position of certain German authors, who have not previously been covered in the Russian literature. During the course of this research, the author described the fundamental principles that serve as a guidelines for the German courts in dispute resolution with the presence of foreign component with regards to the question of circumvention of law.
Keywords: teleological interpretation, choice of law, Germany, party autonomie, circumvention of law, private international law, conflict of laws, family disputes, proper law, public order
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Einführungsgsetz zum Bürgerlichen Gesetzbuche, ab 18.08.1896, in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 21. September 1994 (BGBl. I S. 2494; 1997 I S. 1061)
2.	Verordnung (EG) Nr. 593/2008 Des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 17 Juni 2008 über das auf vertragliche Schuldverhältnisse anzuwendende Recht (Rom I), Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union, L 177/6 4.7.2008
3.	Verordnung (EG) Nr. 864/2007 Des Europäischen Parlaments und des Rates vom 11. Juli 2007 über das auf außervertragliche Schuldverhältnisse anzuwendende Recht („Rom II“), Amtsblatt der Europäischen Union L 199/40 31.7.2007
4.	A. I. Muranov «O teorii «obkhoda zakona». Yuridicheskii pamflet», elektr. zhurnal Legal Insite, URL: http://legalinsight.ru/evasion-of-law/ (data obrashcheniya 20 sentyabrya 2016)
5.	Muranov A.I. ««Obkhod zakona» v mezhdunarodnom chastnom prave: mnimost' aktual'nosti i nadumannost' problem» // Zakonodatel'stvo. 2004. № 7, 8 (SPS Garant). 18 s.
6.	Muranov A.I. «Problema «obkhoda zakona» v material'nom i kollizionnom prave»: dissertatsiya na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata yuridicheskikh nauk: 12.00.03. M., 1999. 272 s.
7.	Grazhdanskii Kodeks Rossiiskoi Federatsii, ot 26.11.2001, № 146-FZ, "Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF", 03.12.2001, N 49, po sostoyaniyu na 01 sentyabrya 2016.
8.	Eugenia Kurzynsky-Singer “Das Verbot der Gesetzumgehung im deutschen Recht als ein potentielles legal transplant”, Max Planck Private Law Research Paper № 14/9, Mohr Siebeck, 2014, str. 90-94
9.	Martina Benecke “Gesetzumgehung im Zivilrecht”, Mohr Siebeck, Tübingen, 2004, str. 232-264
10.	Reshenie OLG Hamburg, 22.9.95-2U 29/94, NJW – RR 1996, 203
11.	Reshenie BGH, 05.11.1980 – VIII ZR 230/79
12.	Reshenie 11.11.1980 – 8 W 173/80, IPRspr 1980, Nr. 12 (S. 47);
13.	Reshenie 18.12.1981 – 8W 215/81, IPRspr 1981, Nr. 12 (S.30)
14.	Reshenie DFR – BverfGE 31, 58 – Spanier Beschluss
15.	Reshenie AG Düsseldorf 19.2.91-ß 266 F 172/90, IPRax 1991, 346
16.	Reshenie 19 U 180/96 21.03.1997
17.	Reshenie BGH, 15.11.1976 – VIII ZR 76/75, DB 1977, 253
18.	Milan Pak “Die Parteiautonomie in internationalen Kaufverträgen”, Haague, Springer Science + Business Media, 1967, str. 50-52
19.	Ian Kropholler “Internationales Privatrrecht”, 6 Aufl.b Tübingen, Mohr Siebeck, 2001, str. 151-158
20.	Reshenie BAG, Urteil vom 22. 10. 2015 – 2 AZR 720/14 (lexetius.com/2015,4664)
21.	Reshenie Landesarbeitsgericht Köln (DE) 06.11.1998-11 Sa 345/98
22.	Podshivalov T.P. Doktrina snyatiya korporativnoi vuali v sudebnoi praktike po sporam s ofshornymi kompaniyami // Mezhdunarodnoe pravo i mezhdunarodnye organizatsii / International Law and International Organizations. 2015. № 1. C. 32-37. DOI: 10.7256/2226-6305.2015.1.13927.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.