Статья 'Международно-правовое сотрудничество в сфере прав и свобод человека: плюрализм доктринальных оснований' - журнал 'Международное право' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
International Law
Reference:

International legal cooperation in the area of human rights and liberties: pluralism of doctrinal foundations

Shugurov Mark Vladimirovich

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of International law, Saratov State Law Academy

410056, Russia, g. Saratov, ul. Vol'skaya, 1, of. 621

shugurovs@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2306-9899.2015.3.16062

Review date:

05-08-2015


Publish date:

06-09-2015


Abstract.

The subject of this research is the idealistic processes within the conceptual dimension of international legal cooperation in the area of human rights. The author explores the experience of doctrinal conventionalism in a bipolar world. A special attention is given to the analysis of discussions regarding the source of the human rights and liberties – human dignity – within international legal perspective. The author analyzes the institution of resolution of disputes on interpretation of the positions of international conventions on human rights as an instrument of introduction of definiteness into the international legal positions and optimization of international cooperation. Among the main conclusions is the position on the need to harmonize the diverse doctrinal positions as a necessary condition for improving the efficiency of international legal cooperation in the area of ensuring protection and respect of the internationally recognized human rights and liberties. The scientific novelty consists in the substantiation of the need for actors of international legal defense community to give more attention to the transition towards consensually agreed upon pluralism of different concepts of human rights, which is needed in order to strengthen the internationally recognized human rights as a foundation for sustainable development.

Keywords: international organizations, domestic law, conceptual pluralism, cooperation of states, human dignity, international law, globalization, sustainable development, consensus, legal diversity
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Hopgood S. The Endtimes of Human Rights. Ithaca, New York, 2013.
2.
Moyn S. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, 2012.
3.
Chandler D. Contemporary Critiques of Human Rights // Goodhart M. (ed.). Human Rights Politics and Practice, 2nd ed. Oxford, 2013.
4.
Donelly J. (ed.) Universal Human Rights in Theory and Practice. 3rd ed. Ithaca, New York, 2013.
5.
Longlois A. J. Normative and Theoretical Foundation of Human Rights // Goodhart M. (ed.). Human Rights Politics and Practice, 2nd ed. Oxford, 2013.
6.
Tunkin G. I. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava. M., 1970.
7.
Tunkin G. I. Ideologicheskaya bor'ba i mezhdunarodnoe pravo. M., 1967.
8.
Tsit. po: Myullerson R. A. Prava cheloveka: idei, normy, real'nost'. M, 1991.
9.
Rybakov Yu. M. Vooruzhennaya agressiya – tyagchaishee mezhdunarodnoe prestuplenie. M., 1982.
10.
Cassese A. International Law. Oxford, 2001.
11.
Malevich Yu. I. Prava cheloveka v global'nom mire. M., 2004.
12.
Lukashuk I. I. Globalizatsiya, gosudarstvo, pravo, XXI vek. M., 2000.
13.
Prava cheloveka kak faktor strategii ustoichivogo razvitiya / Otv. red. E. A. Lukasheva. M., 2000.
14.
Khabrieva T. Ya., Chirkin V. E. Teoriya sovremennoi konstitutsii. M., 2005.
15.
Tunkin G. I. Pravo i sila v mezhdunarodnoi sisteme. M., 1983.
16.
Tikhomirov Yu. A. Kollizionnoe pravo. M., 2000.
17.
Glukhareva L. A. Prava cheloveka: gumanitarnyi kurs. M., 2002. S. 152.
18.
Blishchenko I. P., Solntseva M. M. Mirovaya politika i mezhdunarod-noe pravo. M., 1991.
19.
Kartashkin V. Mezhdunarodnaya bezopasnost' i prava cheloveka. M., 1988.
20.
Baylis Ch. Towards an International Bill of Rights. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 8:2 (Summer 1944), pp. 244-253.
21.
Ruth B. Russel A History of the United Nations Charter: The Role of the United States, 1940 – 1945. Washington, 1958.
22.
Vseobshchaya deklaratsiya prav cheloveka i osnovnykh svobod: 45-ya godov-shchina. Parizh, 1994.
23.
Sm.: Prava cheloveka: itogi veka, tendentsii, perspektivy / Pod obshch. red. E. A. Lukashevoi. M., 2002.
24.
Mingazov L. Kh. Effektivnost' norm mezhdunarodnogo prava. Kazan', 1991.
25.
Kartashkin V. Mezhdunarodnaya zashchita prav cheloveka. M., 1976.
26.
Aron R. Mir i voina mezhdu narodami. M., 2000.
27.
Montgomery J. W. The Marxist Approach to Human Right Analysis and Critique. California, 1984.
28.
Posner E. The Twilight of Human Rights Law. Oxford, 2014.
29.
Cruft R., Liao S. M. Philosophical Foundations of Human Rights. Ox-ford, 2015.
30.
Carbonari P. Human Dignity as a Basic Concept of Ethics and Human Rights // Dignity and Human Rights: The Implementation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. Ed. by P. Carbonari. Antwerp; Oxford; N.Y., 2002.
31.
Chalmers D., Ida R. On the International Legal Aspects of Human Dignity // Perspectives of Human Dignity. A Conversation. Ed. by Malpas J., Lickiss N. Dordrecht, 2007.
32.
Kateb G. Human Dignity. Cambridge (Massachusetts), 2011.
33.
McDougle M., Lasswell N., Chen C. Human Rights and World Public Or-der: The Basic Policies of an International Law of Human Dignity. New Haven, 1980.
34.
McDougal M. Perspectives for an International Law of Human Dignity // Studies in World Public Order. Ed. by M. McDougal, W. Burke. New Haven, 1987.
35.
Schacter O. Human Dignity as a Normative Concept // American Journal of International Law. Vol. 77. 1983.
36.
Griffin J. On Human Rights. Oxford; N.Y., 2009.
37.
AbduLlakh ibn Abd al'-Mukhsin at-Turki Islam i prava cheloveka. Er-Riyad, 2008.
38.
Donelly J. Human Rights and Human Dignity: An Analitic Critique of Non-Western Sonception of Human Rights // The American Political Science Review. 1992. Vol. 76.
39.
Deklaratsiya o pravakh i dostoinstve cheloveka X Russkogo narodnogo sobora // http://venec-vl.ru/vrns (data obrashcheniya: 2.08.2015).
40.
Kalamkaryan R. A. Povedenie gosudarstv v Mezhdunarodnom sude OON: mezhdunarodno-pravovye problemy sudebno-arbitrazhnogo proizvodstva. M., 1999.
41.
Meuwissen D. H. The Relationship Between International Law and Mu-nicipal Law and Fundemantal rights. Netherlands International Law Review, 1977. Vol. XX1V, pp. 204-224.
42.
Kulikov R. O mezhdunarodno-pravovoi otvetstvennosti za narushenie prav cheloveka. M., 1979.
43.
Lukashuk I. I., Lukashuk O. I. Tolkovanie norm mezhdunarodnogo prava. M., 2002.
44.
Problemy teorii gosudarstva i prava. M., 1979.
45.
Chernichenko S. V. Lichnost' i mezhdunarodnoe pravo. M., 1974.
46.
Obshchaya teoriya prav cheloveka. M., 1996.
47.
Tsit. po: Tolstykh V. L. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo: praktika primeneniya. Konsul'tativnye zaklyucheniya Mezhdunarodnogo Suda OON. M., 2004.
48.
Varlamova N. V. Praktika Evropeiskogo Suda po pravam cheloveka kak vyrazhenie sovremennykh teoreticheskikh predstavlenii o prave // Vozmozhnosti adaptatsii zarubezhnogo opyta: sbornik nauchnykh statei. Seriya: Pravo Rossii: novye podkhody. Saratov, 2005. Vyp. 1.
49.
Zayavlyaem nashi prava. Kak ispol'zovat' mezhdunarodnuyu pravozashchitnuyu sistemu dlya okhrany prav zhenshchin. M., 1996.
50.
Kurs mezhdunarodnogo prava. V 7-mi t. M., 1989. T. 1.
51.
Feminist Cosequences: Theory for New Centiry. N.Y., 2001.
52.
Ackerly B. Feminist and Activist Approaches to Human Rights // Goodhart M. (ed.). Human Rights Politics and Practice, 2nd ed. Oxford, 2013. P. 27-41.
53.
Shachar A. Multicaltural Jurisdiction: Cultural Differenses and Womens Rights. Cambridge, 2001.
54.
Sm.: Kymlika W. Multicatural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. 2-d ed. Oxford, 1995.
55.
Multicultural Research: A Reflective Engagement with Race, Gender and Sexual Orientation // Ed. by Grant Carl. L., 1999.
56.
Postmodernizm. Entsiklopediya. Minsk, 2001. S. 637-638.
57.
Zivs S. Human rights: Continuing the Discussion. Moscow, 1980.
58.
Simonides Ya., Volodin V. Predislovie // Levin L. Prava cheloveka. Voprosy i otvety. Parizh, 1997.
59.
Meditsina i prava cheloveka. M., 1992.
60.
Charrin J.-B. Connecting Public International Law: International Human Rights Law as Sustainable Development Law – the Case of the Right to Water. Hamburg, 2010.
61.
Tladi D. Sustainable Development in International Law: An Analysis of Key Enviro-Economic Instruments. Pretoria, 2007.
62.
Kumar A. (ed.) Human Rights and Sustainable Development. New Delhi, 2006.
63.
French D. International Law and Policy of Sustainable Development. Manchester, 2005.
64.
Hildering A. International Law, Sustainable Development and Water Management. The Netherlands, 2004.
65.
Alston P., Goodman R. International Human Rights: The Successor to International human rights in context. Oxford, 2012.
66.
Konventsiya YuNESKO o zashchite i pooshchrenii raznoobraziya form kul'turnogo samovyrazheniya 2005 goda // http://www.un.org.ru/documents/decl_conv/conventions/pdf/cult_diversity.pdf
67.
Lauren P. G. The Evolution of International Human Rights Visions Seen. 3rd ed. Philadelphia, 2011.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website