по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
World Politics
Reference:

The U.S. military and political strategy in Asian-Pacific region
Khlopov Oleg Anatolyevich

PhD in Politics

Associate Professor at the American Studies Department of the Russian State University for the Humanities

125993, GSP-3, Russia, Moskva oblast', g. Moscow, Miusskaya ploshchad'., 6

rggu2007@rambler.ru

Abstract.

The research subject is the U.S.-China relations in the field of security. The research object is the peculiarities, the current state, the tendencies and the prospects of development of the U.S. strategy towards the growing and spreading military and strategic influence of China on the dynamics of processes in Asian-Pacific region. The author studies the content of the U.S. - China problems, the conflict potential and controversies in the field of military politics and military and political doctrines of the U.S. and China. The research is based on the paradigm of political neorealism proceeding from the assumption that the actors of international relations are sovereign states, and world politics and international relations are considered in terms of their systematicity. The main research method is the system approach. To describe the current content of the U.S.-China military and political relations, the author uses the comparative and historical research methods. The author formulates the conclusion that the U.S tries to avoid the revision of the regional status quo in the result of China’s ascending and the growth of its influence, by preserving and expanding military alliances and involving China into the military cooperation system. Against the background of the current economic and military and political controversies and differing understandings of the future world order, the politicians of the two countries try to avoid direct military conflicts based on the balance of forces and unavoidable strategic competition in Asian-Pacific region. 
 

Keywords: military cooperations, APR, USA, China, national interests, international relations, military alliances, security, defense, army

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8671.2019.3.30912

Article was received:

06-10-2019


Review date:

01-10-2019


Publish date:

07-11-2019


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Waltz K. Theory of International Politics. Waveland Press 2010. 256 p.
2.
Yunzhu Ya. Sino-American Military Relations: From Quasi-allies to Potential Adversaries? // China International Strategy Review. June 2019, Volume 1, Issue. pp 85–98.
3.
Khlopov O.A. Energeticheskaya politika i strategiya Kitaya // Vestnik MGOU. 2015, № 4. S. 118-128.
4.
A Regional Security Architecture Where Everyone Rises, May 30, 2015. US Department of Defense. URL: http://www.defense.gov/News/Speeches/Speech-View/Article/606676/iiss-shangri-la-dialogue-a-regional-security-architecture-where-everyone-rises.
5.
Pacific Air Forces A-10s, HH-60s Fly First Air Contingent Missions in Philippines. April 22, 2016 // US Pacific Command. URL: http://www.pacom.mil/Media/News/tabid/5693/Article/741238/pacific-air-forces-a-10s-hh-60s-fly-first-air-contingent-missions-in-philippines.aspx.
6.
Joint Press Conference by Secretary Carter and Secretary Gazmin in Manila, Philippines. April 14, 2016. US Department of Defense. URL: https://www.defense.gov/Newsroom/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/721687/joint-press-conference-by-secretary-carter-and-secretary-gazmin-in-manila-phili/
7.
Nuclear Posture Review.2018. US Department of Defense. URL: https://media.defense.gov/2018/Feb/02/2001872886/-1/-1/1/2018-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW-FINAL-REPORT.PDF.
8.
Kamennov P. B. KNR: voennaya politika na rubezhe vekov [Tekst] : [monografiya] Rossiiskaya akad. nauk, In-t Dal'nego Vostoka. Moskva : In-t Dal'nego Vostoka, 2008. 224 s.
9.
Kokoshin A. Voennaya reforma v KNR: voenno-strategicheskie, politicheskie i organizatsionno-upravlencheskie aspekty // Rossiiskii sovet po mezhdunarodnym delam 10.01.2017. URL: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/comments/voennaya-reforma-v-knr-voenno-strategicheskie-politicheskie-i-organizatsionno-upravlencheskie-aspekt/ .
10.
Mechanization and Informatization Are Dual Historical Tasks of Army Building, December 11, 2000, Jiang Zemin, Vol. III, Selected Works of Jiang Zemin (English edition), Beijing: Foreign Languages Press. 2013. R.157.
11.
Gertz B. The China Threat: How the People's Republic Targets America. Regnery Publishing. 2002. 280 p.
12.
Clinton H. America’s Pacific Century // Foreign Policy 2011. October 11. URL: https://foreignpolicy.com/2011/10/11/americas-pacific-century/ .
13.
Obama Administration Policy in the Asia-Pacific. April 28, 2016. // US Department of State. URL: http://www.state.gov/s/d/2016d/256694.htm .
14.
Graham. A. Destined for War: Can America and China Escape Thucydides’ Trap? Boston-New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt. 2017. 384 p.
15.
Liff Ad. P., Ikenberry G. Racing Toward Tragedy? China’s Rise, Military Competition in the Asia-Pacific and the Security Dilemma // International Security. Fall. 2014. Pp. 52–91.
16.
National Security Strategy of the United States of America. December 2017. The White House. URL: https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/NSS-Final-12-18-2017-0905.pdf
17.
National Defense Strategy. 2018. Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy of the United States of America. Department of Defense. URL: URL;: https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/pubs/2018-National-Defense-Strategy-Summary.pdf
18.
Missile Defense Review. Department of Defense. 2019. URL: https://media.defense.gov/2019/Jan/17/2002080666/-1/-1/1/2019-MISSILE-DEFENSE-REVIEW.PDF.
19.
Nuclear Posture Review.2018. US Department of Defense. URL: https://media.defense.gov/2018/Feb/02/2001872886/-1/-1/1/2018-NUCLEAR-POSTURE-REVIEW-FINAL-REPORT.PDF.
20.
Military and Security Developments Involving the People’s Republic of China. Annual Report to Congress. Department of Defense.2019. URL: https://media.defense.gov/2019/May/02/2002127082/-1/-1/1/2019_CHINA_MILITARY_POWER_REPORT.pdf.
21.
Kamenov P.B. KNR: voennaya politika v nachale XXI veka: monografiya. M.: IDV RAN, 2019. 248 s.
22.
Klimenko A.F., Kamenov P.B. Voennaya politika KNR i ee rol' v uvelichenii kompleksnoi moshchi gosudarstva // Problemy Dal'nego Vostoka. 2017. № 2. C.84.
23.
Grachikov E.N. Stanovlenie kitaiskoi shkoly mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: analiticheskie podkhody i metody issledovanii // Vestnik Rossiiskogo universiteta druzhby narodov. Seriya: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2019. T. 19.№ 2. S. 187-200. DOI: 10.22363/2313-0660-2019-19-2-187-200.
24.
Italiano L. Trump and Xi Jinping Agree to De-escalate Trade War // NyPost com June 29. 2019. URL: https://nypost.com/2019/06/29/trump-and-xi-jinping-agree-to-de-escalate-trade-war/.
25.
Ward J. China's Vision of Victory. Atlas Publishing and Media Company, 2019. 314 p.
26.
Fenby Jh. Will China Dominate the 21st Century? John Wiley & Sons. 2017. 144 p
27.
Wang Jisi. From Cooperative Partnership to Strategic Competition: a Review of China–US Relations 2009–2019 // China International Strategy Review. 2019, p 1-10.
28.
Minghao Zhao. Is a New Cold War Inevitable? Chinese Perspectives on US–China Strategic Competition // The Chinese Journal of International Politics. 2019. Volume 12 (3). Pp. 371–394.
29.
Heginbotham E., Nixon M., Morgan F.E., Heim J.L., Sheng Tao Li, Engstrom, J. . Libicki M.C., DeLuca P., Shlapak D.A., Frelinger D.R. Laird B., Brady K., Morris L.J. The US-China Military Scorecard: Forces, Geography and the Evolving Balance of Power (1996–2017). RAND Corporation. 2015. 430 p.
30.
Samuilov S.M. Rossiya i Kitai v politike administratsii Donal'da Trampa: vozvrashchenie k cherno-belomu traditsionalizmu // Rossiya i Amerika v XXI veke. 2018. № 1.URL: http://www.rusus.ru/?act=read&id=610 .
31.
Voskresenskii A.D. Novye tikhookeanskie strategii: vozmozhnost' ili real'nost'? vliyanie «kitaiskogo faktora» na obstanovku v Evrazii i Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskom regione // Sravnitel'naya politika. 2018. № 3. S. 128-145. DOI: 10.18611/2221-3279-2018-9-3-128-145.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website