Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
World Politics

The global vector of international relations
Ursul Arkadii Dmitrievich

Doctor of Philosophy

Head of the Center, Scholar at theof the Academy of Sciences of Moldova; Professor, Moscow State Univeristy

119991, Russia, Moscow, Leninskie Gory 1, building #51

Другие публикации этого автора



The author of the article notes that international processes have global potential, which hasn’t been completely revealed yet, and characteristics which determine their global orientation. Global features, potential and orientation of international processes manifest themselves through principles and general patterns involving all their participants and all the spheres of these social relations. Some international processes won’t gain global status at all, and the author defines the main criteria of their globallity. First of all, it is the qualitative-contensive criterion of globality as a spreading potential unity of particular social patterns, tendencies and principles. Besides, the author considers the spatial-geographical and the temporal criteria of globality, and the criterion connected with the problem of global safety. The author uses the global and the system approaches together with the integrative-interdisciplinary, historical and evolutionary approaches, the methods of scientific forecasting and futurology. Further inclusion of international relations into the process of solving global problems requires the improvement of supranational mechanisms of administration right up to the upcoming establishment of the global level of administration and the formation of global law and global values. The author makes a hypothesis that the phenomenon of statehood will keep the leading role not only in the transition to sustainable development, but also in other directions of the evolution of international processes. The author anticipates the development of international processes for the foreseeable future: the analysis of possible evolution of state as a key subject of international relations implies further development of these relations in terms of spreading sustainable development of humanity on the planet and beyond. 

Keywords: world politics, nternational relations, cultural genesis, criteria of globality, state, global problems, globalization, global law, globalization processes, sustainable development



Article was received:


Review date:


Publish date:


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

Ursul T.A., Ursul A.D. Stanovlenie global'nogo mira. Puti i perspektivy. Saarbrücken: Palmarium Academic Pablishing, 2019. 205 s.
Ursul A.D. Stanovlenie nauki o global'nom mire // Sotsiodinamika. 2018. № 10. S.61-67. DOI: 10.25136/2409-7144.2018.10.27446. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/pr/article_27446.html
Shakhalilov Sh.Sh. Istoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii: dvizhushchie sily, global'nye tendentsii. Moskva, Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2015. 560 s.
Sayamov Yu.N. Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya v kontekste global'nykh protsessov. Moskva, Izvestiya. 2018. 448 c.
Tsygankov P.A. Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. Moskva, Gardariki. 2003. 590 s.
Ursul A.D. Information nature of evolution and development of the world: conceptual hypothesis // Automatic Documentation and Mathematical Linguistics. 2019. vol. 53. № 01. R. 9–15. DOI: 10.3103/S0005105519010060
Baranovskii V.G., Ivanova N.I., otv. red. Global'noe upravlenie: vozmozhnosti i riski. Moskva, IMEMO RAN, 2015. 314 s.
Baburin S.N., Ursul A.D. Politika ustoichivogo razvitiya i gosudarstvenno-pravovoi protsess. Moskva, Magistr, INFRA-M, 2010. 557 s.
Ursul A.D. Globalizatsiya prava i global'noe pravo: kontseptual'no-metodologicheskie problemy // Pravo i politika. 2012. № 8. S..1284-1297.
Global Risks Report, 2019. 14th Edition. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2019. 114 p. // URL: https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2019
Bogaturov A.D. Ponyatiya i metodologiya analiza // Covremennaya mirovaya politika: Prikladnoi analiz. Pod. red. Bogaturova A.D. Moskva,Aspekt-Press, 2010. 592 s.
Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. United Nations, 2015. 45 p. // URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015
Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A., Dugarova M. New Goals of Sustainable Future // Philosophy and Cosmology. Vol. 18. 2017. R.37-50
Bobylev S. Ustoichivoe razvitie: paradigma dlya budushchego // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya, 2017, № 3, t. 61, C. 107-113. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-3-107-113
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website