по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
World Politics
Reference:

From global development to a global world
Ursul Arkadii Dmitrievich

Doctor of Philosophy

Head of the Center, Scholar at theof the Academy of Sciences of Moldova; Professor, Moscow State Univeristy

119991, Russia, Moscow, Leninskie Gory 1, building #51

ursul-ad@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

Abstract.

The formation of a global world is reflected and discussed in science forming the new direction - global studies. However, some key terms discussed further haven’t been thoroughly developed despite being widely used in publications. Therefore, the article gives special attention to the problem of defining the notions “global development” and “global world” in their broad and narrow senses. Besides, the global direction of science is still lukewarm about the studies of sustainable development in its global dimension, and it is important to connect the above mentioned research areas in the context of the global world achieving. The author uses the set of general scientific methods including conceptual modeling, the global, interdisciplinary and systems approaches, the historical and evolutionary approach, the hypothetical and deductive method, forecasting and other methods of studying the future. The author shows that the global world is formed under the influence of both the human activities and the natural factors - global processes and restrictions. On the way of its formation it is necessary to solve the main social and natural contradiction - the biosphere of the planet is not always able to satisfy the continuously growing demands of the humanity which leads to the limits of global development and can result in a global disaster. That is why it is important for the global development, which is determined to solve this contradiction, to be sustainable development which the global society is already oriented at. Ultimately, the authors suggest understanding the global world as a mature form of global development and social and natural interaction which can be achieved in the future by means of the transition to global sustainability.  

Keywords: global processes, global problems, globalization, global world, global cluster of knowledge, global studies, global development, global sustainability, globalistics, sustainable development

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8671.2018.4.28334

Article was received:

10-12-2018


Review date:

12-12-2018


Publish date:

09-01-2019


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Kuvaldin V.B. Global'nyi mir: politika, ekonomika, sotsial'nye otnosheniya. M.: Ves' mir. 2017. 400 s.
2.
Chernysheva E.N. Global'nyi mir: osobennosti i problemy razvitiya // Vestnik Volgogradskogo gosudarstvennogo un-ta. Seriya 7. Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya i sotsial'nye tekhnologii. 2015. № 4 (30). S.23-27. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/jvolsu7.2015.4.3
3.
Ursul A.D. Stanovlenie global'nogo mira i perekhod k ustoichivomu budushchemu // Mirovaya politika. 2017 . № 3. S.92-102. DOI: 10.25136/2409-8671.2017.3.23454
4.
Chumakov A.N. Global'nyi mir: stolknovenie interesov. M.: Prospekt. 2018. 448 s.
5.
Ursul A.D. Evolyutsionnaya globalistika. M.: MAKSPress. 2012. 57 s.
6.
Il'in I.V., Ursul A.D., Ursul T.A. Global'nyi evolyutsionizm: Idei, problemy, gipotezy. M.: MGU. 2012. 616 s.
7.
Beck U. Was ist Globalisierung? Irrtümer des Globalismus – Antworten auf Globalisierung, Frankfurt am Main, Suhrkamp Verlag, 1997. 267 s.
8.
Robertson R. Glocalization: Time-Space and Homogeneity-Heterogeneity. Global Modernities. Featherstone M., Lash S. & Robertson R., eds. London, Sage Publications, 1995. Pp. 25-44.
9.
Roudometof V. Glocalization: A Critical Introduction. London and New York: Routledge, 2016. xv + 188 pp.
10.
Yakovlev P. «Faktor Trampa» i menyayushchiisya oblik globalizatsii // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2017. №7. t.61. S. 5-14. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-7-5-14
11.
Ryabchenko N.P. Ot globalizatsii k global'noi tsivilizatsii. Vladivostok: Dal'nauka, 2012. 263 s.
12.
Meadows D. et al. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: University Books, 1972. Available at: http://www.donellameadows.org/wp-content/userfiles/Limits-to-Growth-digital-scanversion.pdf (accessed 11.12.2018).
13.
Kontseptsiya perekhoda Rossiiskoi Federatsii k ustoichivomu razvitiyu: Ukaz Prezidenta RF № 440 ot 01.04.96 // Sobranie zakonodatel'stva RF. 1996. № 15. St. 1572.
14.
Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. Available at: http://www.un-documents.net/rio-dec.htm (accessed 11.12.2018).
15.
Nashe obshchee budushchee: Doklad Mezhdunarodnoi komissii po okruzhayushchei srede i razvitiyu. M.: Progress, 1989. 375 s.
16.
United Nations Conference on Environment & Development. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3 to 14 June 1992. AGENDA 21. 351 p. Available at: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/Agenda21.pdf (accessed 11.12.2018).
17.
Jackson P. Introduction: Security and Development // Handbook of International Security and Development. Jackson P., ed. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2015, Pp. 1-18.
18.
Bartenev V.I. Svyazka «bezopasnost'–razvitie» v sovremennykh zapadnykh issledovaniyakh: ot dekonstruktsii k kontseptualizatsii // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. 2015. t. 13, № 3, S. 78-97.
19.
Yudin N. Svyazka «bezopasnost'–razvitie»: problemy i perspektivy instrumentalizatsii // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2017. № 9. t. 61, S. 16-23. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-9-16-23
20.
Bobylev S. Ustoichivoe razvitie: paradigma dlya budushchego // Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. 2017. № 3, t. 61, C. 107-113. DOI: 10.20542/0131-2227-2017-61-3-107-113
21.
Budushchee, kotorogo my khotim. Itogovyi dokument Konferentsii OON po ustoichivomu razvitiyu. Rio-de-Zhaneiro, Braziliya. 20–22 iyunya 2012 goda. OON, 2012. 66 s.
22.
Baranovskii V.G., Ivanova N.I., otv. red. Global'noe upravlenie: vozmozhnosti i riski. M.: IMEMO RAN, 2015. 314 s.
23.
Preobrazovanie nashego mira: Povestka dnya v oblasti ustoichivogo razvitiya na period do 2030 goda. OON, 2015. 45 s. // URL: https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website