Статья 'Формат миротворческих миссий в условиях современного геополитического противостояния' - журнал 'Мировая политика' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
World Politics
Reference:

The format of peacekeeping missions in the context of the contemporary geopolitical confrontation

Kovalev Andrei Andreevich

PhD in Politics

Associate Professor at the North-West Institute of Management, branch of RANEPA

199178, Russia, Sankt-Peterburg oblast', g. Saint Petersburg, ul. Srednii Prospekt, V.o., 57/43

senator23@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8671.2017.3.23867

Review date:

12-08-2017


Publish date:

12-10-2017


Abstract.

The research subject is peacekeeping missions as an instrument of modern international and domestic conflicts. The author considers the problem the conflict phenomena in the modern political process. Special attention is given to the analysis of instruments of regulation of international and domestic military and political conflicts and the role of peacekeeping operations in this process. The author defines various approaches to understanding the essence of peacekeeping and a peacekeeping operations and their place in the modern international relations system. The multifaceted nature of the problem under study determines the methodology as a set of interrelated principles of cognition and research methods, realized on the base of popular synergetic and praxeological approaches to assessing and analyzing foreign policy problems of security. particularly, the author uses the set of recognized in political science cognitive principles, such as integrity, objectivity, historicism and alternativeness. Practical importance of the acquired results consists in deep and complex understanding of foreign policy of modern states in terms of collective security. The author’s conclusions and evaluations can be used for further consideration of the security component in foreign policy of a modern state for the purpose of studying the role of this aspect in the modern architecture of the European, Euro-Atlantic and global security. The author carries out the political analysis of evolution of international foreign policy in the sphere of security and defense in order to define the role and purpose of peacekeeping missions in the process of political and military conflicts settlement. The author analyzes various opinions about understanding the essence of peacekeeping and peacekeeping operations; considers the role of such operations within the modern international relations system; characterizes the essence of domestic and inter-state conflicts; presents the principles of peacekeeping operations. 

Keywords: stabilization of the political system, state security, military-political conflict, collective security, peacekeeping, peacekeeping mission, UN, armed conflict, war, institutional mechanism
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Chernichenko S.V. Teoriya mezhdunarodnogo prava / S.V. Chernichenko. – M.: NIMP, 1999. – T.2 – s.185.
2.
Rybakov Yu.M. Diplomatiya // Yu.M. Rybakov. – M.: Vostok-Zapad, 2010. – s.443.
3.
Tsygankov P.A. Bezopasnost': Kooperativnaya ili korporativnaya. Kriticheskii analiz mezhdunarodno-politicheskoi kontseptsii / P.A. Tsygankov // Politicheskie issledovaniya. – 2000. – № 3. – S. 128-140.
4.
Zverev P. G. Uroki 1990-kh godov i ikh vliyanie na formirovanie doktriny mezhdunarodnogo mirotvorchestva OON / P. G. Zverev // Aktual'nye problemy gumanit. i estestv. nauk. – 2014. – № 72.– S. 28–30.
5.
Oznobishchev S.K., Nikitin A.I. Est' li budushchee u kontrolya nad vooruzheniyami? Moskva, ROSSPEN, 2013. - 280 s.
6.
Alekseeva T.A. Sovremennaya politicheskaya mysl' (XX–XXI vv.). Politicheskaya teoriya i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. Moskva, Aspekt-Press, 2015. - 623 s.
7.
Guliev M.A. Tolerantnost' i mirotvorchestvo: Izd-vo SKNTs VSh. – Rostov – na-Donu:, 2006. – 288 s.
8.
Babadzhanov A. Ya. Voenno-politicheskoe sotrudnichestvo postsovetskikh gosudarstv: problema sochetaemosti natsional'nykh podkhodov : nauch. izd. / A. Ya. Babadzhanov. – M. : Aspekt Press, 2013. – 256 s.
9.
Sari A. UN Peacekeeping Operations and Article 7 ARIO: the Missing Link // International Organizations Law Review. 2013. Vol. 9. P. 77.
10.
Dannenbaum T. Translating the Standard of Effective Control into a System of Effective Accountability: How Liability Should Be Apportioned for Violations of Human Rights by Member State Troop Contingents Serving as United Nations Peacekeepers // Harvard International Law Journal, 2010. P. 159.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website