Статья 'Мировая политика и негосударственные участники международных отношений ' - журнал 'Мировая политика' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial board
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
World Politics
Reference:

World politics and non-state actors of international relations

Karpovich Oleg Gennad'evich

Doctor of Politics

Deputy Director of the Insitute, Institue of Stategic Research and Forecasting of the People's Friendship University of Russia

101000, Russia, Moscow, Mikluho-Maklaya Street 6

karpovich40@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8671.2017.3.22927

Review date:

06-05-2017


Publish date:

12-10-2017


Abstract.

The article studies the role and place of non-state actors within the international relations system and world politics. The research object is the system of world politics, the research subject is the role and place of non-state actors of international relations – “actors beyond sovereignty” in world politics. The purpose of the research is to define the role and place of non-state actors (including special subjects of world politics – non-governmental organizations and trans-national corporations) within the system of world politics. The research methodology is based on the system, structural-functional, comparative-political approaches, the methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction and observation. The author gives attention to the fact that in contemporary world politics, non-state actors play a special role: their “intervention” into the international relations sphere has led to complete transformation of fundamental principles of international politics, emergence of global politics, erosion of sovereignty and borders of nation-states and their loss of monopoly on relations between nations and peoples. Trans-national corporations are among the most active non-state actors. In their form and mode of existence they are not specialized actors: they can successfully embed into any vacant political niches and play any roles using the support of nation-states. TNCs create specialized subordinate branches – political movements, parties, fractions, blocks, which they use to solve particular problems. Contemporary TNCs consider political activity as a natural continuation of project activity, which is a natural component of any business. Solution of political problems via bargaining based on equivalent exchange is a typical style of TNCs, which they stick to in the sphere of political relations. In response to non-state actors “intervention” into world politics, the system of conventional actors of international relations dynamically transforms begetting new forms of participation of nation-states in global political processes and new forms of inter-state interaction, which suit the changed conditions of competition and the international relations system’s evolution trends. 

Keywords: diplomacy, international relations, U.S. foreign policy, world politics, global information space, political system, interests, state, seсurity, risks
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Tsygankov P.A. O soderzhanii termina «mezhdunarodnyi aktor»: vklad sotsiologii // Prostranstvo i vremya v mirovoi politike i mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh. Materialy 4-go Konventa Rossiiskoi assotsiatsii mezhdunarodnykh issledovanii. V 10 t. Tom 1: Aktory v prostranstve i vremeni mirovoi politiki / Pod obshchei red. A.Yu. Mel'vilya; red. toma M.M. Lebedeva.-M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2007.
2.
Tsygankov P.A. Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. M., 2002.
3.
Tsygankov P.A. Tsygankov A.P. Politicheskaya sotsiologiya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. [Elektronnyi dokument] / Biblioteka Gumer. Politologiya. URL: http://www.gumer.info/bibliotek_Buks/Polit/cugan/08.php (Data obrashcheniya: 12.05.2017)
4.
Shagabieva E.M. Mezhdunarodnye nepravitel'stvennye organizatsii: ikh vidy, osobennosti, kategorii i kharakteristika // Vlast'. 2010. № 9.-s. 94-96.
5.
Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya: teorii, konflikty, dvizheniya, organizatsii. Izdanie 2-e, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe. / Pod red. Tsygankova P. A. — M. : Al'fa-M, Infa-M, 2007. S. 166.
6.
Zakariya F. Postamerikanskii mir. – M.: Izd-vo "Evropa". 2009.
7.
Smouts M.-C., Battistella D., Vennesson P. Dictionnaire des relations internationales. Approches. Concepts. Doctrines. – Paris, Dalloz, 2003, r.379.
8.
Tsygankov P.A. Negosudarstvennye uchastniki mirovoi politiki: vzaimodeistvie s gosudarstvami i mezhpravitel'stvennymi organizatsiyami. // Mir i Politika. 2013. №10. S. 262.
9.
Piters Gai. Globalizatsiya, upravlenie i ego instituty. // Otechestvennye zapiski № 2 (16) 2004. url: http://www.strana-oz.ru/?numid=17&article=808
10.
International Studies and the Social Sciences: Problems, Priorities and Prospectsin the United States. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Rosenau, James N. (1974)
11.
Lebedeva M.M. Predmetnoe pole i predmetnye polya mirovoi politiki. [Elektronnyi dokument] / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. URL: http://www.intertrends.ru/five/008.htm (Data obrashcheniya 04.05.2017)
12.
Tsygankov P.A. Mirovaya politicheskaya dinamika sovremennogo mira. Teoriya i praktika. M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2014. 576 s. (Biblioteka fakul'teta politologii MGU). S. 50-51.
13.
Samy Cohen. La Résistance des États. La démocratie face aux défis de la mondialisationé Éd. du Seuil, 2003, p.18-57.
14.
Kuznetsov A.V. Investitsionnye rekordy rossiiskikh TNK v 2007 godu. [Elektronnyi dokument] / Fond istoricheskoi perspektivy, 2008, 12 mar. URL: http://www.perspektivy.info/print.php?ID=36264 (Data obrashcheniya 18.05.2017)
15.
Manoilo A.V. Nesilovoe regulirovanie mezhdunarodnykh konfliktov. Kul'turno-tsivilizatsionnye paradigmy. // Kosmopolis.-2008.-№2. – S.168-174.
16.
Manoilo A.V. Rol' tsvetnykh revolyutsii v demontazhe sovremennykh politicheskikh rezhimov // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. – 2014. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/2073-8560.2014.3.12058
17.
Filippov V.R. Etnichnost' i vlast' v stolichnom megapolise. M., 2009. Ser. Buntuyushchaya etnichnost'.-240 s.
18.
Filippova E.I., Filippov V.R. Gornyi Altai. Mezhnatsional'nye otnosheniya segodnya i zavtra // Mir Rossii: sotsiologiya, etnologiya. 1993. T. 2. № 1. S. 63-76.
19.
Budaev A.V. Sravnitel'nyi analiz «myagkoi sily» vo vneshnei politike Rossii i Brazilii. // Latinskaya Amerika. 2014. № 4. S. 24-31.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website