Статья 'Современные научные подходы к исследованию негосударственных участников международных отношений' - журнал 'Политика и Общество' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > Requirements for publication > Peer-review process > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal
Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Politics and Society
Reference:

Modern scientific approaches to the study of non-state actors in international relations

Karpovich Oleg Gennad'evich

Doctor of Politics

Deputy Director of the Insitute, Institue of Stategic Research and Forecasting of the People's Friendship University of Russia

101000, Russia, Moscow, Mikluho-Maklaya Street 6

karpovich40@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0684.2017.2.21807

Review date:

26-01-2017


Publish date:

01-03-2017


Abstract.

This article is devoted to the study of modern scientific approaches to the study of the political activity of non-state actors in international relations and world politics (such as TNCs, NGOs and others.). The object of this work is the non-state participants (actors) of international relations and world politics, as well as their political activities. The subject of this work is the modern scientific approaches towards the study of the political activity of non-state actors in international relations and world politics. The purpose of research consists in identification and classification of the modern scientific approaches to the study of non-state actors in international relations and world politics.The methodological basis of the study is a systematic, structural and functional, comparative political approaches, methods of analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, observation.The author notes that by examining the scientific discussions that took place on the role of non-state actors in world politics, there are three main scientific approach, different from each other, basically, understanding the special nature of the relationship, lining up between non-state actors in world politics and nation-states. Each of the selected research approaches leans on specific views upon the role and place of the "actors outside the sovereignty" in the traditional Westphalian world order, in which the nation-states are the only recognized by all actors.

Keywords: diplomacy, international relations, U.S. foreign policy, world politics, global information space, political system, interests, state, security, risks
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Lebedeva M.M. Predmetnoe pole i predmetnye polya mirovoi politiki. [Elektronnyi dokument] / Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. URL: http://www.intertrends.ru/five/008.htm (Data obrashcheniya 04.03.2016)
2.
Tsygankov P.A. Negosudarstvennye uchastniki mirovoi politiki: vzaimodeistvie s gosudarstvami i mezhpravitel'stvennymi organizatsiyami // Mir i Politika. 20113. № 10. S. 257.
3.
Bogaturov A.D. Ponyatie mirovoi politiki v teoreticheskom diskurse // Mezhdunarodnye protsessy. T. 2. № 1(4). Yanvar'-aprel' 2004. S. 16.
4.
Tsygankov P.A. Mirovaya politicheskaya dinamika sovremennogo mira. Teoriya i praktika. M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2014. 576 s. (Biblioteka fakul'teta politologii MGU). S. 49-50.
5.
Strobe Talbott. Globalization and Diplomacy: A Practitioner's Perspective // Foreign Policy, hiver 1997.
6.
Bertrand Badie. De la souveraineité à la capacité de l'État // Marie-Claude Smouts (dir.): Les Nouvelles Relations internationales. Pratiques et théories. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po, 1998, pp. 46 et 50.
7.
Florini Ann M. The Third Force. The Rise of International Society. Wachington Carnegy Endowment for Internationa Peace. 2000.
8.
Schechter Michael G. The Revival of Civil Sosiety: Global and Comparative Perspectives. New York: St. Martin's Press. 1995.
9.
Keohane R.O., Nye J.S. Introduction // Transnational Relations and World Politics / R.O. Keohane, J.S. Nye (eds.). Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1972.
10.
Rosenau J.N. The Study of Global Interdependence: Essays on the Transnationalisation of World Affairs. London: Frances Pinter, 1980
11.
Rosenau J. Pre-Theory Revised: World Politics in an Era of Cascading Interdependence // International Studies Quarterly. 1984. № 1. P. 3-29.
12.
Burton J. World Society. London – New York: Lanham, 1987.
13.
International Studies and the Social Sciences: Problems, Priorities and Prospectsin the United States. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Rosenau, James N. (1974)
14.
Tsygankov P.A. Glava 1. Ponyatie i kriterii mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii // Teoriya mezhdunarodnykh otnoshenii. M.: Gardariki, 2003. S. 34.
15.
Kenneth Waltz. Theory of International Politics. McGraw-Hill. 1979, r. 95.
16.
Non-state actors in world politics / edited by Daphné Josselin and Willliam Wallace. PALGRAVE , NY. 2001. [Elektronnyi dokument] URL: http://www.palgraveconnect.com/pc/doifinder/view/10.1057/9781403900906 (Data obrashcheniya 12.05.2016)
17.
Politics. Basingstoke, Palgrave, 2002, p. 36-37.
18.
M.-C. Smouts, D. Battistella, P. Vennesson. Dictionnaire des relations internationales. Approches. Concepts. Doctrines. – Paris, Dalloz, 2003, p. 379.
19.
Samy Cohen. La Résistance des États. La démocratie face aux défis de la mondialisation. Éd. du Seuil, 2003, p. 53-54.
20.
Gai Piters. Globalizatsiya, upravlenie i ego instituty // Otechestvennye zapiski. № 2(16). 2004. URL: http://www.strana-oz.ru/?numid=17&article=808
21.
Samy Cohen. La Résistance des États. La démocratie face aux défis de la mondialisationé Éd. du Seuil, 2003, p. 18-57.
22.
M.-C. Smouts, D. Battistella, P. Vennesson. Dictionnaire des relations internationales. Approches. Concepts. Doctrines. Paris, Dalloz, 2003, r. 379.
23.
Samy Cohen. La Résistance des États. La démocratie face aux défis de la mondialisationé Éd. du Seuil, 2003, p. 18-57.
24.
Gelbreit Dzh. Ekonomika nevinnogo obmana. M.: Evropa, 2009. S. 51.
25.
Manoilo A.V. Interesy vneshnei politiki SShA v Afganistane // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2012. № 3. S. 76-81.
26.
Manoilo A.V. Iran i SShA: slozhnaya igra s mnogovariantnym rezul'tatom // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2012. № 2. S. 88-95.
27.
Manoilo A.V. Upravlenie konfliktami. Model' psikhologicheskoi operatsii // Akmeologiya. 2009. № 1. S. 64-74.
28.
Manoilo A.V. Natsional'no-gosudarstvennye modeli psikhologicheskogo upravleniya konfliktami // Obozrevatel'-Observer. 2008. № 2. S. 118-123.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website