Статья 'Национальные интересы современных государств и функции транснациональных корпораций в мировой политике ' - журнал 'Тренды и управление' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > Requirements for publication > Peer-review process > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal
Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Trends and management
Reference:

National interests of modern states and functions of the transnational corporations in world politics

Karpovich Oleg Gennad'evich

Doctor of Politics

Deputy Director of the Insitute, Institue of Stategic Research and Forecasting of the People's Friendship University of Russia

101000, Russia, Moscow, Mikluho-Maklaya Street 6

karpovich40@mail.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0730.2017.1.21597

Review date:

01-01-2017


Publish date:

29-04-2017


Abstract.

This article is dedicated to examination of the functions carried out by the modern transnational corporations (TNCs) within the system of world politics system, as well as the national interests of the traditional actors (nation-states), which in global politics are replaced by the transnational and corporate interests. The object of this research is the international (political) activity of the transnational corporations; while the subject is the functions of TNCs in world politics, as well as the conflict of national and corporate interests. The goal of this work consists in determination of the functions of TNCs in global politics and peculiarities of substitution in political sphere of the national interests of states with the corporate interests of TNCs. The attention is given to the fact that in modern world politics, the transnational corporations play a certain functions, which can be compared to or in some ways remind of the political functions of intergovernmental international organizations. From the political perspective, it allows considering TNCs as a direct competitor for not only the traditional nation-states, but also the intergovernmental international organizations. At the same time, the entrance of TNCs into the world politics and “taking on” a number of political functions, creates the risks of substitution of the national interests of modern states with the corporate interests of TNCs.

Keywords: diplomacy, international relations, U. S. foreign policy, world politics, global information space, political system, interests, state, sequrity, risks
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Tsygankov P.A. O soderzhanii termina «mezhdunarodnyi aktor»: vklad sotsiologii // Prostranstvo i vremya v mirovoi politike i mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh. Materialy 4-go Konventa Rossiiskoi assotsiatsii mezhdunarodnykh issledovanii. V 10 t. Tom 1: Aktory v prostranstve i vremeni mirovoi politiki / Pod obshch. red. A.Yu. Mel'vilya; red. toma M.M. Lebedeva. M.: MGIMO-Universitet, 2007. S. 43.
2.
Bashkirov N. Opyt ispol'zovaniya chastnykh voennykh kompanii v khode voennykh konfliktov v Irake i Afganistane // Zarubezhnoe voennoe obozrenie. 2013. № 11. S. 11-21.
3.
Francioni F. The Responsibility of the PMSC’s Home State for Human Rights Violations Arising from the Export of Private Military and Security Services // Academy of European Law, Project “Regulating Privatization of “War”: The Role of the EU in Assuring the Compliance with International Humanitarian Law and Human Rights”. 2009. p. 6.
4.
Private soldiers. Bullets for hire. [Elektronnyi dokument] / The Economist, 2012, 17 noya. URL: http://www.economist.com/news/international/21566625-business-private-armies-not-only-growing-changing-shape-bullets-hire (Data obrashcheniya 12.06.2016)
5.
Serkov S. Stanovlenie sovremennoi otrasli chastnoi bezopasnosti i ego posledstviya dlya mezhdunarodnogo gumanitarnogo prava. [Elektronnyi dokument] / 2013, 1 noya. URL: http://uriadnik.livejournal.com/104288.html (Data obrashcheniya 12.06.2016)
6.
Zorgbibe Ch. Les organisations internationals / Zorgbibe Ch. R., 1991. p. 91-118.
7.
Kuteinikov A.E. Mezhdunarodnye mezhpravitel'stvennye organizatsii: teoretiko-sotsiologicheskii analiz. SPb.: Izd-vo S.-Peterb. un-ta, 2012. 256 s.
8.
"Privatizatsiya" mirovoi politiki / Pod red. M.M. Lebedevoi. M., 2008. S. 43.
9.
Malyar D. Komu vygodno Transatlanticheskoe torgovoe i investitsionnoe partnerstvo? [Elektronnyi dokument] / FB.ru, 2016, 4 maya. URL: http://fb.ru/news/economics/2016/5/4/5314 (Data obrashcheniya 12.07.2016)
10.
Koroleva I.S. Mirovaya ekonomika: global'nye tendentsii za 100 let. M.: Ekonomist, 2007. S. 55.
11.
https://www.stratfor.com/ (Data obrashcheniya 12.07.2016)
12.
Manoilo A.V. Kto stoit za grazhdanskoi voinoi v Yuzhnom Sudane // Mir i politika. 2011. № 5. S. 82–96.
13.
Ne chuzhaya beda. Rinat Akhmetov finansiruet gumanitarnye postavki v otrezannyi ot Ukrainy Donbass. [Elektronnyi dokument] // Rossiiskaya gazeta. 2015, 15 iyun. URL: (Data obrashcheniya 12/07/2016)
14.
Trade In Services, Investment and E-Commerce. Draft. [Elektronnyi dokument] / 2013, 2 iyul. URL: http://keionline.org/sites/default/files/eu-kommission-position-in-den.pdf (Data obrashcheniya 12.06.2016)
15.
Idayatov A.K. Mediakratiya i ee rol' v regulirovanii politicheskikh konflkitov (na primere rossiisko-gruzinskogo konflikta 2008 goda). Avtoref. diss. … kand. polit. nauk. M.: MGU, 2014. S. 43.
16.
Shagabieva E.M. Mezhdunarodnye nepravitel'stvennye organizatsii: ikh vidy, osobennosti, kategorii i kharakteristika // Vlast'. 2010. S. 94-96.
17.
Golikova Yu.A. Transnatsional'nye korporatsii: opredelenie sushchnosti i kharakteristika deyatel'nosti v sovremennykh usloviyakh // Vestnik NGU. Seriya: sotsial'no-ekonomicheskie nauki. 2010. T. 10. Vyp. 4. S. 32-39.
18.
Shagabieva E.M. Mezhdunarodnye nepravitel'stvennye organizatsii: ikh vidy, osobennosti, kategorii i kharakteristika // Vlast'. 2010. S. 94-96.
19.
Nai Dzh. Gibkaya sila. Kak dobit'sya uspekha v mirovoi politike. M.: Trend, 2006. 397 s.
20.
Keohane R.O. And Nye J.S. (Jr) Ed. Transnational Relations and World Politics. Cambridge. MA: Harvard University Press, 1972.
21.
Tsygankov P.A. Mirovaya politicheskaya dinamika sovremennogo mira. Teoriya i praktika. M.: Izdatel'stvo Moskovskogo universiteta, 2014. 576 s. (Biblioteka fakul'teta politologii MGU). S. 52.
22.
Manoilo A.V. Politicheskie konflikty v mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniyakh i mirovoi politike // Mir i Politika. 2013. № 2. S. 71-82.
23.
Filippov V.R. Reformirovanie rossiiskoi gosudarstvennosti: politizatsiya etnichnosti ili deetnizatsiya politiki? // Kazanskii federalist. 2002. № 1. S. 17-35.
24.
Karpovich O.G. Interesy SShA v Ukrainskom krizise 2013–14-kh gg.: osnovnye vygody i preimushchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2016. № 8. C. 1039-1048. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.8.19468.
25.
Denchev S., Pavlova M. Tsvetnye revolyutsii: Kto smeshivaet kraski i kto khudozhnik? // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. 2016. № 1. C. 5-10. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2016.1.18498.
26.
Bocharnikov I.V. Sovremennye tendentsii razvitiya mezhdunarodnogo terrorizma // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. 2016. № 1. C. 52-61. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2016.1.17852.
27.
Manoilo A.V. Modeli «myagkoi sily» setevykh terroristicheskikh organizatsii (na primere zapreshchennykh v Rossiiskoi Federatsii «Islamskogo gosudarstva», Al'-Kaidy, Talibana i «Brat'ev-musul'man») // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. 2016. № 1. C. 11-19. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2016.1.18626.
28.
Ivanov S.M. Separatizm – estestvennyi protsess ili ugroza natsional'noi i mezhdunarodnoi bezopasnosti? // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. 2016. № 1. C. 62-71. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2016.1.17856.
29.
Filippov V.R. Tainaya voina Frantsii v Biafre // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2016. № 3. C. 285-300. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.3.18323.
30.
Manoilo A.V. K voprosu o modelyakh i mekhanizmakh vyrabotki politicheskikh reshenii v Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Trendy i upravlenie. 2016. № 1. C. 45-49. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2016.1.18001.
31.
Karpovich O.G. «Myagkaya sila» brazil'skoi modeli federalizma // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2016. № 2. C. 164-171. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.2.17128.
32.
Gusher A.I. Geopoliticheskie i strategicheskie aspekty operatsii Vozdushno-kosmicheskikh sil Rossii v Sirii // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. 2015. № 4. C. 395-402. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2015.4.16967.
33.
Bocharnikov I.V. Politologicheskie aspekty bor'by s korruptsiei // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. 2015. № 4. C. 374-381. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2015.4.17441.
34.
Karyakin V.V. Politicheskaya mediametriya: kniga o tom, kak chetvertaya vlast' pravit mirom // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. 2016. № 1. C. 86-89. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2016.1.17755.
35.
Karpovich O.G. Separatizm i separatistskie dvizheniya v sovremennom mire (na primere Bel'gii i Velikobritanii): sravnitel'nyi analiz // Pravo i politika. 2016. № 4. C. 449-457. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2016.4.18693.
36.
Gilpin R. Does the multynational corporation have a future?//World order studies program / Occasoinal paper. № 1. P. 33.
37.
Il'in I.V. Globalistika v kontekste politicheskikh protsessov. Diss. dokt. polit. nauk. M.: MGU, 2011. S. 100.
38.
Afontsev S.A. Transnatsional'nye kompanii i problema global'nogo upravleniya. S. 11.
39.
Bocharnikov I.V. Terroristicheskaya gruppirovka «Islamskoe gosudarstvo» kak zakonomernoe sledstvie blizhnevostochnoi strategii SShA // Trendy i upravlenie. 2015. № 4. C. 395-402. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2015.4.17007.
40.
Dobrokhotov L.N. Vzlet i padenie Marko Rubio kak itog pervogo etapa vybornoi kampanii 2016 goda v SShA // Mirovaya politika. 2016. № 2. C. 17-26. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8671.2016.2.18758. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_18758.html
41.
Karpovich O.G. Interesy SShA v Ukrainskom krizise 2013–14-kh gg.: osnovnye vygody i preimushchestva // Politika i Obshchestvo. 2016. № 8. C. 1039-1048. DOI: 10.7256/1812-8696.2016.8.19468.
42.
Ivanov S.M. Separatizm – estestvennyi protsess ili ugroza natsional'noi i mezhdunarodnoi bezopasnosti? // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. 2016. № 1. C. 62-71. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2016.1.17856.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website