Жилищное неравенство в городах как форма социального расслоения: критерии выделения жилищных классов и страт

Старикова Мария Михайловна

doi:10.7256/2310-8673.2018.3.27955


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Urban Studies

Reference:

Starikova M.M. — Housing inequality in cities as a form of social stratification: criteria for distinction of housing classes and strata // Urban Studies. – 2018. – № 3. – P. 71 - 98. DOI: 10.7256/2310-8673.2018.3.27955 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=27955

Housing inequality in cities as a form of social stratification: criteria for distinction of housing classes and strata

Starikova Mariya Mikhailovna

PhD in Sociology

Docent, the department of Culturology, Sociology and Philosophy, Vyatka State University

610000, Russia, Kirovskaya oblast', g. Kirov, ul. Moskovskaya, 36

maria_kuzmina82@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2310-8673.2018.3.27955

Review date:

08-11-2018

Publish date:

15-11-2018

Abstract.

The object of this work is the phenomenon of housing stratification in modern cities. Considering that the majority of Russian cities have a fairly long history, the housing differentiation within and between the city districts becomes evident. The article substantiated the stratifying function of housing space, which is yet insufficiently studied in the sociological field. The author examines the methodology of sociological research of inequality in housing sphere in the works of Russian and foreign sociologists. The criteria and empirical indicators for assessing housing stratification are analyzed. The article also provides the results of empirical research of the parameters of housing inequality through the method of structured semi-formalized observation in the three cities of Kirov Oblast: regional center Kirov, and two administrative centers – Kirovo-Chepetsk and Vyatskiye Polyany. A number of objective and subjective estimates of the quality of housing accessible to observation is determined. The conducted comparative analysis allows revealing the strong and weak sides of the housing complexes of various cities. It is demonstrated that at the microlevel of the building, occasionally one can observe the polarization between building entrances depending on the civic engagement and responsibility of the residents. At the mesolevel, within the residential neighborhood, housing stratification depends mostly on the year built, because the parameters of quality and state of the building directly correlate with its age, despite the capital repair.

Keywords: urban environment, housing class, stratification criteria, housing status, housing stratification, housing stock, housing quality, housing disparity, housing, sociological observation
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Veber M. Osnovnye ponyatiya stratifikatsii // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 1994. № 5. S. 147–156.
2.	Giddens A. Capitalism and Modern Social Theory. An Analysis of the writings of Marx, Durkheim and Max Weber. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1971. 261 p.
3.	Sorokin, P. A. Sotsial'naya mobil'nost' / per. s angl. M. V. Sokolovoi; pod obshch. red. V. V. Sapova. M.: Academia: LVS, 2005. 608 s.
4.	Burd'e P. Sotsiologiya sotsial'nogo prostranstva: per. s fr. SPb.: Aleteiya, 2007. 288 s.
5.	Bourdieu P. Espace social et genèse des «classes» // Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales. 1984. № 52-53. P. 3–14.
6.	Polukhina E. V. Zhilishchnaya mobil'nost': napravleniya sotsiologicheskogo analiza // Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki, 2017. Tom 15. № 4. S. 589–602.
7.	Chikagskaya sotsiologiya: sbornik perevodov / RAN. INION; otv. red. D. V. Efremenko. M., 2015. 430 s.
8.	Musil J. How the sociology of housing emerged // Sociologicky Casopis. 2005. Vol. 2. № 41. R. 207–225.
9.	Kemeny J., Lowe S. Schools of Comparative Housing Research: From Convergence to Divergence // Housing Studies. 1998. Vol. 2. № 13 R. 161–176.
10.	De Haan J., Van Der Wal E., De Vries P. The measurement of house prices: A review of the sale price appraisal ratio method // Journal of Economic and Social Measurement. 2009. Vol. 2-3. № 34. R. 51–86.
11.	Dewilde C. What have ECHP and EU-SILC to contribute to the comparative study of housing? // Critical Housing Analysis. 2015. Vol. 2. № 2. R. 19–26.
12.	Horsewood N. Demystifying Quantitative Methods in Comparative Housing Research: Dispelling the Myth of Black Magic // International Journal of Housing Policy. 2011. Vol. 4. № 11. R. 375–393.
13.	Sharkey P., Faber J. W. Where, when, why, and for whom do residential contexts matter? Moving away from the dichotomous understanding of neighborhood effects // Annual Review of Sociology. 2013. № 40. R. 559–579.
14.	Douglass M. The «new» Tokyo story: Restructuring space and the struggle for place in a world city (Book Chapter) / Japanese Cities. 2009. R. 83–119.
15.	Gyimah S.O., Walters D., Phythian K.L. Ethnicity, immigration and housing wealth in Toronto // Canadian Journal of Urban Research. 2005. № 14(2), s. 338–363.
16.	Flippen C. A. The spatial dynamics of stratification: Metropolitan context, population redistribution, and black and Hispanic homeownership // Demography. 2010. Vol. 4. № 47. R. 845–868.
17.	Klaufus C. Dwelling as representation: Values of architecture in an Ecuadorian squatter settlement // Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 2001, № 15(4). R. 341–365.
18.	Fikfak A. Re-urbanisation of the apartment building-From the view of changes in the living culture // Geodetski Vestnik. 2007. № 51(2). R. 341–352.
19.	Kim J. H. Amenity valuing differentiation in residential location choice among income groups: A stated preference approach // International Journal of Urban Sciences. 2006. № 10(1). R. 41-57.
20.	Hauge A. L., Kolstad A. Dwelling as an expression of identity: A comparative study among residents in high-priced and low-priced neighbourhoods in Norway // Housing, Theory and Society. 2007. № 24. R. 272–292.
21.	Palmer G. L. Examining the Effects of Scattered Site Supportive Housing on the Social and Economic Integration of Men Who Are Formerly Homeless and Primarily Black/African American // Journal of Black Studies. 2016. № 47(8). R. 846–868.
22.	Zavisca J. R., Gerber T. P. The Socioeconomic, Demographic, and Political Effects of Housing in Comparative Perspective // Annual Review of Sociology. 2016. № 42, P. 347–367.
23.	McConnell E. D. Hurdles or walls? Nativity, citizenship, legal status and Latino homeownership in Los Angeles // Social Science Research. 2015. № 53. P. 19–33.
24.	McConnell E. D., Marcelli E. A. Buying into the American dream? Mexican immigrants, legal status, and homeownership in Los Angeles County // Social Science Quarterly. 2007. № 88(1). R. 199–221.
25.	Burt M. R. Homelessness in the United States (Book Chapter) / International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition, 2015. P. 159–162.
26.	Solari C. D., Mare R. D. Housing crowding effects on children's wellbeing // Social Science Research. 2012. № 41(2). R. 464–476.
27.	Nichols N., Braimoh J. Community Safety, Housing Precariousness and Processes of Exclusion: An Institutional Ethnography from the Standpoints of Youth in an «Unsafe» Urban Neighbourhood // Critical Sociology. 2018. № 44(1). R. 157–172.
28.	Goldsmith P. R. Learning apart, living apart: How the racial and ethnic segregation of schools and colleges perpetuates residential segregation // Teachers College Record. 2010. № 112(6). R. 1602–1630.
29.	Dwyer R. E. Expanding homes and increasing inequalities: U.S. housing development and the residential segregation of the affluent // Social Problems. 2007. № 54(1). R. 23–46.
30.	Brown L. A., Chung S.-Y. Spatial segregation, segregation indices and the geographical perspective // Population, Space and Place, 2007. № 12(2). R. 125–143.
31.	Flippen C. A. Residential segregation and minority home ownership // Social Science Research. 2001. № 30(3). R. 337–362.
32.	Toft M. Enduring contexts: Segregation by affluence throughout the life course // Sociological Review. 2017. № 66. R. 645–664.
33.	Ljunggren J., Andersen P. L. Vertical and horizontal segregation: Spatial class divisions in Oslo 1970–2003 // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2015. № 39. R. 305–322.
34.	Muñoz S. A look inside the struggle for housing in Buenos Aires, Argentina // Urban Geography. 2017. № 38(8). R. 1252–1269.
35.	Thal A. Class Isolation and Affluent Americans’ Perception of Social Conditions // Political Behavior. 2017. № 39 (2). R. 401–424.
36.	Flippen C. A. Racial and ethnic inequality in homeownership and housing equity // Sociological Quarterly. 2001. № 42(2). R. 121–149.
37.	Roscigno V. J., Karafin D. L., Tester G. The complexities and processes of racial housing discrimination // Social Problems. 2009. № 56(1). R. 49–69.
38.	Sharkey P. Stuck in place: Urban neighborhoods and the end of progress toward racial equality. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press, 2013. 250 p.
39.	Niriella N. C. Emerging social-spatial polarisation within the housing market in Colombo, Sri Lanka // Journal of Urban Regeneration and Renewal. 2017. № 11(2). R. 158–167.
40.	Kell C. «Making things happen»: Literacy and agency in housing struggles in South Africa // Journal of Development Studies, 2008. № 44(6). R. 892–912.
41.	Porter L. Transnational spaces: U.S. expatriates recreating home in Costa Rica // International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences. 2009. № 3(10). R. 217–223.
42.	García F. A., Peralta M. D. P. Multifamily gated communities and their urban environment: A new symbolic geography in the city of Cali (Colombia) // Eure. 2016. № 42(126). R. 77–76.
43.	Çavdar A. Building, Marketing and Living in an Islamic Gated Community: Novel Configurations of Class and Religion in Istanbul // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 2016. № 40 (3). R. 507–523.
44.	Borsdorf A., Hildalgo R.,Vidal-Koppmann S. Social segregation and gated communities in Santiago de Chile and Buenos Aires. A comparison // Habitat International. 2016. № 54. R. 18–27.
45.	Rex J., Moore R. Race. Community, and Conflict. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1967.
46.	Kolb K., Skopek N., Blossfeld H. P. The two dimensions of housing inequality in Europe are high home ownership rates an indicator of low housing values? // Comparative Population Studies. 2013. № 38(4), R. 1009–1041.
47.	Hess D. B., Tammaru T., Leetmaa K. Ethnic differences in housing in post-Soviet Tartu, Estonia // Cities. 2012. № 29(5). R. 327–333.
48.	Dwyer R. E. The McMansionization of America? Income stratification and the standard of living in housing, 1960-2000 // Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 2009. № 27(4), R. 285–300.
49.	Massey D. S. Categorically unequal: The American stratification system (Book), 2007. 319 r.; Krivo L.J., Kaufman R.L. Housing and wealth inequality: Racial-ethnic differences in home equity in the United States // Demography. 2004. № 41(3). R. 585–605.
50.	Conley D. A room with a view or a room of one's own? Housing and social stratification // Sociological Forum. 2001. № 16(2). R. 263–280.
51.	Ho D. W. L. The dilemma between class status and property // International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social and Community Studies. 2017. № 12(2). R. 25–33.
52.	Zhu Y., Fu Q., Ren Q. Cross-city variations in housing outcomes in postreform China: An analysis of 2005 microcensus data // Chinese Sociological Review. 2014. № 46(3). R. 26–54.
53.	Zhao W., Ge J. Dual institutional structure and housing inequality in transitional urban China // Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 2014. № 37, R. 23–41.
54.	Zuyun L., Xiaoping M. Housing stratification in urban China: A study based on a guangzhou household questionnaire survey // Social Sciences in China. 2012. № 33(4). R. 5–27.
55.	Hu X., Kaplan D.H. The emergence of affluence in beijing: Residential social stratification in china's capital city // Urban Geography. 2001. № 22(1). R. 54–77.
56.	Logan J. R., Bian Y., Bian F. Housing inequality in Urban China in the 1990s // International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 1999. № 23(1). R. 7–25.
57.	Chen J., Wu Y., Guo F., Wang H. Domestic property and housing class in contemporary urban China // Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. 2018. № 33(1). R. 91–109.
58.	Huang Y., Li S.-M. Housing inequality, residential differentiation, and social stratification: Chinese cities in the early twenty-first century (Book Chapter) / Housing Inequality in Chinese Cities. 2014. P. 3–17.
59.	Wu X., Zheng B. Household registration, urban status attainment, and social stratification in China // Research in Social Stratification and Mobility. 2018. № 53. R. 40–49.
60.	Zavisca J. R. Housing the New Russia. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press. 2012. 264 r.
61.	Meerovich M. G. Zhilishchnaya politika SSSR kak sredstvo sotsial'nogo upravleniya (1917–1941 gg.) // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2014. № 1. S. 95–101.
62.	Shkaratan O. I. Sotsial'no-ekonomicheskoe neravenstvo v sovremennom mire i stanovlenie novykh form sotsial'nogo rassloeniya v Rossii // Mir Rossii. 2018. № 2. S. 6–35.
63.	Sotsial'naya stratifikatsiya sovremennogo rossiiskogo obshchestva: Analiticheskoe obozrenie / Otv. red. Belyaeva L.A. M.: Tsentr kompleksnykh sotsial'nykh issledovanii i marketinga, 1995. 90 s.
64.	Zaslavskaya T. I. Sotsial'naya stratifikatsiya i differentsiatsiya dokhodov v Rossii // Vzaimosvyaz' sotsial'noi raboty i sotsial'noi politiki. M., 1997.
65.	Il'in V. I. Sotsial'naya stratifikatsiya. Syktyvkar. 1991. 221 s.
66.	Tikhonova N. E. Faktory sotsial'noi stratifikatsii v usloviyakh perekhoda k rynochnoi ekonomike: avtoref. dis. … d-ra sotsiol. nauk. M., 2000. 44 s.
67.	Radaev V. V. Vlastnaya stratifikatsiya v sisteme sovetskogo tipa // Rubezh. 1991. № 1. S. 130–132.
68.	Radaev V. V., Shkaratan O. I. Sotsial'naya stratifikatsiya. Uchebnik dlya vuzov. M.: Aspekt Press, 1996. 318 s.
69.	Krotov P. P, Buravoi M., Lytkina T.S. Zhilishchnaya stratifikatsiya goroda: rynochnaya evolyutsiya sovetskoi modeli. Syktyvkar. Komi nauchnyi tsentr UrO RAN, 2003. 120 s.
70.	Kornev N. R. Zhilishchnaya stratifikatsiya v tsentre Sankt-Peterburga // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2005. № 6. S. 77–85.
71.	Cherkashina T. Yu. Zhilishchnaya differentsiatsiya v postsovetskoi Rossii: institutsional'nyi i ekonomicheskii kontekst dinamiki zhilishchnykh grupp // EKO. 2018. Tom 48. № 3. S. 60–81.
72.	Shomina E. S. Kvartiros''emshchiki — nashe «Zhilishchnoe men'shinstvo»: Rossiiskii i zarubezhnyi opyt razvitiya arendnogo zhil'ya. M.: izd. dom gos. Un-ta — vysshei shkoly ekonomiki, 2010. 364 s.
73.	N. Kosareva, A. Tumanov. Ob otsenke dostupnosti zhil'ya v Rossii voprosy ekonomiki // Voprosy ekonomiki. 2007. № 7. S. 118–135.
74.	Ptichnikova G. A. «Nespravedlivyi gorod»: gorodskoe prostranstvo kak otrazhenie obshchestvennykh otnoshenii // Sotsiologiya goroda. 2012. № 3. S. 47–55.
75.	Problemnye aspekty razvitiya maloetazhnogo zhilishchnogo stroitel'stva Rossii: Monografiya / Pod obshchei red. V. S. Kazeikina i S. A. Baronina. M.: INFRA-M, 2011. 278 s.
76.	Bessonova O. E., Krapchan S. G. Uchastie naseleniya v privatizatsii zhil'ya // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 1994. № 8–9. S. 27–40.
77.	Grishanov V. I. Neravenstvo v dokhodakh i neravenstvo v kachestve zhil'ya / Zhilishchnyi vopros kak problema sotsial'noi politiki: sbornik / In-t mezhdunar. ekon. i polit. issled. RAN; red. T. V. Chubarova. Moskva.: IMEPI RAN, 2004. S. 78–92.
78.	Edinaya klassifikatsiya proektov mnogokvartirnykh zhilykh novostroek po kachestvu (EKMZhN). M.: Rossiiskaya Gil'diya rieltorov, 2012.
79.	Nurusheva A. M. Osobennosti sotsial'no-prostranstvennogo neravenstva v gorodskom landshafte Astany // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2013. № 4. S. 89–94.
80.	Sidorova O. S., Mosienko N. L. Rol' sotsial'no-prostranstvennoi segregatsii v formirovanii gorodskikh soobshchestv (na primere rynka zhiloi nedvizhimosti Novosibirska) // Sotsial'nye i prostranstvennye izmereniya sovremennogo megapolisa: materialy IX sotsiologicheskikh chtenii pamyati Valeriya Borisovicha Golofasta (1941–2004), 3–5 aprelya 2017 g. SPb.: Norma. 2017. S. 52–64.
81.	Burdyak A. Ya. Obespechennost' zhil'em v postsovetskoi Rossii: neravenstvo i problema pokolenii // Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki. 2015. Tom 13. N 2. S. 273–288.
82.	Iudin A. A., Shpilev D. A. Osnovnye problemy sovremennykh nemetskikh gorodov s tochki zreniya nemetskoi sotsiologii. Problemy razvitiya goroda // Vestnik Nizhegorodskogo universiteta im. N. I. Lobachevskogo (NNGU). Seriya «Sotsial'nye nauki». 2009. № 4 (16). S. 69–77.
83.	Häußermann H. Armut in der Großstadt. Die Stadtstruktur verstärkt soziale Ungleichheit // Informationen zur Raumentwicklung. 2003. H. 3/4. S. 147–159.
84.	Samoilova N. A., Strizhakova O. N. «Bogatstvo» i «bednost'»: kontrasty polyarnykh prostranstv goroda (na primere Samary i Nizhnekamska) // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii. 2005. T. VIII. № 4. S. 58–68.
85.	Puzanov A. S., Kosareva N. B., Polidi T. D., Tumanov A. A. Analiz izmenenii zhilishchnoi obespechennosti i vozmozhnostei uluchsheniya zhilishchnykh uslovii v period perekhoda k rynochnoi ekonomike // Uroven' zhizni naseleniya regionov Rossii. 2012. № 1. S. 29–41.
86.	Belkina T. D. Zhil'e v Rossii: situatsiya i perspektivy // Problemy prognozirovaniya. 2013. №3. S. 101–116.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.