Постижение феномена жестокости в классический и постклассический периоды развития психологии

Епанчинцева Галина Александровна; Барковская Анастасия Павловна

doi:10.7256/2454-0722.2015.9.15306


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Psychology and Psychotechnics

Reference:

Epanchintseva G.A., Barkovskaya A.P. Comprehension of the Phenomenon of Cruelty During Classical and Post-Classical Periods of Development of Psychology // Psychology and Psychotechnics. 2015. № 9. P. 934-941. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0722.2015.9.15306 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=15306

Постижение феномена жестокости в классический и постклассический периоды развития психологии

Epanchintseva Galina Aleksandrovna

Doctor of Psychology

professor of the Department of General Psychology and Personality Psychology at Orenburg State University

460000, Russia, Orenburg Region, Orenburg, pr. Pobedy, 13

galinamar@mail.ru

Barkovskaya Anastasiya Pavlovna

post-graduate student of the Department of General Psychology and Personality Psychology at Orenburg State University, assistant of the Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy at Orenburg State Medical University

460000, Russia, Orenburg Region, Orenburg, str. Novaya, 23

ubgjabp@mail.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "The range of emotional experience"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0722.2015.9.15306

Received:

17-05-2015

Published:

1-4.32-2015

Abstract: The authors of the present research has conducted the comparative theoretical analysis of cruelty. It is revealed that views on the nature and origin of violence has been changing significantly throughout times. The authors describe differences in views on cruelty during the classical and post-classical periods of the development of psychology . The authors have also identified some specific factors that contribute to the formation and manifestation of violence. By analyzing the results of various researches, the authors show the distinctive features of cruelty from similar phenomena such as rage, aggression and hatred. The authors also consider the influence of genetic features and acquired social factors on the formation and manifestation of cruelty. It is revealed that cruelty is not only a permanent or situational quality, a variety of reasons and factors of different nature and content influences it. The main methods of the research of the phenomenon of violence in this article were: theoretical analysis, psychological and comparative analysis and classification of the conceptual framework. The scientific novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the authors have reviewed and reconceived a number of concepts of cruelty. The authors have also described and analyzed internal and external factors that lead to cruelty. Based on the theoretical analysis of cruelty the authors emphasize the need to clarify the meaning and significance of this concept for a more thorough identification of numerous terminological differences in the use of the term "cruelty".

Keywords:

psychology, personality, cruelty, aggression, hatred, rage, ruthlessness, gloating, violence, sadism

References

1. Kol'tsov M. V. Zhestokost' kak strukturnyi komponent agressivnosti // Aspirant, ili Molodoe pokolenie uchenykh o…: nauchno-prakticheskii al'manakh aspirantskogo soobshchestva. – 6. – Orenburg: Izd-vo OGPU, 2012. – S.115-122.
2. Antonyan Yu.M. Ubiistva radi ubiistva / Yu.M. Antonyan. M.: Izd-vo «Shchit-M»,1998. – 233s.
3. Antonyan Yu.M. Zhestokost' v nashei zhizni – M.: INFRA-M, 1995 . – 320 c.
4. Beron R., Richardson D. Agressiya. – SPb.: Piter, 1997. – 336 s.
5. Freid 3. Po tu storonu printsipa udovol'stviya // Psikhologiya bessoznatel'nogo. Sbornik proizvedenii. – M.: Prosveshchenie, 1990. – 38 – 424 s.
6. Fromm E. Anatomiya chelovecheskoi destruktivnosti. – M.: AST, 2010. – 224 s.
7. Khekkhauzen Kh. Agressiya // Motivatsiya i deyatel'nost': v 2 t. M.: Pedagogika, 1986. – T. 1. – S. 365 – 405.
8. Khorni K. Nashi vnutrennie konflikty. Konstruktivnaya teoriya nevroza – SPb.: Lan', 1997. – 240 s.
9. Lorents K. Tak nazyvaemoe zlo. K estestvennoi istorii agressii // Oborotnaya storona zerkala. – M.: Respublika, 1998. – 363 s.
10. Walter G., Nau J., Oud N. Aggression und Aggressionsmanagement. – Bern: Verlag Hans Huber, 2012. – 619 r.
11. Epanchintseva G.A. O novykh tendentsiyakh razvitiya psikhodiagnostiki // Izvestiya Samarskogo nauchnogo tsentra Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. – 2002. – № 4.Chast' 7. – S. 199.
12. Bandura A. (1973). Institutionally sanctioned violence // Journal of Clinical Child Psychology 2 23-24p.
13. Barkovskaya A.P., Epanchintseva G.A. K probleme podrostkovoi zhestokosti // Universitetskii kompleks kak regional'nyi tsentr obrazovaniya, nauki i kul'tury: materialy Vserossiiskoi nauchno-metodicheskoi konferentsii (c mezhdunarodnym uchastiem). – Orenburg, 2015. – S. 2023-2025s.
14. Leont'ev A.N. Deyatel'nost'. Soznanie. Lichnost' – M.: Politizdat, 1975. – S. 104-105s.
15. Guggenbyul' Allan. Zloveshchee ocharovanie nasiliya: profilaktika detskoi agressivnosti i zhestokosti / Guggenbyul', Allan ; A. Guggenbyul' ; per. s nem. N. Skoroduma. – 2-e izd. – : Kogito-Tsentr, 2006. – 176 s.
16. Chernova G.R. Zhestokost' kak fenomen kul'tury: Monografiya. SPb.: LGU im. A.S. Pushkina, 2005. – 96 s.
17. Epanchintseva G.A. Antropologicheskii podkhod i psikhodiagnosticheskie pozitsii v psikhologii // Sibirskii pedagogicheskii zhurnal. – 2009. – №12. – S. 288-295
18. Kh'ell L., Zigler D. Teorii lichnosti (osnovnye polozheniya, issledovaniya i primenenie). SPb.: Piter Press, 1997. – 608 s.
19. Barkovskaya A.P. K probleme filosofskogo ponimaniya zhestokosti//Fundamental'nye issledovaniya. – 2015. – № 2.Chast' 7. – S. 1513-1517.
20. Balabanova L.M. Sudebnaya patopsikhologiya: Voprosy opredeleniya normy i otklonenii / L.M. Balabanova. – D.: Stalker, 1998. – 432s.
21. Berkowitz L. (1964). Aggressive cues in aggressive behavior and hostility catharsis // Psychological Review 71 104-122p.
22. Gannushkin P.B. Sladostrastie, zhestokost' i religiya // Izb. tr. M., 1964. – 292 s.
23. Bandura A. Teoriya sotsial'nogo naucheniya. – SPb.: Evraziya, 2000.– 320s.
24. Ratinov A. R. Sudebnaya psikhologiya dlya sledovatelei. M.: Yurlitinform, 2001. – 352 s.
25. Abdullaev Sh.M., Abdullaeva D.S. Zhestokost' kak psikhosotsial'nyi fenomen // Psikhologiya XXI veka: Sbornik material V mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii molodykh uchenykh: v 2 t. – SPb.: Leningradskii gosudarstvennyi universitet im. A.S. Pushkina. – 2009. – T. 1. – S. 14-19.
26. Dal' V.I. Tolkovyi slovar' zhivogo velikorusskogo yazyka: V 4 t. M.: Izdatel'skii tsentr «TERRA», 1994, t.3. – 560 s.
27. Tolkovyi slovar' russkogo yazyka: V 4 t. / Pod red. D. N. Ushakova. – M.: Gos. in-t «Sov. entsikl.»; OGIZ; Gos. izd-vo inostr. i nats. slov, 1935-1940. – 347s.
28. Davletchina S.B. Slovar' po konfliktologii. Ulan-Ude: VSGTU. – 2005. – 100 s.
29. Zhmurov, V. A. Bol'shaya entsiklopediya po psikhiatrii / V. A. Zhmurov. – 2-e izd. – M.: Dzhangar, 2012. – 864 s.
30. Tkhostov A.Sh., Surnov K.G. Vliyanie sovremennykh tekhnologii na razvitie lichnosti i formirovanie patologicheskikh form adaptatsii: obratnaya storona sotsializatsii // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. – 2005. T. 26. № 6. – S. 53-58.
31. Rumyantseva T. G. Ponyatie agressivnosti v sovremennoi zarubezhnoi psikhologii // Voprosy psikhologii. – 1991. – № 1. – S. 81-87.
32. Samokhina A. A. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskaya deformatsiya kak prichina delinkventnogo povedeniya // Prikladnaya psikhologiya. – 2000. – № 3. – S. 46-55.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.