Ñòàòüÿ 'Îäèí ÿçûê èëè ìíîãîÿçû÷üå?' - æóðíàë 'Ïñèõîëîãèÿ è Ïñèõîòåõíèêà' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Îäèí ÿçûê èëè ìíîãîÿçû÷üå?

Gurevich Pavel Semenovich

head of the division at Institute of Philosophy of the Russian Academy of Sciences

109240, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Goncharnaya, 12, str. 1, of. -

gurevich@rambler.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0722.2015.4.15026

Received:

15-04-2015


Published:

26-05-2015


Abstract: The research subjet is the psychological and cultural grounds for creation of a unified planetary language. Is there a need in a unified planetary language? In what way can it be created? What if it is better to listen to all 'voices' and languages of the modern world rather than to create a new esperanto or a language that would be more flexible and popular with masses? Who defines the status of a universal language? What plays the more important role in the process of creating such a language, theoretical findings of language experts or the political will of modern leaders? What will happen to the heritage of small ethnic groups and social communities on the periphery of the global process? What if the humankind loses cultural treasures when different cultural orientations will become one? As we see, this topic raises a lot of questions that need to be solved as soon as possible. In his research Gurevich has used the methods of psycholinguistics as well as findings of philosophy of culture and philosophy of language. He has also used the methods of comparative research. It is demonstrated that the fate of languages in the epoch of globalization brings out all kinds of philosophical, socio-cultural and linguistic isues. This topic is not only nettlesome but also very important in the conceptual meaning. The spiritual debates of civilizations oblidge humanities to state a whole number of problems as a result of globalization. In his article Gurevich also discusses what language could undertake the role of the universal language. He also discusses whether it would be useful to create a universal communication code. 


Keywords:

psychology, philosophy, language, culture, communication, interaction, globalization, symbol, Völkerpsychologie (psychology of peoples), information

References
1. Benedikt Rut. Khrizantema i mech: Modeli yaponskoi kul'tury. M.; SPb.: Tsentr gumanitarnykh initsiativ, 2013. 256 s.
2. Spirova E.M. Universal'nyi yazyk globalistiki // Vek globalizatsii. Issledovaniya sovremennykh global'nykh protsessov. 2012. ¹ 1(9). S. 34-45.
3. Bzhezinskii Zbignev. Vybor: mirovoe gospodstvo ili global'noe liderstvo. M., 2006.
4. Voevodina Tat'yana. Pionery i pensionery. S kem nam segodnya po puti, esli my khotim dvigat'sya vpered? // Literaturnaya gazeta. 2014. ¹ 48. S. 9.
5. Uroki ukrainskogo. Kak Rossii zastavit' schitat'sya s soboi vo vsem mire. (Interv'yu s S.A. Karaganovym) // Argumenty i fakty. 2014. ¹ 50. S. 10.
6. Al'-Dzhanabi M.M. Filosofiya musul'manskogo kul'turnogo dukha // «Rassypannoe» i «sobrannoe»: strategii smyslovogo prostranstva v arabo-musul'manskoi kul'ture / / Otv. red. A.V. Smirnov. M.: OOO «Sadra»; Yazyki slavyanskoi kul'tury, 2015. 400 s.
7. Gumbol'dt V. Opyt analiza meksikanskogo yazyka // Gumbol'dt Vil'gel'm fon. Yazyk i filosofiya kul'tury. M.: Progress, 1985. 451 s.
8. Alpatov V.M. Amerikanizatsiya yaponskogo i russkogo obshchestva po yazykovym dannym // Rossiiskoe vostokovedenie v pamyat' o M.S. Kapitse. Ocherki, issledovaniya, razrabotki / Otv. red. i sost. A.M. Petrov. M.: Muravei, 2001. 703 s.
9. Gurevich P.S. Yazyk kak sokrovishche ideologii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2015. ¹ 1(85). S. 7-11.
10. Adorno T. Zhargon podlinnosti. O nemetskoi ideologii. M.: «Kanon+» ROOI «Reabilitatsiya», 2014. 191 s.
11. Gurevich P.S. Perevoploshchenie teksta v ideologiyu // Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2013. ¹ 4(64). S. 423-428.
12. Gurevich P.S., Bueva L.P., Egorova I.V. «Nuzhna li nam ideologiya?» v rubrike «Kruglyi stol» // Vestnik analitiki. 2014. ¹ 1(55). S. 99-120.
13. Spirova E.M. «Protez dukhovnosti». O knige T. Adorno «O nemetskoi ideologii» // Vestnik analitiki. 2014. ¹ 2(56). S. 152-155
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.