Статья 'Классификация условий профессионального развития педагогов в системе инновационного образования' - журнал 'Психология и Психотехника' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychology and Psychotechnics
Reference:

Классификация условий профессионального развития педагогов в системе инновационного образования

Lenkov Sergey Leonidovich

Doctor of Psychology

professor at Moscow Humanitarian and Economic Institute, principal research scientist at Institute of Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Childhood under the Russian Academy of Education

119121, Russia, Moscow, str. Pogodinskaya, 8, room No. 703

es2013.rao@mail.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0722.2015.3.14649

Received:

06-03-2015


Published:

24-04-2015


Abstract: The classification of qualitatively heterogeneous conditions for professional development of educators in the system of innovative education. Classification of the search conditions is as follows. I. External conditions: (a) substantive (material and information); b) social (socio-psychological, socio-economic, legal, organizational and scientific-methodical). II. Internal conditions: a) individual psychological (personal and professional individual psychological); b) nasaesa. The main attention is paid to the analysis highlighted within this classification of psychological conditions, including conditions of socio-psychological, personal and professional individual psychological. The study is based on the following theoretical and methodological basis: subject-activity approach (S. L. Rubinstein and others) and its specification in the psychology of labor (C. D. Shadrikov and others) and educational psychology (in. A. Davydov and others), the provisions of psychological anthropology (C. I. Slobodchikov), metasystemic approach to the study of layered structures of the psyche (Century A. Karpov), integrative-typological approach to the psychological classification of professional activities (N. E. Rubtsov), the concept of professional development (Y. P. Poweredcom) and professionalism (E. A. Klimov). This study draws heavily on a number of original projects: cross-cultural analysis of psychological and pedagogical models of professional development, the model of psycho-pedagogical support of professional self-determination (together with N. E. Scar), a methodological analysis of the concepts of "professionalism" and "professional marginalism" for innovative teachers. Presents a scientific approach to the study of some relatively little-studied aspects of professional development of teachers in the new historical, socio-cultural, scientific-technical conditions developed mainly from the positions of psychology of labour and educational psychology. For the first time and systematized conditions for professional development of educators in the system of innovative education.Identified conditions are necessary, because their absence greatly hinders the professional development of teachers for innovative education. However, the question of their universal sufficiency requires further research and experimental work in teams of innovative educational institutions.Classification of conditions for professional development of innovative teachers, in full accordance with the ideology of the anthropological model of innovative education, adopted in the framework of the study is not definitive, but, on the contrary, necessarily implies further clarification, addition and development of the accumulation of new scientific findings and results of innovative educational practices.


Keywords:

professional marginalism, personality, psychological conditions, conditions, professional development, innovative education, educator, professionalism, education, professional activity

References
1. MacBeath J. Future of Teaching Profession. – Cambridge, UK: Education International Research Institute, University of Cambridge, 2012. – 112 p.
2. Gurevich P.S. Samoformirovanie (Bildung) kak problema obrazovaniya // Pedagogika i prosveshchenie.-2014.-2.-C. 4-7. DOI: 10.7256/2306-434X.2014.2.13012.
3. Len'kov S. L. Problemy kross-kul'turnogo analiza psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh modelei professional'nogo stanovleniya // Novoe v psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyakh. 2013. № 3. – S. 249-272.
4. Povarenkov Yu. P. Problemy psikhologii professional'nogo stanovleniya lichnosti. – Saratov: Saratovskii gosudarstvennyi sotsial'no-ekonomicheskii universitet, 2013. – 322 s.
5. Entsiklopedicheskii slovar' po psikhologii i pedagogike. 2013. [Elektronnyi resurs] // Sait «Akademik» / URL: http://psychology_pedagogy.academic.ru/19183/ (Data dostupa 24.02.2015).
6. Slobodchikov V. I. Innovatsii v obrazovanii: osnovaniya i smysl [Elektronnyi resurs] // Portal «Issledovatel'.ru» / URL: http://www.researcher.ru/methodics/nauka/ (Data dostupa 22.02.2015).
7. Len'kov S. L. Professionalizm i professional'nyi marginalizm pedagogov innovatsionnogo obrazovaniya // Novoe v psikhologo-pedagogicheskikh issledovaniyakh. 2014. № 1. – S. 152-175.
8. Len'kov S. L. Model' psikhologo-pedagogicheskogo soprovozhdeniya professional'nogo samoopredeleniya: integrativno-tipologicheskii podkhod / S. L. Len'kov, N. E. Rubtsova // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya «Pedagogika i psikhologiya». 2014. № 4. – S. 7-24.
9. Klimov, E. A. Psikhologiya professional'nogo samoopredeleniya. – M.: Izdatel'skii tsentr «Akademiya», 2004. – 304 s.
10. Kukuev E.A. Rigidnost' sub''ektov obrazovaniya // Psikholog.-2014.-4.-C. 96-125. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8701.2014.4.12796. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/psp/article_12796.html
11. Karpov A. V. Metasistemnaya organizatsiya urovnevykh struktur psikhiki. – M.: Izd-vo «Institut psikhologii RAN», 2004. – 504 s.
12. Rubtsova N. E. Psikhologicheskaya klassifikatsiya sovremennoi profes-sional'noi deyatel'nosti. V 2-kh kn. – Tver': Izd-vo TF MGEI, 2012.
13. Cloninger C. R. A Psychobiological Model of Temperament and Character // Archives of General Psychiatry. 1993. V. 50 (12). – P. 975-990.
14. De Fruyt F. Cloninger's Psychobiological Model of Temperament and Character and the Five-Factor Model of Personality / F. De Fruyt, L. Van De Wiele, C. Van Herringen // Personality and Individual Differences. 2000. V. 29 (3). – P. 441-452.
15. Zuckerman M. Sensation seeking // Handbook of Individual Differences in Social behavior / M. R. Leary, R. H. Hoyle (Eds.). – New York; London: The Guildford Press, 2009. – P. 455-465.
16. Costa P. T., Jr. The Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Fve-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) Professional Manual / P. T. Costa, Jr., R. R. McCrae. – Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Re-sources, 1992. – 101 p.
17. Klochko V. E. Psikhologiya innovatsionnogo povedeniya / V. E. Klochko, E. V. Galazhinskii. – Tomsk: Tomskii gosudarstvennyi universitet, 2009. – 240 s.
18. Mikhailova E.E. Osobennosti kommunikativnykh kompetentsii v informatsionnom obshchestve // Vestnik Tverskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Seriya: Filosofiya. 2011. № 3-4. S. 4-14.
19. Zavalishina D.N. Printsip sub''ekta v issledovaniyakh professional'noi deyatel'nosti // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2012.-4.-C. 61-71.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.