по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Legal information
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

В погоне за двумя зайцами поймай обоих сразу!
34 журнала издательства NOTA BENE входят одновременно и в ERIH PLUS, и в перечень изданий ВАК
При необходимости автору может быть предоставлена услуга срочной или сверхсрочной публикации!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Causes of Lower Class Corruption and Personality Traits of Corrupt Officials Based on Opinions of Students with Different Attitudes to Bribery
Dzhaneryan Svetlana Tigranovna

Doctor of Psychology

associate professor at Southern Federal University

344038, Russia, Rostov Region, Rostov-on-Don, str. M.Nagibin's prospect, 13, of. 239

swetdjan@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Gvozdeva Dar'ya Ivanovna

PhD in Psychology

associate professor at Southern Federal University

344038, Russia, Rostov Region, Rostov-on-Don, str. M. Nagibin's prospect, 13, of. 239

gvozdeva@sfedu.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 
Abstract. The article presents the results of the research that was aimed at studying causes of low class corruption and personality traits of bribetakers and bribegivers based on the analysis of the conative component content (causes and personality traits of bribetakers and bribegivers) of certain attitude to bribery demonstrated by young people. One's attitude to bribery is defined as a persistent purpose-and-means attitude when a person perceives bribery as the purpose and means in satisfying one's needs and values. The research was carried out using the following methods: questionnaire survey, content-analysis, tests, and statistical methods of data processing. The authors have analyzed similar attitudes to bribery demonstrated by school, college and university students, in particular, attitude to bribery as an unlawful conduct, business deal, or immoral behavior. According to the results of the research, respondents name various situations as what causes bribe giving, while bribe taking is associated ith particular personality traits of corrupt officials. The authors prove that differentiation between personality traits of bribegivers and bribetakers demonstrated by college and university students is determined by the certain attitude to bribery. The novelty of the research is caused by the fact that the authors analyse causes of bribery and personality traits of each participant in a corrupt conduct as demonstrated by young people with different attitudes to bribery as a phenomenon of lowwer class corruption, and differentiate between personality traits of bribegivers and bribetakers as viewed by urban youth. The results of the research can be used in practical lessons aimed at teaching anti-corruption values to students. 
Keywords: causes of bribery, personality traits of bribegivers, school students, college students, students, personality traits of bribetakers, lower class corruption, conative component of one's attitude, attitude to bribery, bribery
DOI: 10.25136/2409-8701.2017.6.24744
Article was received: 16-11-2017

Review date: 16-11-2017

Publish date: 10-01-2018

This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here.

References
1.
Vannovskaya O.V. Lichnostnye determinanty korruptsionnogo povedeniya // Izvestiya Rossiiskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im A.I. Gertsena. SPb. 2009. №102. S. 323-328.
2.
Fan I.B. Politiko-psikhologicheskie aspekty vosproizvodstva korruptsii // Nauchnyi ezhegodnik Instituta filosofii i prava Ural'skogo otdeleniya RAN. 2014. T.14. Vyp. 4. S. 91-104.
3.
Pestruilov A.S., Rudakov L.V. Korruptsiya kak mirovoe antiobshchestvennoe yavlenie: istoriya, psikhologicheskie aspekty protivodeistviya / /Internet zhurnal Mir nauki. 2016. T.
4.
№3. 23s. http://mir-nauki.com/PDF/27PDMN316/pdf. 4.Kamenskii E.G. Korruptsionnaya kul'tura: teoretiko-kontseptual'nyi podkhod // Vestnik Instituta sotsiologii. 2014. №4 (11). S. 75-91.
5.
Reshetnikov M. Psikhologiya korruptsii. Utopiya i antiutopiya. SPb.: Vostochno-Evropeiskii institut psikhoanaliza, 2008.-136s.
6.
Gaivoronskaya, Y.V., Filonenko, T.V. Corruption in Russia: cause and effect relations // Asian Social Science. 2015. V. 11. № 13. PP. 206-211.
7.
Keyzerova, J.V. Corruption as a social phenomenon // Contemporary Problems of Social Work. 2016. V. 2. № 1 (5). PP. 112-119.
8.
Borisova, E. An analysis of the mechanisms of the social control of corruption in the higher education system // Russian Education and Society. 2014. V. 56. № 4. PP. 27-39.
9.
Weidman, J.C., Enkhjargal A. Corruption in higher education // International Perspectives on Education and Society. 2008. V. 9. S. 63-88.
10.
Gosudarstvennomu sluzhashchemu o korruptsii / avtor-sost. E.I. Atagimova. M.: FBU NTsPI pri Minyuste Rossii, 2015.-56s.
11.
Kurdyumov A.B, Gnezdilov S.B., Kiselev V.V. Korruptsionnaya psikhologiya v Turtsii i Rossii i perspektivy formirovaniya antikorruptsionnogo povedeniya // Chelovecheskii kapital. 2016. № 2 (86).-S. 7-9.
12.
Golubovskii, V.Yu., Sinyukova, T.N. Formy i vidy proyavleniya korruptsii v sovremennom rossiiskom obshchestve // Politicheskaya lingvistika 2015. №2 (52). S. 240-245.
13.
Vasyakin B.S., Deberdeeva N.A., Pozharskaya E.L. Nekotorye psikhologicheskie aspekty protivodeistviya korruptsii // Uspekhi sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya. 2016. №3. T.2. S. 61-63.
14.
Dzhaneryan S.T. Types of Attitudes in Students to Bribery as the form of corruption // The Social Sciences. 2016. T. 11. № 27 S3. S. 6475-6480.
15.
Dzhaner'yan S.T., Gvozdeva D.I., Panina E.A. Tipy otnosheniya k vzyatochnichestvu u shkol'nikov i uchashchikhsya kolledzhei // Psikholog. 2017. № 4. S. 65-81.
16.
Dzhaneryan S.T., Gvozdeva D.I. and Astafyeva I.N. Understanding of the Causes of Bribery by Students with Various Types of Attitude to Bribery // The Social Sciences. 2016. V.11. Issue 27. R. 6459-6464.
17.
Garifullin R. Psikhologicheskie i psikhoterapevticheskie podkhody k probleme vzyatochnichestva i vzyatkomanii (novaya kontseptsiya resheniya problemy korruptsii). 2011. [Elektronnyi resurs]. URL: http://psyfactor.org/lib/corruption2.htm.:
18.
Chernysheva E.V., Ermosh V.O. Sotsial'no-psikhologicheskoe osmyslenie korruptsionnogo povedeniya // Ustoichivoe razvitie Rossii: vyzovy, riski, strategii. Materialy KhIKh mezhdunarodnoi nauchno-prakticheskoi konferentsii gumanitarnogo universiteta 12-13 aprelya 2016. V 2-t. T1. Ekaterinburg: Gumanitarnyi universitet, 2016 S. 275-286.
19.
Liferov A.P. Rossiiskii korruptsioner: nekotorye psikhologo-pravovye shtrikhi k portretu // Psikhologo-pedagogicheskii poisk. 2016. № 1 (37). S. 11-28.
20.
Zhuravlev A.P., Yurevich A.V. Psikhologicheskie faktory korruptsii // «Psikhologicheskaya gazeta: My i Mir». №2[197]. 2013. http://yurpsy.com/files/fakt/172.htm
21.
Yanitskii M.S. Tsennostnoe izmerenie massovogo soznaniya. Min-vo obr. i nauki RF, Kem gos.un-t.-Novosibirsk: Izdatel'stvo SO RAN, 2012. – 237s.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.

Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website