Статья 'Когнитивная закрытость и установки в межличностных отношениях' - журнал 'Психолог' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Psychologist
Reference:

Cognitive Closure and Attitudes in Interpersonal Relationships

Yasin Miroslav Ivanovich

PhD in Sociology

associate professor of the Psychological Department at Plekhanov Russian University of Economics

117997, Russia, Moskovskaya oblast', g. Moscow, per. Stremyannyi, 36, of. kafedra Psikhologii

nadsaw@yandex.ru
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.25136/2409-8701.2017.5.22350

Review date:

19-03-2017


Publish date:

27-10-2017


Abstract.

Cognitive closure is a mechanism of cognitive activity that saves one's psyche from excessive, contradictory and needless information. This construct is widely used to describe cognitive styles and explain certain socio-psychological mechanisms, mass communications psychology and psychology of religion. Apparent cognitive closure relates to such factors as stereotypization, dogmatism, rigidity of attitudes and aggressive response to conflicts. The author makes an assumption that in order to save psyche from needless information, one may try to avoid communication, certain types of interpersonal relationships or excessive involvement. The hypothesis was experimentally proved based on the research that involved 140 people. The author has used such diagnostic tests as Cognitive Closure Orientation by A. Kruglyansky and Destructive Attitudes in Interpersonal Relationships Test by V. Boyko. The results of the research prove the following: cognitive closure and communicative attitudes are mostly related through the assertiveness parameter. Thus, assertiveness has a negative correlation with most cognitive closure factors. In the same way, accumulation of negative impressions of communication with others has a negative correlation with love for order, assertiveness and cognitive closure. 

Keywords: defense mechanisms, cognitive processes, communication, determination, interpersonal relationships, aggression, cognitive style, cognitive closure, locus of control, cognitive dissonance
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Kholodnaya M. A., Kognitivnye stili. O prirode individual'nogo uma. 2-e izd. SPb. : Piter, 2004. 384 s.
2.
Nartsissova S.Yu. Fenomen kognitivnogo stilya v psikhologii // Nauka i sovremennost'. 2011. № 8-2. S. 77-83.
3.
Kruglanski A. W., Webster D. M., Motivated Closing of the Mind: "Seizing" and "Freezing' // Psychological Review. Vol. 103 (2). 1996. R. 263-283.
4.
Altemeyer B., Hunsberger B. Authoritarianism, religious fundamentalism, quest, and prejudice // International Journal for the Psychology of Religion. 1992. Vol. 2. P. 113–133.
5.
Leak G.K., Randall B.A. Clarication of the link between right-wing authoritarianism and religiousness: the role of religious maturity, // Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion. 1995. Vol. 34. P. 245–252.
6.
Saroglou V., Beyond dogmatism: the need for closure as related to religion // Mental Health, Religion & Culture. Vol. 5 ( 2 ). 2002. R. 183-193.
7.
McGregor I., Nash K., Prentice M., Reactive approach motivation (RAM) for religion // Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010. Vol. 99 (1). R. 148-61.
8.
Kruglanski A. W., The psychology of closemindedness. New York, NY: Psychology Press. 2004. 192 p.
9.
Gordon G., Dalton S., Kolbert J.B., Kanyongo G.Y and Crothers L.M., Proactive and Reactive Aggression and Cognitive and Affective Empathy among Students in Middle Childhood // International Journal of School and Cognitive Psychology. 2014. Vol.1 (2) (http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/ 1234-3425.1000105)
10.
Shkuratova I.P., Kognitivnye stili kak regulyatory mirovospriyatiya lichnosti / V sb.: Pervaya rossiiskaya konferentsiya po kognitivnoi nauke. Tezisy dokladov. – Kazan': KGU. 2004. S. 256-257.
11.
Shkuratova I.P. Kognitivnyi stil' i obshchenie. – Rostov-n/D, 1994. 156 s.
12.
The Need for Closure Scale-[Elektronnyi resurs]. – Rezhim dostupa: http://terpconnect.umd.edu/~hannahk/NFC_Scale.html (Obrashchenie: 26.04.2016)
13.
Boiko V. V. Energiya emotsii v obshchenii: vzglyad na sebya i na drugikh / – M: Informatsionno-izdatel'skii dom «Filin''». 1996. 472 s.
14.
Rotter J. V. Generalized expectancies for internal versusexternal control of reinforcement. // Psychological Monographs: General and Applied. 1966. Vol. 80 (1). P. 1-28.
15.
Yasin M.I. Ekstremistskie deistviya pod znakom religioznosti // Fundamental'nye i prikladnye issledovaniya v sovremennom mire. 2016. № 14-3. S. 93-97.
16.
Yasin M.I. Psychology of religion: objectives and methods // V sbornike: Humanities and Social Sciences in Europe: Achievements and Perspectives Proceedings of the 5th International symposium. Koenig L. (Ed.). 2014. C. 143-146.
17.
Yasin M.I. Ustanovki v mezhlichnostnykh otnosheniyakh u sovremennykh buddistov // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. 2016. № 5. C. 436-439
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website