Причины легализации абортов в ХХ веке и современные дебаты о моральной допустимости абортов

Саввина Ольга Владимировна

doi:10.7256/2306-0425.2014.3.12657


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Psychologist

Reference:

Savvina O.V. — The Reasons of Legalizing Abortions in the XXth Century and Modern Debates on the Moral Acceptability of Abortions // Psychologist. – 2014. – № 3. – P. 221 - 243. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0425.2014.3.12657 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=12657

The Reasons of Legalizing Abortions in the XXth Century and Modern Debates on the Moral Acceptability of Abortions

Savvina Ol'ga Vladimirovna

PhD in Philosophy

Docent, the department of Ethics, Peoples' Friendship University of Russia

117198, Russia, g. Moscow, ul. Miklukho-Maklaya, 10/2

olgaivanova05@mail.ru

Другие публикации этого автора

DOI:

10.7256/2306-0425.2014.3.12657

Review date:

11-08-2014

Publish date:

25-08-2014

Abstract.

In the article the reasons of legalization of abortions in the XX century in the countries of Europe, Great Britain, the USA and others are considered. The purpose of this consideration is forecasting of further development of discussion about legalization of abortions (mainly – abortions "at a request") in the world countries; definition of current trends in the solution of a question on abortions at the state level; and also identification of defining social groups in the solution of this question. Object of research is discussion about legalization of the abortions, developed in the XX century. In research the method of the philosophical analysis, a cultural and historical method, historical information, the analysis of the legal documents legalizing abortions "at a request" in the West countries (Great Britain, the USA) is used. The author comes to a conclusion that in the XX century priests and the medical personnel - the former social groups which had priority influence on the solution of a question of legalization of abortions lost the force and were compelled to participate in a new bioethical discourse on an equal basis with inhabitants and other experts. Formation of a bioethical discourse in the countries of Europe, Great Britain and the USA allowed to make decisions on abortion to women that on the one hand, released them, and with another – deprived a bioethical discourse of influence on a solution of the problem of legalization of abortions.
Keywords: bioethics, abortion, Michel Foucault,, medical ethics, Hippocrates, Natanson, bioethical discourse, embryon, rights of the fetus, reproductive rights
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Al-Matary A., Ali J. Controversies and considerations regarding the termination of pregnancy for Foetal Anomalies in Islam // BMC Medical Ethics, 2014 doi:10.1186/1472-6939-15-10 – [elektronnyi resurs]-URL: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/15/10 (data obrashcheniya 08.05.14).
2.	Gippokrat. Izbrannye knigi. / Per. s grech., V.I.Rudneva. M., Biomedgiz, 1936.-S. 85.
3.	Marquis D. Abortion revisited. // The Oxford handbook of bioethics. Ed. Steinbock B.-New York University Press, 2007. pp 395-416
4.	Warren M.A. On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion Biomedical Ethics. 4th ed. T.A. Mappes and D. DeGrazia, eds. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc. 1996, pp. 434-440
5.	Card R.F. Infanticide and the Liberal View on Abortion. / Bioethics, V.14, issue 4, 2000. – pp. 340-351. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8519.00201/abstract
6.	Siluyanova I. Etika vrachevaniya. Sovremennaya meditsina i pravoslavie.-M.: Izd-vo Moskovskogo Podvor'ya Svyato-Troitskoi Sergievoi lavry. 2001. – [elektronnyi resurs]-URL: http://orthomed.ru/pms.php?id=library.ethics.00034#s20 (data obrashcheniya 08.05.14).
7.	Marquis, D. (1989), ‘Why Abortion Is Immoral’, Journal of Philosophy, 89: 183–202. – [elektronnyi resurs]-URL: http://faculty.polytechnic.org/gfeldmeth/45.marquis.pdf (data obrashcheniya 08.05.14).
8.	Natathanson B. Confessions of an Ex-Abortionist. // Catholic Education Resourse Center. – [elektronnyi resurs]-URL: http://www.catholiceducation.org/articles/abortion/ab0005.html (data obrashcheniya 08.05.14).
9.	Facts speak louder then “Silent Scream” Planned Parenthood Federation of America. – [elektronnyi resurs]-URL: http://www.plannedparenthood.org/files/PPFA/Facts_Speak_Louder_than_the_Silent_Scream_03-02.pdf (data obrashcheniya 08.05.14).
10.	Savvina O.V. Eticheskii smysl skazaniya ob Avraame. // Sluzhenie vysshei shkole rukovoditelya, pedagoga, uchenogo. K 50-letiyu professora V.A. Tsvyka. / Red. N.S. Kirabaeva.-M.: RUDN, 2012. S. 282 – 287.
11.	WMA Statement on Embryonic Stem Cell Research. // Ofitsial'nyi sait Vsemirnoi meditsinskoi assotsiatsii – [elektronnyi resurs]-URL: http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/s1/ (data obrashcheniya 08.05.14).
12.	Bentam I. Vvedenie v osnovaniya nravstvennosti i zakonodatel'stva. – M.: ROSSPEN. 1998.
13.	Coleman P.K. Abortion and mental health: quantitative synthesis and analysis of research published 1995-2009.-The British Journal of Psychiatry. – 2011, vol. 199, pp. 180-86. doi: 10.1192/bjp.bp.110.077230 – [elektronnyi resurs]-URL: https://www.dropbox.com/s/ihtyq99a6kmbuyw/abortion%20mental%20health.pdf (data obrashcheniya 08.05.14).
14.	Karimi M. Termination of pregnancy due to Thalassemia major, Hemophilia, and Down's Syndrome: the views of Iranian physicians. // BMC Medical Ethics 2008, 9:19, doi:10.1186/1472-6939-9-19 – [elektronnyi resurs]-URL: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6939/9/19 (data obrashcheniya 08.05.14).
15.	Fuko M. Intellektualy i vlast': Izbrannye politicheskie stat'i, vystupleniya i interv'yu / Per. s frants. S. Ch. Ofertasa pod obshchei red. V. P. Vizgina i B. M. Skuratova.-M.: Praksis, 2002. S. 222-236
16.	Tishchenko P.D. Bio-vlast' v epokhu biotekhnologii. M.: IF RAN, 2001.
17.	Ivanyushkin A.Ya. "Ot etiki Gipokrata k bioetike" // Meditsinskoe pravo i etika №1, 2004. S. 24-26.
18.	Abortion Act 1967 // Portal legislation.gov.uk/ – [elektronnyi resurs]-URL: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1967/87 (data obrashcheniya 08.05.14)
19.	Savvina O.V., Kosorukova A.A., Matukhin P.G., Maksimova O.B., Alieva O.G. Mezhdistsiplinarnye IT-proekty kak tekhnologiya podgotovki polilingval'nykh kontrol'no-izmeritel'nykh materialov po kursu «Bioetika». // NB: Pedagogika i prosveshchenie. - 2014. - 2. - C. 127 - 138. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4188.2014.2.11369. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pp/article_11369.html

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.