MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Politics and Society
Reference:
Skiperskikh, A. V.
Homo Politicus:
Between Rebellion and Submission
// Politics and Society.
2014. № 6.
P. 682-688.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=54243
Skiperskikh, A. V. Homo Politicus:
Between Rebellion and Submission
Abstract:
The author of the present article shares his thoughts on the choice between rebellion and submission
made by human from time to time. Very often the choice made by man conflicts with the ruling authority
which is interested in preventing de-legitimation by creating political institutions aimed at maintaining
a consensus between the society and the government. However, these institutions cannot be all the way efficient
because it is impossible to fully satisfy man’s need in justice. The author shows there can be certain
moral reasons for man choosing to rebel. Rebellion and submission are very topical issues due to the objectivity
of the authority itself and its countersand as a dialectical opposition. By using the political hermeneutic
method and addressing to the writings of political philosophers studying this problem, the author tries to
understand the reasons of such a moral choice. The author underlines that opposition to all initiatives of the
authority is unavoidable because opposition is an essential part of the authority as it is. A choice of a particular
man to either rebel or submit is also related to a particular political situation triggering a certain
strategy of man’s behavior. Noteworthy that political transformations considerably increase chances for the
radical model of behavior because the level of uncertainty grows and the hope for one’s own resources becomes
evident. Quite on the contrary, periods of political stability significantly increases the need for opposition
making man choose conformal models of interaction with the government.
Keywords:
Rebellion, authority, de-legitimation, opposition, counterstand, submission, political actor, ruling elite, protest, repression.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Konson G.R.. Bunt Karamazova — bolezn' ili poyavlenie gostya iz Preispodney?. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2014.-№ 4.-C. 437-448. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2014.4.11515
2. Marina Kulishova. Sal''vador Dali: igry sumasbrodnogo buntarya.. // Istoricheskiy zhurnal.-2010.-№ 3.-C. 36-59.
3. V.N. Porus. O pretenziyakh «anarkhicheskoy filosofii» (po povodu davney stat'i A.M.Pyatigorskogo). // Filosofiya i kul'tura.-2010.-№ 9.-C. 56-61.
4. Kabanov P.A. Politicheskaya prestupnost' v Rossii: kriminologicheskiy analiz istoricheskogo razvitiya // NB: Voprosy prava i politiki. — 2013.-№ 1.-S.285-304. DOI: 10.7256/2305-9699.2013.1.474. URL: http://e-notabene.ru/lr/article_474.htm
5. Manoylo A.V. Strategii "upravlyaemogo khaosa" v usloviyakh khaotizatsii mezhdunarodnykh otnosheniy: mif ili real'nost'? // NB: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya.-2014.-1.-C. 1-3. DOI: 10.7256/2306-4226.2014.1.10750. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/wi/article_10750.html
6. Kamyu A. Iznanka i litso: Sochineniya. – M.: ZAO Eksmo-Press, Khar'kov: Folio, 1998. – 864 s.
7. Skiperskikh A.V. Poverkhnosti protesta: osobennosti politicheskogo pis'ma v sovremennoy Rossii. // Politicheskaya lingvistika. – 2014.-№ 1. – S. 108 – 113.
8. Prishvin M. Sobranie sochineniy v vos'mi tomakh.-T.8. Dnevniki, 1905-1954. – M.: Khudozhestvennaya literatura, 1986.-759 c.
9. Garr T. Pochemu lyudi buntuyut. – SPb.: Piter, 2005. – 461 s.
10. Skiperskikh A.V., Garbuz A.A. Kontsept «performans»: poyavlenie sub'ekta. // Izvestiya Tul'skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki.-2013.-№ 3-1.-S. 173 – 182.
11. Kamyu A. Buntuyushchiy chelovek. Filosofiya. Politika. Iskusstvo. Per. s fr. – M.: Politizdat, 1990. – 415 s.
12. Fuko M. Vosstavat' bespolezno? // Neprikosnovennyy zapas.-2011.-№ 5 (79).-S. 16-19.
13. Skiperskikh A.V. Vyzovy provintsial'nogo protesta. // Svobodnaya mysl'.-2011.-№ 12.-S. 45-50.
14. V.V. Dubovitskiy. Fenomeny strakha i uvazheniya v estetike vozvyshennogo Edmunda Berka i Immanuila Kanta (Sravnitel'nyy analiz). // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2011.-№ 12.-C. 6-14.
15. L. M. Popov, R. V. Merkel'. Svyaz' emotsional'no-volevykh kharakteristik i avtoritarnosti lichnosti.. // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika.-2010.-№ 11.-C. 14-21.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|