MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Politics and Society
Reference:
Titov P.S.
On participation of the legal representative in evidence-gathering
// Politics and Society.
2013. № 6.
P. 746-751.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=54086
Titov P.S. On participation of the legal representative in evidence-gathering
Abstract:
This work offers several propositions, intended
for the optimization of criminal procedure Law at the preliminary
investigation stage from the point of view of the
legal representative in terms of evidence-gathering. Analyzing
scientific points of view on the issue at hand, effective
Laws and current legal practice, and using analogy
and historical experience, the author concludes that the
creation of a new institute of criminal procedure Law – the
institute of procedure-related actions of the legal representative;
and the implementation of which into Criminal procedure
Law, is a necessity. This construct will allow to
regulate the new institute in Russian Criminal Procedure
code, and to regulate the conditions and forms of the legal
representative’s procedure in information-gathering. This
article offers a scientific approach, which would allow
the legal representative takes part in evidence-gathering,
while assisting the investigator, or the Court by gathering, its procedural consolidation and its presentation to proper
personnel. Using this approach in criminal procedure will
allow for a broad and objective research of the crime scene
and ensure due process in modern criminal procedure.
Keywords:
Jurisprudence, criminal Law, evidence, proof, means for evidence-gathering, legal representative, incriminatory lean, equal rights of prosecution and defense
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Bitokova M.Kh. Pravo sobiraniya dokazatel'stv zashchitnikom i ego osushchestvlenie v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: dis. kand. yur. nauk. M., 2008.
2. Kuptsova S.N. Pravo zashchitnika na sobiranie dokazatel'stv i problema sostyazatel'nosti v ugolovnom protsesse // Sbornik nauchnykh trudov SevKavGTU. Seriya «Gumanitarnye nauki». 2010. № 8.
3. Makarova Z.V. Uchastie advokata-zashchitnika na predvaritel'nom sledstvii. Kuybyshev, 1978.
4. Mikhaylovsvkaya I.B. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii (postateynyy) (6-e izdanie, pererabotannoe i dopolnennoe) / Pod red. I.L. Petrukhina. M.: OOO «TK Velbi», 2008.
5. Navasardyan V.R. Pravo na zashchitu podozrevaemogo, obvinyaemogo i podsudimogo v ugolovnom protsesse. SPb., 2000.
6. Ugolovnyy protsess Rossii: uchebnik / Pod red. V.T. Tomina. M.: Yurayt, 2003.
7. Kommentariy k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii / Pod red. I.L. Petrukhina. M.: OOO «TK Velbi», 2002.
8. Putin V.V. Demokratiya i kachestvo gosudarstva // gazeta «Komersant'», 2012, № 20/P.
9. Smirnov A.V. Modeli ugolovnogo protsessa. SPb., 2000.
10. Stetsovskiy Yu.I. Advokat v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M., 1972.
11. Khromenko V.V. Total'nyy obvinitel'nyy uklon pravookhraniteley // gazeta «Duel'», 2007, № 1-2
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
