Статья 'Идеологизация этносоциологических исследований в советский и постсоветский периоды: институциональное измерение' - журнал 'Политика и Общество' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Politics and Society
Reference:

Barbashin, M.Yu. Ideologization of ethnic and social research during the Soviet and post-Soviet periods: institutional evaluation.

Abstract: The article analyzes the institutional aspects of political ideology’s influence on ethnic and sociological research. The author stresses that the Soviet ethnic research was politicized and was used as method of reinforcing national policies. During the transitional period, ethnic and social academic disciplines became tools of political struggle between ethnic elites. The author concludes that deidealigozation of ethnic studies, which lack positivist moderation, is necessary.


Keywords:

Sociology, Ethnic and Social science, ethnos, ideology, ethics, institutes, authority, management, conflict, ethnic myths


This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article

This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here .
References
1. Cornell S.E., Hartmann D. 1998. Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World. Pine Forge Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
2. Bhattachryya G., Gabriel J. and Small S. 2002. Race and Power: Global Racism in the twenty-First Century (London and New York: Routledge).
3. Hechter M. 2000. Containing Nationalism (New York: Oxford University Press).
4. Drobizheva L. Etnicheskaya sotsiologiya v SSSR i v postsovetskiy Rossii. M. 1998.
5. Chistov K. V. Narodnye traditsii i fol'klor: ocherki teorii. L.: Nauka-Leningradskoe otdelenie, 1986.
6. Sigorsksh M. Brak i brachnye obychai na Kavkaze // Etnografiya. 1930. № 3.
7. Mezhetnicheskie otnosheniya i konflikty v postsovetskikh gosudarstvakh // Set' etnologicheskogo monitoringa i rannego preduprezhdeniya konfliktov. Yuzhnyy federal'nyy okrug. 2001. Avgust №1.
8. Fuller G. E. and Starr S. F. 2003. The Xinjiang Problem (New York: M.E. Sharpe).
9. Entsiklopediya kul'tur narodov Yuga Rossii: V 9 t. T. 1. Rostov-na-Donu: Izd-vo SKNTs VSh. 2008.
10. Osipov A. G. Ferganskie sobytiya 1989 goda (konstruirovanie etnicheskogo konflikta) // Ferganskaya dolina: etnichnost', etnicheskie protsessy, etnicheskie konflikty. M.: Nauka. 2004.
11. Selivanova I.F. Respublika Moldova: khronika Pridnestrovskogo konflikta // Kentavr. 1994. № 4.
12. Gumilev L.N. Etnogenez i biosfera Zemli. L.: Gidrometeoizdat, 1990.
13. Shnirel'man V. A. Byt' alanami: intellektualy i politika na Severnom Kavkaze v KhKh veke. M.: NLO. 2006.
14. Kisilev S. V. Sovremennoe donskoe kazachestvo v inoetnicheskom okruzhenii // Sotsis. 1999. №11.
15. Kuznetsov V.A., Chechenov I. M. Istoriya i natsional'noe samosoznanie // Problemy sovremennoy istoriografii Severnogo Kavkaza. Pyatigorsk: Izd-vo PGLU. 1998.
16. Barbashin M. Yu. Neoinstitutsional'naya kontseptsiya etnichnosti v kontekste osnovnykh napravleniy sovremennoy etnologii // Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye znaniya. 2008. №12.
17. Jenkins K. 1991. Rethinking History (London: Routledge)
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.