Antropova I.
Problem of the future of family half-century afterwards: dialogue with A. G. Kharchev
// Politics and Society.
2016. № 10.
P. 1460-1466.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2016.10.20749 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=20749
«Проблема будущего семьи» полвека спустя: диалог с Харчевым А.Г.
Antropova Yuliya
Doctor of Sociology
Prorector, Institute of Development of Education; Professor, the department of Social and Political Sciences, Ural Federal University of the First President of Russia B. N. Yeltsin
620137, Russia, Sverdlovskaya oblast', g. Ekaterinburg, ul. Akademicheskaya, 16, of. 315
Abstract: The author presents the analysis of the status of the institution of family and childhood in the XXI century, as well as the modern child-parent relationship. At the same time, special attention is given to the phenomenon of the paradoxical development of family and childhood, including the subclinical deprivation of the upcoming generation and “latent” social orphanage, which is caused by the decrease of the quality in child-parent relations, psychological isolation of a child within family, and violence with regards to a child, The author also gives particular attention to the role of family in the primary socialization of childhood, as well as traces the quality of the primary socialization in development of society as a whole. Focus is made on the transformation of family as the social institution, changes of the circumstances under which the family is functioning, as well as accessibility of the childhood infrastructure. The article carries an interdisciplinary character and represents a so-called “dialogue” with A. G. Kharchev pertaining to one of the most essential questions associated with examination of family in sociology of the XX and XXI centuries, namely the development and quality of child-parent relations. A. G. Kharchev’s contribution into the Russian sociology of family is undisputable. As the foundation of the dialogue, the author takes the published in 1964 book by Anatoliĭ Georgievich Kharchev “Sociology of family: Problems of emerging science”. Namely in this work, Kharchev makes an attempt of social forecast of the future of family. In addition to that, the author in the dialogue with A. G. Kharchev contemplates about the future of family in the XXI century, which in many ways depends on the system of measures of assistance and support, which is created by the state and the regions. But most importantly, it depends on the quality of the dialogue between the state and the family.
Keywords:
Children and parent relationship, mental deprivation, subclinical deprivation, hidden social orphanhood, pedagogical culture of parents, the state family policy, Family of the XXI century, future family, family capacity, social forecasting
References
1. Antropova Yu.Yu. Sotsial'nye issledovaniya sovremennoi ural'skoi sem'i: osnovnye trendy zhiznedeyatel'nosti // Uchenye zapiski RGSU. 2010. № 7. S. 218-222.
2. Antropova Yu.Yu. Analiz osnovnykh tendentsii izmeneniya funktsionirovaniya sovremennoi sem'i (na primere sotsiologicheskikh issledovanii v Sverdlovskoi oblasti) // Sotsial'naya politika i sotsiologiya. 2009. № 10(52). S. 429-437.
3. Berger P., Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. Traktat po sotsiologii znaniya. M.: «Medium», 1995. S. 101.
4. Giddens E. Uskol'zayushchii mir: kak globalizatsiya menyaet nashu zhizn' / Per. s angl. M.L. Korobochkina. M.: Ves' mir, 2004. S. 78.
5. Deti reform / Pod red. N.M. Rimashevskoi. M.: Institut ekonomicheskikh issledovanii, 2011. S. 102.
6. Zelikova Yu.A. Vliyanie sotsial'noi politiki i roditel'skikh tsennostei na semeinoe povedenie i vospitanie detei: mezhstranovyi analiz // Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki. 2012. T. 10. № 3. S. 343–360.
7. Maiorova-Shcheglova S.N. Transformatsiya detstva v nachale XXI v.: k utochneniyu kontseptsii sotsial'nogo konstruirovaniya detstva // Vestnik RGGU. 2014. № 4(126). S. 222.
8. Mnogoosevaya klassifikatsiya psikhicheskikh rasstroistv v detskom i podrostkovom vozraste. Klassifikatsiya psikhicheskikh i povedencheskikh rasstroistv u detei i podrostkov v sootvetstvii s MKB-10. M.: Smysl; SPb: Rech', 2003. S. 90.
9. Oberemko O.A. Fragmentatsiya otvetstvennosti v sfere sotsial'nogo sirotstva // Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki. 2009. T. 7. № 2. S. 223–240.
10. Pecherskaya N.V. Mifologiya roditel'stva: analiz diskursivnogo proizvodstva ideal'noi sem'i // Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki. 2012. T. 10. № 3. S. 323–342.
11. Filipova A.G. Sotsial'noe prostranstvo detstva: printsipy markirovaniya territorii // Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki. 2012. T. 10. № 1. S. 79–94.
12. Kharchev A.G. Sotsiologiya sem'i: problema stanovleniya nauki. M.: TsSP, 2003. S. 123.
13. Chernova Zh. Sem'ya i roditel'stvo: diskursivnye predpisaniya i praktiki // Zhurnal issledovanii sotsial'noi politiki. 2012. T. 10. № 3. S. 293-294.
14. Shneider L.B. Sem'ya: oglyadyvayas' vpered. SPb.: Piter, 2013. S. 45.
15. Geiger B.K. The Family in Soviet Russia, Harvard University press. 1968.
16. Krasnova T.V. Gosudarstvennaya semeinaya politika i pravovoi status roditelei: problemy sovershenstvovaniya semeinogo zakonodatel'stva // Pravo i politika. 2015. № 11. C. 1512-1518. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2015.11.16652.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
