MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
Politics and Society
Reference:
Ivushkin A.S.
Socio-economic rights in comparative context of the theory of natural law and the Savigny’s historical school
// Politics and Society.
2016. № 10.
P. 1335-1338.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2016.10.20593 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=20593
Социально-экономические права в сравнительном контексте теории естественного права и исторической школы Савиньи
Ivushkin Aleksandr Sergeevich
Post-graduate student, the department of State-Legal Disciplines, Penza State University
440026, Russia, Penza, Krasnaya Street 40
|
alexivushkin58@gmail.com
|
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2016.10.20593
Received:
30-09-2016
Published:
12-11-2016
Abstract:
The Socio-Economic Rights Institute has a long history of theoretical-practical contemplation within the framework of English-American, as well as Romano-Germanic tradition of law. This article is dedicated to the examination of the role and place of human socio-economic rights in the context of various theories. There rights cannot be viewed as the type of natural rights, as well as they cannot be consider perpetual and inviolable. Only in light of historicism, the progressive importance of the idea of human socio-economic rights becomes clearer. The author carries out a comparative analysis of the natural-legal and historical doctrines, and substantiates the conclusion that the historical school does not deny the positions of the natural school of law, but rather strives for the synthesis of the main results of both theories. Socio-economic rights have to be explored in connection with the institute of individual, or in other words, classic rights and freedoms. Therefore, the individual freedom must be guaranteed in the first place, and only then, we can talk about the guarantees of the socio-economic rights.
Keywords:
historical school of law, Constitution, Savigny, social and economic rights, citizens, property rights, natural rights, evolution, humanism, legislation
References
1. Avak'yan S.A. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossii. Tom 1. M.: Yurist''. 2005. S.641
2. Baglai M.V. Konstitutsionnoe pravo Rossiiskoi Federatsii. 6 izd. M.: Norma. 2007. S.268
3. Sm. Comte A. Catéchisme positiviste ou Sommaire exposition de la religion universelle. Paris. 1890.
4. Sr. Gray J.Ch. The Nature and Sources of the Law. N.Y.: Columbia UP. 1909. P.2
5. Honoré T. Ulpian. Pioneer of Human Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2002
6. Rückert J. Op. cit. P. 59
7. http://www.bahaistudies.net/asma/The-Concept-of-the-Collective-Unconscious.pdf
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|