Ñòàòüÿ 'Òàéíàÿ âîéíà Ôðàíöèè â Áèàôðå' - æóðíàë 'Ïîëèòèêà è Îáùåñòâî' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Politics and Society
Reference:

Òàéíàÿ âîéíà Ôðàíöèè â Áèàôðå

Filippov Vasilii Rudol'fovich

Doctor of History

Filippov Vasiliy RudolfovichLeading researcher, Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences

101000, Russia, Moscow, ul. Spiridonovka, 30/1

rdi-cop@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0684.2016.3.18323

Received:

13-03-2016


Published:

10-04-2016


Abstract: Using the method of historical reconstruction, the author finds out the cause and nature of the Nigerian civil war in 1967-1970. It is one of the bloodiest conflicts on the African continent for the entire post-colonial period. Comprehensive analysis of historical sources, including materials of mass media, memoirs of participants of events, investigative journalism, interviews with famous politics and diplomats, allows you to bring to light the explicit and implicit motives and goals of all parties of the conflict in this bloody confrontation. Particular attention is drawn to elucidating the role of the UK, France, USA, Soviet Union, as well as a number of African countries (such as Gabon and Ivory Coast) in the outbreak of the Civil War in Republic of Nigeria, on the specific manifestations of the geopolitical doctrine of "françafrique" in this conflict. The close connection has been shown between the events in the Republic of Nigeria and the Igbo genocide sociolinguistic groups in the Nigerian region of Biafra. The conclusion that the Elysee Palace for three years supported the Biafran separatists, providing them with logistical and military aid, providing political and diplomatic support to the self-proclaimed Republic of Biafra in order to maintain economic and political preferences of Paris in this oil-rich region. The author believes that the civil war in the Republic of Nigeria has been clear evidence of latent confrontation between France, on the one hand and Anglo-Saxon (US and UK), on the other. And, also, the following conclusion is substantiate – that the assistance of the Soviet Union rendered to the Federal Government of Nigeria was due to the desire to extend the influence of communist ideology in the countries of tropical Africa.


Keywords:

France, global information space, world politics, global insecurity, international relations, diplomacy, interests, state, sequrity, risks

References
1. A nation divided – http://www.economist.com/news/middle-east-and-africa/21627646-africas-lodestar-nation-has-weathered-ebola-extremist-takeover-has-exposed
2. Micheletti P. Sur fond d’indignation et de pétrole, tout a commencé au Biafra – https://www.monde-diplomatique.fr/2008/09/MICHELETTI/16263
3. Tur'inskaya Kh.M. Organizatsiya nepredstavlennykh natsii i narodov: federalizm i separatizm v Afrike // Sovremennaya Rossiya i mir: al'ternativy razvitiya (Zapad i Vostok: mezhtsivilizatsionnye vzaimodeistviya i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya): sbornik nauchnykh statei / pod red. Yu.G. Chernyshova. Dnevnik AShPI ¹ 29. Barnaul, 2013. S. 174.
4. Vasil'ev A.M. Afrika i vyzovy KhKhI v. M., 2012. S. 17.
5. Filippov V.R. Sovetskaya teoriya etnosa. Istoriograficheskii ocherk. M., 2010. S. 65.
6. Filippova E.I. Chto takoe Frantsiya? Kto takie frantsuzy? //Tishkov V.A., Shnirel'man V.A. (otv. red.). Natsionalizm v mirovoi istorii M., 2007. S. 172-227.
7. Filippova E.I. Ponyatie ethnie vo frantsuzskoi nauchnoi traditsii i ego politicheskoe ispol'zovanie // Etnograficheskoe obozrenie. 2007. ¹ 3. S. 52-73.
8. Amselle J-L., M'Bokolo E. Au cœur de l’ethnie. Paris, 1999. P. 41.
9. Kosukhin N.D. Vvedenie // Konflikty v Afrike: prichiny, genezis i problemy uregulirovaniya. M., 2013. S. 7.
10. Dr. Y. The Biafran Civil War and the French Connection – http://afrolegends.com/2011/12/16/the-biafran-war/
11. Natufe I. The Amalgamation of Nigeria and the Quest for a Nation // Federalizm v Afrike: problemy i perspektivy. Federalism in Africa: Problems and Perspectives. Otv. redaktory I. Natufe, Kh. Tur'inskaya. M.: Institut Afriki RAN, 2015. S. 100-101.
12. Guisnel J. Derrière la guerre du Biafra, la France // Histoire secrète de la Ve République. La Découverte, 2006. P. 147-154.
13. American jewish congress – http://www.biafraland.com/1968_biafra%20_report_by_american_jewish_congress.htm
14. Prokof'ev V. Pryzhok «Tushkanchika»-http://www.rg.ru/2014/02/18/bomba-site.html
15. Guerre secrète de la France au Biafra – http://panafricanisme.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Histoire-Afrique-Guerre-France-Biafra.pdf
16. Wilde J. Nigerian civil war: France backed Biafra to the hilt – https://beegeagle.wordpress.com/2010/07/28/nigerian-civil-warfrance-backed-biafra-to-the-hilt/
17. Verschave F.X. La Françafrique. Retranscription de conférences-débat données par F. X. Verschave, président de Survie de 1995 à 2005 – http://survie.org/francafrique/article/la-francafrique.
18. McMillan P. President of France Charles Degaulle supported Biafra remarks he made at a press conference in Paris on 9th September 1968 – http://www.ipob.org/2014/07/president-of-france-charles-degaulle.html
19. Baulin J. La Politique africaine d'Houphouët-Boigny. Éditions Eurafor-Press, 1980. P. 13.
20. Zhirokhov M., Monogonu O. Proshchai, Biafra! Vozdushnaya voina v Nigerii 1967-70 gg. – http://topwar.ru/28594-proschay-biafra-vozdushnaya-voyna-v-nigerii-1967-70-gg.html
21. Verschave F.-X. La Françafrique. Paris, Stock. 2001. P. 150.
22. Soldiers of Fortune // Mercenary-wars – http://www.mercenary-wars.net/biafra/
23. Herrmanns R. Carl Gustaf von Rosen. Stockholm: Wahlström & Widstrand, 1975. P. 57-59.
24. Forsyth F. The Dogs of War. L., Hutchinson i Viking Press. 1974.
25. Forsyth F. The Biafra Story Non Fiction – http://ru.scribd.com/doc/24312280/Frederick-Forsyth-The-Biafra-Story-Non-Fiction#scribd
26. Secret papers reveal Biafra intrigue – http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/589221.stm
27. Kupriyanov P.I. Agiii-Ironsi Dzhonson Tomas Umuankve // Afrika. Entsiklopedicheskii spravochnik. M. Izdatel'stvo «Entsiklopediya», 2010. T. 1. S. 917.
28. Domergue-Cloarec D., Coppolani A. Des conflits en mutation ? De la guerre froide aux nouveaux conflits. Bruxelles, 2003. P. 137-150.
29. Natufe I. , Kh. Tur'inskaya Kh. Predislovie // Federalizm v Afrike: problemy i perspektivy. Federalism in Africa: Problems and Perspectives. Otv. red. I. Natufe, Kh. Tur'inskaya. M.: Institut Afriki RAN, 2015. S. 7-9.
30. Filippov V.R. «Deetnizatsiya territorii» v noveishei istorii Rossii // Federalizm. 2006. ¹ 2 (42). S. 125-142.
31. Manoilo A.V. Siriiskii tupik «Arabskoi vesny». // Vestn. Mosk. Un-ta. Ser. 12. Politicheskie nauki. 2013. ¹6. S. 49-56.
32. Manoilo A.V. Interesy vneshnei politiki SShA v Afganistane. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2012. ¹ 3. S. 76-81.
33. Manoilo A.V. Paradigmy upravleniya mezhdunarodnymi konfliktami: konkurentsiya ili konfrontatsiya. // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. 2011. ¹ 5. S. 135-142.
34. Kuznetsov I.I. Vliyanie demonstratsionnykh effektov na stanovlenie politicheskikh institutov // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 4. - C. 412 - 425. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.17162.
35. Bocharnikov I.V. Terroristicheskaya gruppirovka «Islamskoe gosudarstvo» kak zakonomernoe sledstvie blizhnevostochnoi strategii SShA // Trendy i upravlenie. - 2015. - 4. - C. 395 - 402. DOI: 10.7256/2307-9118.2015.4.17007.
36. Aryamova A.D. Prakticheskaya realizatsiya tekhnologii tsvetnykh revolyutsii v Ukraine v 2004 i 2014 gg.: sravnitel'nyi analiz // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 4. - C. 439 - 442. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.4.17179.
37. Kosenko S.I. Faktor «myagkoi sily» v kul'turnoi diplomatii Frantsii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 2. - C. 197 - 208. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.2.10167.
38. Karyakin V.V. Definitsiya i paradigmy geopoliticheskogo issledovaniya // Konfliktologiya / nota bene. - 2015. - 4. - C. 382 - 394. DOI: 10.7256/2409-8965.2015.4.17442.
39. Kurilkin A.V. Sovremennye podkhody k vedeniyu informatsionnykh voin // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2014. - 1. - C. 75 - 80. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2014.1.10063.
40. Karyakin V.V. Tsivilizatsionnaya antropologiya amerikanskogo ekspansionizma: ot doktriny Monro k global'nomu liderstvu // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2013. - 4. - C. 487 - 468. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2013.4.9722.
41. Saushkin A. Perspektivy otmeny sanktsii v otnoshenii Rossii // Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. - 2015. - 1. - C. 117 - 120. DOI: 10.7256/2305-560X.2015.1.13506.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.