Развитие уголовно-процессуального законодательства о привлечении понятых для участия в следственных действиях

Глущенко Ольга Павловна

doi:10.7256/2454-0684.2015.6.15593


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Politics and Society

Reference:

Glushchenko O.P. The Development of the Criminal Procedure Legislation of Bringing Witnesses to Participate in Investigative Actions // Politics and Society. 2015. № 6. P. 787-792. DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2015.6.15593 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=15593

Развитие уголовно-процессуального законодательства о привлечении понятых для участия в следственных действиях

Glushchenko Ol'ga Pavlovna

Educator, Department of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines of the Krasnodar University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

350005, Russia, Krasnodar Territory, Krasnodar, Yaroslavskaya str., 128

balerinaa002@mail.ru

Other publications by this author

Article was published in rubric "Law and human rights"

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0684.2015.6.15593

Received:

16-06-2015

Published:

30-07-2015

Abstract: The present article conducts a retrospective analysis of the origins of the institute of witnesses in the Russian Federation. The author consistently reveals the main stages in the establishment and development of this institution. It was found out that the starting point for public involvement in the criminal proceedings at the legislative level was the 1649 Council Code, while the 1864 Charter of Criminal Proceedings can be considered to be the foundation for the development of the existing institute of witnesses. In addition, the author separately studied the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Codes of the RSFSR and the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation. In preparation for the work general scientific methods of research were applied, such as analysis, synthesis, induction, deduction, as well as special research methods, including historical, comparative legal and formal-legal. The author mainly focuses on the currently topical regulations regulating the involvement of citizens as witnesses in criminal cases. The positive and negative aspects of the adoption of the Federal Law №23-FL dated March 4, 2013 have been analysed. It is concluded that the activity of the witnesses is still widely ranged, due to the lack of the necessary clarifications of the new law.

Keywords:

reform of the criminal process, investigative actions, institute of witnesses, participants of criminal proceedings, criminal proceedings, criminal procedural law, technical means of fixing, publicity, legislative problems, investigator

References

1. Antonov I.A. Nravstvenno-pravovye nachala ugolovno-protsessual'noi deyatel'nosti: teoreticheskie idei i pravoprimenitel'naya praktika: dis. … dokt. yurid. nauk. SPb., 2005.
2. Afonin V.K. Pravovoe i organizatsionnoe obespechenie uchastiya ponyatykh v dosudebnom proizvodstve po ugolovnym delam: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Lyubertsy, 2012.
3. Boikov A.D. Ugolovnoe sudoproizvodstvo i sudebnaya etika. Kurs sovetskogo ugolovnogo protsessa. Obshchaya chast' / pod red. A.D. Boikova i I.I. Karpetsa. M.: Yurid. lit., 1989.
4. Bykhovskii I.E. Ponyatye // Sotsialisticheskaya zakonnost'. 1972. № 4.
5. Danil'yan A.S. Osobennosti polucheniya informatsii o pokhishchennom imushchestve // Vestnik Krasnodarskogo universiteta MVD Rossii. 2013. № 4.
6. Latypov V.S. Inye uchastniki ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva: problemy teorii, normativnogo regulirovaniya i praktiki: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Ufa, 2013.
7. Mikhailov A. Institut ponyatykh-arkhaizm rossiiskogo ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva // Zakonnost'. 2003. № 4.
8. Ob''yasnitel'naya zapiska k proektu Ustava ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. SPb., 1862.
9. Rudnev A.V. Nadzornaya deyatel'nost' prokurora v stadii realizatsii funktsii sudebnogo kontrolya za proizvodstvom protsessual'nykh deistvii // Ugolovnyi protsess. 2008. № 10.
10. Seleznev M. Ponyatoi ili svidetel'? [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: http: // www.lawmix.ru. (data obrashcheniya 01.04.2015).
11. Sobornoe ulozhenie 1649 goda. Zakonodatel'stvo tsarya Alekseya Mikhailovicha / Sost., avt. predisl. i vstupit. statei V.A. Tomsinov. M.: Zertsalo, 2011.
12. Ugolovnyi protsess: uchebnik / A.V. Smirnov, K.B. Kalinovskii. 4-e izd., pererab. i dop. M.: KNORUS, 2008.
13. Ustav ugolovnogo sudoproizvodstva. Sistematicheskii kommentarii. / Pod obshch. red. prof. M.N. Gerneta. Izd. M.M. Ziva. M., 1994.
14. Khitrova O.V. Razvitie instituta ponyatykh v UPK RF // Advokatskaya praktika. 2005. № 3.
15. Khitrova O.V. Uchastie ponyatykh v rossiiskom ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve. M.: Spark, 1998.
16. Sharun V.V. Organizatsionno-takticheskie osobennosti proizvodstva otdel'nykh sledstvennykh deistvii s uchastiem ponyatykh: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk. Kaliningrad, 2007.
17. Shurukhnov N.G. Klassifikatsiya sledstvennykh deistvii, predusmotrennykh ugolovno-protsessual'nym kodeksom Rossiiskoi Federatsii // Aktual'nye problemy sovremennogo ugolovnogo protsessa Rossii. Samara, 2010. Vyp. 5.
18. [Elektronnyi resurs] URL: http://constitution.garant.ru/history/ act1600-1918/3137. (data obrashcheniya 03.05.2015).

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.