Ñòàòüÿ 'Ïðîòèâîñòîÿíèå â êèáåðïðîñòðàíñòâå â êîíòåêñòå ðàçâèòèÿ âîåííîé ñòðàòåãèè' - æóðíàë 'Ïîëèòèêà è Îáùåñòâî' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Politics and Society
Reference:

Ïðîòèâîñòîÿíèå â êèáåðïðîñòðàíñòâå â êîíòåêñòå ðàçâèòèÿ âîåííîé ñòðàòåãèè

Starkin Sergey Valer'evich

Doctor of Politics

Professor, the department of Political Science, Institute of International Relations and World History of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod; Leading Scientific Associate, International Interdisciplinary Laboratory "Study of Global and Regional Socio-Political Processes", N. A. Dobrolyubov State Linguistic University of Nizhny Novgorod

603000, Russia, g. Nizhnii Novgorod, ul. Ul'yanova, 1, kab. 307

starkinserge@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0684.2015.3.14566

Received:

24-02-2015


Published:

03-04-2015


Abstract: The problematic issues raised by the author in this paper, are worded as follows: firstly, what does the concept of "cyberwar" actually mean for the political establishment? Secondly, to what extent is the concept of "cyberwar" applicable for the understanding of global trends, the future of military strategy and instruments for its implementation? The author is conducting a study of the strategic context in which there are currently undergoing debates about "cyberwar" (in particular, the declining value of direct military force perceived by some researches), and also analysing the difficulty of achieving the real strategic effect through "pure" cyber attacks.In this paper, taking into account the objectives, traditional for the humanities comparative methods are used, as well as case studies, and the theory of political decision-making.The main conclusion of the study is that the military cyberpower does not have enough of strategically strong potential, as it was painted in recent years. According to the author, there is every reason to believe that, like military air power, it will be an important element in future joint operations of ground, air and naval forces; but the concept of cyberwar as a strategically crucial form of interstate conflict is misleading and meaningless diversion of efforts and resources on useless objects.


Keywords:

international security, national security, cyber-threats, confrontation in cyberspace, cyberrevolution, cybersecurity, information security, Russia, USA, NATO

References
1. Cowen T. The Age of the Infovore. London: Penguin, – 2011. – 315 p.
2. Poe M. A History of Communications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, – 2010. – 273 p.
3. Liang Qiao, Xiangsui Wang. Unresticted Warfare. Beijing: PLA Literature and Arts Publishing House, – February 1999. – 285 p.
4. Halliday F. The World at 2000: Perils and Promises. London: Palgrave, – 2000. – 139 p.
5. Strachan H. On War, A Biography. London, – 2007. – 263 p.
6. Lebow R.N. A Cultural Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, – 2008. – 317 p.
7. Smith R. The Utility of Force. London, – 2005. – 267 p.
8. Angell N. The Great Illusion. London, – 1910. – 437 p.
9. Holsti K. The State, War and the State of War. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, – 1996. – 237 p.
10. Strachan H. One War, Joint Warfare // RUSI Journal. – 2009. – vol. 154. – ¹. 4. – R. 22-35.
11. Kaldor M. New and Old Wars. Cambridge: Polity, – 2006. – 316 p.
12. Nagl J. Let’s Win the Wars We’re In // Joint Force Quarterly. 1st quarter 2009. – no. 52. – R. 20–26.
13. Hoffman Frank G. Conflict in the 21st Century: The Rise of Hybrid Wars. Washington DC: Potomac Institute, – 2007. – 341 p.
14. General Sir David Richards. Future Conflict and Its Prevention: People and the Information Age’, International Institute for Strategic Studies, 18 January 2010. URL: http://www.iiss.org/recent-key-addresses/general-sir-david-richards-address/. (data obrashcheniya 12.11.2014).
15. Betz D. J., Stevens T. Cyberspace and War // Adelphi Series. – 2011. – V. 51:424. – R. 75-98.
16. Buzan B., Waever O., Wilde Jaap de. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, – 1998. – 267 p.
17. BBC, The Virtual Revolution, Episode 2 ‘The Enemy of the State?’, aired on BBC2, 6 February 2010. URL: http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b00n4j0r (data obrashcheniya 12.11.2014).
18. Fuller J.F.C. The Reformation of War. London: Hutchinson, – 1923. URL: http://www.archive.org/stream/reformationofwar00fulluoft /reformationofwar00fulluoft_djvu.txt (data obrashcheniya 12.11.2014).
19. Cyberspace Operations. United States Air Force Doctrine Document 3–12. – 15 July 2010. – R. 10. URL: http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/afdd3-12.pdf (data obrashcheniya 12.11.2014).
20. Byman D., Waxman M. Kosovo and the Great Air Power Debate // International Security. – Spring 2000. – vol. 24. – no. 4. – R. 5–38.
21. Information Systems Security / Joint Security Commission, Redefining Security. Washington DC, 28 February 1994. URL: http://www.fas.org/sgp/library/jsc/chap8.html (data obrashcheniya 12.11.2014).
22. McMaster H.R. Learning from Contemporary Conflicts to Prepare for Future War // Orbis. – 2008. – vol. 52. – no. 4. – R. 564–584.
23. Fukuyama F. Konets istorii. M., – 2005. – 316 c. Fukuyama F. Konets istorii. M., – 2005. – 316 c.
24. Robb J. Brave New War. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons, – 2007. – 146 p.
25. Adams J. The Next World War. New York, – 1998. – 317 p.
26. Liddel Gart B. Strategiya nepryamykh deistvii. M., – 2014. – 265 c. Liddel Gart B. Strategiya nepryamykh deystviy. M., – 2014. – 265 c.
27. Clarke R. Cyber War. New York, HarperCollins, – 2010. – 253 p.
28. Klauzevits K. O voine. V 3-kh t. M., – 2009. – T.1. – 295 s. Klauzevits K. O voyne. V 3-kh t. M., – 2009. – T.1. – 295 s.
29. Arquila J., Ronfeldt D. Cyberwar is Coming / in Arquila and Ronfeldt (eds), In Athena’s Camp: Preparing for Conflict in the Information Age. Santa Monica, CA: RAND, – 1997.
30. V. N. Konyshev, A. A. Sergunin Remilitarizatsiya Arktiki i bezopasnost' Rossii // Natsional'naya bezopasnost' / nota bene. - 2011. - 3. - C. 55 - 67.
31. Sergunin A.A. KONTsEPT «VOENNAYa BEZOPASNOST''» I EVOLYuTsIYa VOENNO-POLITIChESKOGO MYShLENIYa POSTSOVETSKOI ROSSII // Voprosy bezopasnosti. - 2012. - 2. - C. 119 - 140. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_183.html
32. Shchuplenkov O.V. Metodologicheskie aspekty natsional'noi bezopasnosti Rossii // Voprosy bezopasnosti. - 2014. - 2. - C. 60 - 110. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7543.2014.2.11662. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/nb/article_11662.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.