Ñòàòüÿ 'Ïðîáëåìà ïðåäìåòíîñòè ïîëèòè÷åñêîãî ìûøëåíèÿ' - æóðíàë 'Ïîëèòèêà è Îáùåñòâî' - NotaBene.ru
ïî
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Politics and Society
Reference:

Ïðîáëåìà ïðåäìåòíîñòè ïîëèòè÷åñêîãî ìûøëåíèÿ

Traverse Tat'yana Mikhailovna

PhD in Psychology

Ph.D. in Psychology, Associate Professor of Department of Social Psychology, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv (Ukraine)

03022, ul. Lomonosova, 81, kv. 812, Kiev, Ukraine
traversay@ukr.net

traversay@ukr.net

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0684.2015.3.14336

Received:

29-01-2015


Published:

03-04-2015


Abstract: The subject of this work is the political thinking structure. In the modern world the psychological characteristic of subjectivity as a property of political thinking acquires a new understanding that conditions the relevance of this study. We consider that one of the defining aspects for psychology of political thinking is the position in relation to its content. The author considers in detail the subject political field, in which the political actor (subject in politics), serves as the bearer of certain meanings and senses. Therefore, the subjectivity of political tasks being solved, first of all, is determined by the social-cultural conditions and types of the executed political activity. The system-strategic conception of political thinking, in which it is considered through three components (cognitive, operational, and regulatory-personal), was elaborated and analysed from the anglet of the following properties: subjectivity, practicality, conceptuality, and creativity, which were organized systemically and strategically determined. The subjectivity of thinking is provided by separation of the relevant material by the actor and its inclusion into the corresponding thought forms. Upon the change of content the structure of political thinking also gets rearranged. Not only the sequence of tactics is changed in the system of thinking strategies, but also the content of thinking operations in the structure of tactics. At that some tactics acquire dominant meaning, and the form of thinking action is changed. The complexities emerging in the implementation of the thinking action on the concrete political material, point out the qualitative specificity of the systemic-strategic content of thinking activity and necessity of its substantial rearrangement upon the change of subsubject of the thought.


Keywords:

mental action, subobject of thought, subject of politics, political consciousness, political thinking, polysubjectness, subjectivity of political thinking, politics, properties of thinking, notionality

References
1. Bruner Dzh. Issledovanie razvitiya poznavatel'noi deyatel'nosti / Dzh. Bruner, R. Oliver, P. Grinfild. – M. : Pedagogika, 1971. – 391 s.
2. Vasyutins'kii V. ²nterakts³ina psikholog³ya vladi : monograf³ya / V. Vasyutins'kii. – K. : KSU, 2005. – 492 s.
3. Vygotskii L. S. Myshlenie i rech' / L. S. Vygotskii // Sobr. soch. : v 6 t. – M.: Pedagogika, 1982. – T. 2. – 404 c.
4. Gadamer G. G. Aktual'nost' prekrasnogo / G. G. Gadamer. – M. : Iskusstvo, 1991. – 368 s.
5. Gurevich K. M. Problemy differentsial'noi psikhologii / K. M. Gurevich. – M. ; Voronezh : MODEK, 1998. – 131 s.
6. Klauzevits K. F. O voine / K. F. Klauzevits ; per. A. K. Rachinskogo. – M. : EKSMO, 2013. – 512 s.
7. Koul M. Kul'tura i myshlenie. Psikhologicheskii ocherk / M. Koul, S. Skibner. – M. : Progress, 1977. – 261 s.
8. Mamardashvili M. K. Formy i soderzhanie myshleniya / M. K. Mamardashvili. – M. : Azbuka-Attikus, 2011. – 288 s.
9. Markov S. A. Politicheskie professii / S. A. Markov // Politiya. – 1999. – ¹ 2. – S. 8–19.
10. Pyatigorskii A. M. Razmyshlyaya o politike / A. M. Pyatigorskii, O. B. Alekseev. – M. : Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2008. – 190 s.
11. Rubinshtein S. L. O myshlenii i putyakh ego issledovaniya / S. L. Rubinshtein. – M. : Izd-vo AN SSSR, 1958. – 145 s.
12. Traverse T. M. Sistemno-strateg³al'na kontsepts³ya pol³tichnogo mislennya (zagal'n³ polozhennya) / T. M. Traverse // Aktual'n³ problemi psikholog³¿ : zb³rn. nauk. prats' ²n-tu psikholog³¿ ³m. G.S. Kostyuka NAPNU (2014). K. : Fen³ks, 2014. – T. Kh²². Psikholog³ya tvorchost³. – Vip. 19. – S. 236–241.
13. Khaidegger M. Chto znachit myslit'? / Khaidegger M. // Razgovory na proselochnoi doroge : Izbran. stat'i pozdnego perioda tvorchestva / per. s nem. – M. : Vysshaya shkola, 1991. – S. 134–145.
14. Kheizinga I. Osen' Srednevekov'ya. Issledovanie form zhiznennogo ukalada i form myshleniya v KhIV i KhV vekakh vo Frantsii i Niderlandakh / I. Kheizinga ; pod red. S. S. Averintseva. – M. : Nauka, 1988. – 540 s.
15. Kholodnaya M. A. Psikhologiya intellekta: paradoksy issledovaniya / Kholodnaya M. A. – 2-e izd., pererab. i dop. – SPb. : Piter, 2002. – 272 s.
16. Bandura A. Social cognitive theory and mass communication / Albert Bandura // Media effects: Advances in theory and research / Bryant J. & Zillman D. (Eds.). – Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1994. – 505 r.
17. Linn L. Public Management as Art, Science and Profession / L. Linn. – N.Y. : Chatam, 1996. – 147 r.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.