Erokhin I.Y.
Cossack liberties as a sign of ethnicity Cossacks
// Politics and Society.
2015. ¹ 1.
P. 30-42.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0684.2015.1.14104 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=14104
Abstract: The subject of the study is the Cossacks as a category of ethno-social representations based on the philosophy of freedom of expressions. Shows the need to integrate historical school of law Cossack association in modern society. Indicated that the Cossack communities at all times, there were two forms: social (military servitors) and ethnic (natural). The aim is to describe the situation that on the basis of socio-natural character of the duality of the Cossacks formed controversial history of the Cossacks. Research methodology is characteristic of comparative historical analysis, synthesis monographic study polemical analogy interpretation of generally accepted concepts. Result is that in the article the author regards the principles of Cossack Carta as the basis of ethnic ideology of the Cossack communities, as opposed to the state (Imperial) doctrine of the nature of the Cossack mentality and views. Ways of integrating traditional Cossack way of life of the internal control in the social dynamic environment. Jobs can be used to understand the role of the Cossacks in the development of the Russian state. Many historians directly and openly say that in the XV-XVI centuries., And up to the middle of the XVII century, by all indications Cossack ethnicity Russian statehood was perceived as a foreign element to it, harmful and dangerous. Modern Cossacks Cossack liberties removes the issue in the general concepts and structures of the Cossacks quite important. Conclusion. The paradigm of Russian Cossacks as Russian subethnos based on the recognition of historical facts forming the Cossacks of heterogeneous peoples, while maintaining Slavic, Great anthropological dominant and foundations. In Cossack social community, along with common to the entire population of the dominant ethnic Great features were essential specific group differences in culture, psychology, military servitors lifestyle.