Статья 'Конструирование этно-региональной идентичности на постъюгославском пространстве (случай Черногории)' - журнал 'Политика и Общество' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Politics and Society
Reference:

Конструирование этно-региональной идентичности на постъюгославском пространстве (случай Черногории)

Dokuchaev Denis Sergeevich

PhD in Philosophy

Head of the department of Journalism, Advertising and Public Relations, Ivanovo State University

153005, Russia, Ivanovskaya oblast', g. Ivanovo, ul. Shoshina, 13, kv. 56

den-dokuchaev@mail.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 
Dokuchaeva Natalya Aleksandrovna

PhD in History

Publisher, Scientific Research Institute of Intelligence Studies, Ivanovo State University

153005, Russia, Ivanovo, Shoshina Street 13, office #56

natdok85@gmail.com

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0684.2015.12.13249

Received:

08-10-2014


Published:

17-01-2016


Abstract: This article is dedicated to the analysis of the means of constructing ethno-regional identity on the post-Yugoslavian space. The object of the research is the socio-political reality of the post-Yugoslavian space. The subject is the mechanisms, methods, and practices of legitimization of the political and social identity in the modern Montenegro. The authors note that after the collapse of Yugoslavia the policy of construction of a new sociality was taking place in the newly independent Balkan states in a similar way. Political and intellectual elites strived to break the ties with the past, rewrite history, and change the public consciousness. Similar processes also took place in Montenegro. The main vectors of structuring the ethno-regional identities became the underlining of the ethnic differences between the Serbs and Montenegrins, and creation of the “image of the enemy”. The article examines the ethnic, linguistic, religious and historical aspects of the socio-constructive activity of the political elites of the Montenegro. The social differentiation into Montenegrins and Serbs is only one of the aspects of the complicated ethnic composition of the country. The authors note that the role of the minorities in the construction of the ethno-regional identity of the modern Montenegro is not as evident as it is in the Serb-Montenegrin dichotomy, but the place in the formation of the modern political field of Montenegro is fairly weighty.


References
1. Andriyashevich Zh.M., Rastoder Sh. Istoriya Chernogorii s drevneishikh vremen do 2006 goda. – M. 2010.
2. Berger P. Lukman T. Sotsial'noe konstruirovanie real'nosti. – M. 1995.
3. Bonapart i chernogortsy//Pushkin A.S. Pesni zapadnykh slavyan. URL: http://www.magister.msk.ru/library/pushkin/poetry/pu0712.htm (data obrashcheniya 20.03.2012)
4. Bronevskii V.B. Opisanie Chernogorii //Syn otechestva, Chast' 46. № 28. 1818.
5. Volodina T.A. Istoriya i natsionalizm. URL: http://wap.realhistory.forum24.ru/?1-2-40-00000026-000-0-0 (data obrashcheniya: 05.01. 2012).
6. Deklaratsiya P.E.N. tsentra. URL: http://montenet.com/language/pen-decl.htm (data obrashcheniya: 11.01.2012).
7. Dokuchaev D.S. Regional'naya identichnost': ponyatie, struktura, funktsii.//Filosofiya i kul'tura. 2012. №12.
8. Dokuchaeva N.A. Etnicheskie izmereniya obshchestva i natsional'naya politika Chernogorii v nachale XXI veka// Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedenii. Seriya: Gumanitarnye nauki. 2012. T. 3. № 3. S. 104-107
9. Dmitrevskaya I.V. Mirovozzrenie kak sistema// Soznanie i teoriya mirovozzreniya: Istoriya i sovremennost'. – Ivanovo.1992.
10. Zhiteli oblasti Montenegro ili chernogortsy. // Vestnik Evropy, Chast' 20. № 7. URL: http://www.vostlit.info/Texts/Dokumenty/Serbien/XIX/1800-1820/Murgard/text.phtml?id=8959/ (data obrashcheniya: 12.09.2011).
11. Malakhov V.S. «Neudobstva s identichnost'yu». URL:http://www.intellectuals.ru/malakhov/izbran/8ident.htm (data obrashcheniya: 02.04.2011)
12. Miller A. Rossiya: vlast' i istoriya. URL:http://carnegieendowment.org/files/ProEtContra_3.2009_all_screen.pdf (data obrashcheniya 01.04.2010)
13. Ponomareva E.G. Novye gosudarstva na Balkanakh. – M. 2010.
14. Popisi u Tsrnoi Gori od 1909. do 2003. URL: http://njegos.org/census/princip.jpg(data obrashcheniya: 13.04.2011).
15. Renan E. Chto takoe natsiya? // Renan E. Sobranie sochinenii v 12-ti tomakh. Perevod s frantsuzskogo pod redaktsiei V.N. Mikhailovskogo. T.6. Kiev, 1902. S.100. URL: http://www.hrono.ru/statii/2006/renan_naci.php(data obrashcheniya 14.02.2012).
16. Rovinskii P. Chernogoriya v'' eya proshlom'' i nastoyashchem''. Tom'' II. Chast' 1. – Spb. 1897.
17. Ryabov O.V. Natsional'naya identichnost': gendernyi aspekt (na materiale russkoi istoriosofii)//avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni doktora filosofskikh nauk. – Ivanovo.2000.
18. Stamanoviħ A. Antisrpstvo u uџbenitsi ma istorije u Tsrnoj Gori. –Podgoritsa. 2007.
19. Terziћ S. Ideoloshki koreni tsrnogorske natsije i tsrnogorskogo separatizma. URL: http://njegos.org/past/idroots.htm (data obrashcheniya: 27.04.2011).
20. Uemov A. I. Sistemnyi podkhod i obshchaya teoriya sistem. – M.1978.
21. Chernogoriya i ee zhiteli. // Zhurnal dlya chteniya vospitannikami voenno-uchebnykh zavedenii, Tom. 81, № 323. URL: http://www.vostlit.info/Texts/Dokumenty/Serbien/XIX/1840-1860/Cernog_i_ee_ziteli/text1.phtml?id=9069 (data obrashcheniya: 12.09.2011).
22. Shirokogorov S.M. Etnos: Issledovanie osnovnykh printsipov izmeneniya etnicheskikh i etnograficheskikh yavlenii. – Shankhai. URL: http://www.kunstkamera.ru:8081/siberia/Texts/ShirokogorovEthnos/Chapter01.pdf (data obrashcheniya 15.01.2013)
23. Yamalneev I.M. Etnoregional'naya identichnost' kak politicheskii proekt (na primere Respubliki Tatarstan)//avtoreferat dissertatsii na soiskanie uchenoi stepeni kandidata politicheskikh nauk. – Kazan'. 2005.
24. Andrijašević Ž.M. Crnogorska crkva 1852-1918. –Nikšić. 2008.
25. Checkel J.T.,. Katzenstein P.J. European Identity. Cambridge University Press. 2009.
26. Crna Gora u brojkama. – Podgorica 2010.
27. Greenberg R. Language and identity in the Balkans. Oxford University Press. 2004.
28. Gregory A. Montenegro: getting its story straight//Transitions online, 3 March.URL: http://www.ceeol.com (data obrashcheniya: 02.02. 2009)
29. Kiossev A. The dark intimacy: maps, identities, acts of identification/Balkan as a metaphor. Between globalization and identity (edited by Bjelić D, Savić O.) Massachusetts Institute of Technology. 2002.
30. Mérimée P. La Guzlaouchoix de poesies illyriques. Recueilliesdans de la Dalmatie, la Bosnie, la Croatieetl’Herzegowine. Strasbourg, http://archive.org/stream/laguzlaouchoixde00mruoft#page/160/mode/2up (data obrashcheniya: 20.04.2012).
31. Nagel J. Constructing ethnicity: creating ethnic identity and culture//Social problems. 1994. Vol. 41, No.1, Feb.
32. Popis stanovništva, domaćinstava i stanova u Crnoj Gori 2011. godine. Crna Gora. Zavod za statistiku, broj 83. Podgorica, 12.07.2011. godine.
33. Vlahović D. “Dan kada je rođena Crnogorska nacija 1. maj 1945. Mestorođenja Borbaorgan KPJ”.URL: http://www.srpskapolitika.com/Tekstovi/Komentari/2006/034.html (data obrashcheniya: 23.04.2012).
34. Ustav Crne Gore. Podgorica, 22.oktobra 2007. godine. Član 13.
35. Wilmer F. Identity, culture, and historicity. The social construction of ethnicity in the Balkans.URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20672505 (data obrashcheniya: 13.04.2012)
36. A.M. Siyukhova. Osmyslenie sotsial'noi i kul'turnoi roli mifopoeticheskogo tvorchestva s pozitsii filosofov antichnosti: proektsiya na teoriyu elit // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
37. A. A. Kulagin. Etnicheskaya i religioznaya identifikatsiya druzskoi obshchiny // Istoricheskii zhurnal: nauchnye issledovaniya. – 2012. – № 2. – S. 104-107.
38. A. Shazhinbatyn. Etnichnost' v kontekste chelovecheskoi prirody // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. – 2012. – № 5. – S. 104-107.
39. V.Ts. Khudaverdyan. Natsional'nye men'shinstva i immigranty v sisteme sotsial'nykh otnoshenii: sotsial'no-filosofskoe izmerenie // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2012. – № 7. – S. 104-107.
40. I.A. Kuyan. «Natsional'nyi suverenitet»: problemy opredeleniya ponyatiya i soderzhaniya // Pravo i politika. – 2013. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1811-9018.2013.02.19
41. A.S. ogly Alekperov. Mul'tikul'turalizm v prostranstve mezhdu politikoi i kul'turoi // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2013. – № 3. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2013.03.8
42. Shazhinbatyn A.. Etnoantropologicheskaya kontseptsiya Zh.-Zh. Russo // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2014. – № 1. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.1.10103
43. Manzarkhanova L.V.. Mezhdistsiplinarnyi podkhod v issledovanii traditsionnoi kul'tury // Filosofiya i kul'tura. – 2014. – № 2. – S. 104-107. DOI: 10.7256/1999-2793.2014.2.1076
44. D.S. Dokuchaev Regional'naya identichnost':
ponyatie, struktura, funktsii // Filosofiya i kul'tura. - 2012. - 12. - C. 15 - 22.

45. Borisov S.V. Rondo ili Nauka i priroda // NB: Filosofskie issledovaniya. - 2013. - 8. - C. 147 - 247. DOI: 10.7256/2306-0174.2013.8.785. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/fr/article_785.html
46. N. A. Khrenov L. N. Gumilev i protivorechiya v kul'turnoi
identichnosti // Kul'tura i iskusstvo. - 2012. - 6. - C. 7 - 17.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.