Статья 'Экономические стереотипы российских семей через призму пословиц и поговорок' - журнал 'Социодинамика' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Sociodynamics
Reference:

Economic stereotypes of Russian families through the prism of proverbs and sayings

Kruglova Elena Leonidovna

ORCID: 0000-0003-2714-3864

PhD in Sociology

Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology, Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation

125167, Russia, Moscow region, Moscow, Leningradsky ave., 49, office 515

ELKruglova@fa.ru

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7144.2023.7.43831

EDN:

VKXSSA

Received:

17-08-2023


Published:

10-09-2023


Abstract: Stereotypes and prejudices can influence our views and decisions in various spheres of life, including the economy. The author addresses the most important social group – the family and examines the features of the economic behavior of all its members in comparison with the models and patterns of behavior described in Russian proverbs and sayings. The family, both nuclear and extended, is the main object of research. Being the foundation of the state, the family remains the most important source of information for understanding the economic and financial culture of the population, the conditions for its formation and identifying strong points for further development. Sociological content analysis is chosen as the main method of analysis. The article is written at the intersection of sociological, linguistic, historical and philosophical sciences. The scientific novelty of the presented research is both the problematic topic itself, which was not previously presented in the scientific field, and the unification of three time modes during the author's analysis: past, present and future. During the content analysis, the author identified five thematic groups of proverbs and sayings that have semantic references to finance, attitude to money and economic roles in the family. Each of the groups is accompanied by up-to-date data from secondary sociological research and statistics in order to compare, highlight common and different in the economic life of Russian families over the past centuries. The focus of the research is focused on analyzing the dynamics of changes in the attitude of members of the Russian family to finance and the strength of the influence of economic stereotypes on families of the XXI century, expressed through specific linguistic forms. The conclusions of this research are of interest to a wide range of readers whose professional or social interests include economic sociology, demography, Russian history and historical linguistics, as well as population issues.


Keywords:

economic stereotypes, financial literacy, family, financial behavior, proverb, saying, family values, budget, economic culture, famiy budget

This article is automatically translated. You can find original text of the article here.

Introduction

Each generation proclaims that it lives in a period of transformations, constant changes and turbulence; about the inability to follow the old laws and rules; about the transition to a qualitatively new level of development of both society as a whole and individuals within it.

            Designated in the XXI century . The "new gender order" [1] gave an understanding of the changes taking place at the level of gender relations, and the globalization of economic systems suggests that such changes are taking place all over the world.

            However, do not forget the fact that traditional values have always been characteristic of Russia, many stereotypes are stable and the memory of the past is strong. Therefore, in this work we propose to turn to such tools of cognition of social and historical reality as proverbs and sayings and analyze them from the point of view of studying economic stereotypes inherent in our ancestors and passed down through generations to modern families. Interest in paremiology, a branch of philology that deals with the study of various kinds of sayings, to which we refer, first of all, proverbs and sayings, has increased in recent years. This is largely due to the understanding that language carries centuries-old knowledge and can be an element of the research tools of various sciences [2]. Through proverbs and sayings, people passed on their accumulated experience, accumulated the memories of their ancestors for posterity [3].Referring to this source, the main methods of this research were chosen general scientific: analysis, synthesis, analogy and sociological – content analysis.

Research methods and methodology

Before proceeding to the direct description of the results of the study, it is necessary to clarify several fundamental points concerning the methodology of selecting proverbs and sayings used in the work:

- first of all, the correct interpretation of the concepts themselves is important. We take as a basis the definition given by V.I. Dahl, since it is he who can rightfully be considered the founding father of the very process of studying proverbs and sayings. "A proverb is a short saying, a teaching, more in the form of a parable, an allegory, or in the form of an everyday sentence; it turns into a proverb or a simple turn of speech, and says about itself: A proverb is not for nothing."[4] The author defines the proverb already in his later work: "A proverb is a roundabout expression, figurative speech, a simple allegory, a way of expression, but without a parable, without judgment, conclusion, application; this is one first half of the proverb" [5]. Also, V.I. Dahl explained its value when collecting the material: with the help of proverbs and sayings, one can analyze the thoughts of the people, the stereotypes of their thinking about a particular event, phenomenon, and also come to general conclusions about the spiritual and moral component of the Russian people. Proverbs and sayings are part of the popular discourse and reflect stable ideas about the practices adopted in society at a certain time [6]. Thus, the definitions of V.I. Dahl and his collection of proverbs and sayings serve as the theoretical basis of our research;

- secondly, it is necessary to designate the principle of selection of the studied proverbs and sayings. As units of content analysis, those were selected that reflect the principles, ideas, provisions related to the financial side of family life, as well as what is now designated as the "economic culture of the family".

In addition, during the selection, we paid attention to the linguistic component, that is, sayings were used in which there are words such as "money (and any of their designations), finance, expenses, expenses, fees, earnings, etc." directly related to the economic sphere, which was facilitated by the presence of thematic sections in Dahl's work V.I. Those proverbs and sayings that have a more social than economic connotation were not included in the final selection. Although, as will be described below, we have identified a separate group of "socio-economic roles in the family", close attention is paid to economic roles.

The total number of studied proverbs and sayings amounted to 122 units. At the same time, we did not take into account the degree of their popularity and frequency of use in the modern world;

- during the analysis, we were interested in how the views expressed by our ancestors in proverbs and sayings on the family budget, income and culture of its distribution, spending principles, etc. are reflected in the modern world, which of the seemingly remnants of the past is still strong in the modern Russian family, or have we completely abandoned the experience of the previous ones generations. Therefore, it was decided that it was necessary to draw parallels with modern realities by bringing data from sociological surveys and statistics. This kind of research has not been conducted before, although the field of paremiology itself is quite popular and, as Vernikov A.V. and Kurysheva A.A. found out, the base of the electronic library ELIBRARY contains more than a thousand articles, to one degree or another, addressed to the study of proverbs and sayings. However, most of their scientific field is represented by philological and pedagogical sciences: for example, the connection between paremiology and humanitarianism is shown [7]; research in linguo-axeological and linguoculturological aspects [2]; psychological characteristics of the people reflected in proverbs and sayings [8]; the role of proverbs in everyday psychology [9] and much more, while economics and sociology are rare [10].

From an economic point of view, A.V. Gorshkov conducted a rather deep analysis of proverbs and sayings [11], which focuses on diligence, the condemnation of acquisitiveness, the ideal of modesty, in other words, represents the economic culture of the Russian person from a positive point of view. Our analysis assumed the selection of proverbs and sayings suitable for the research tasks, without taking into account their positive or negative orientation, however, as will be described below, our conclusions are close in tone to those described by Gorshkov A.V. Also, the concept of "money" in paremiology was noted by Ermakova N.V., who compared Russian and French proverbs. a practitioner [12], and Karachina O.E. - with English-language sources [13].

In the foreign tradition, there is an experience of turning to paremiology [14], which we pay tribute to, but take into account more in theoretical terms, since the practical field reflects national and linguistic peculiarities and should be studied in accordance with this understanding.  

Analysis of proverbs and sayings by thematic blocks

As mentioned above, during the content analysis, 122 units were selected, which were further grouped into 5 thematic groups: earnings/income, accumulation/preservation, spending/expenditure, socio-economic roles in the family, attitude to finance and general stereotypes concerning the financial and economic sphere of the family. Let's move on to their more detailed analysis.

1. Earnings/income.

Through the prism of proverbs and sayings, the Russian family seems to be hardworking, which for the sake of achieving well-being is accustomed to rely only on itself and its work:

· "If you want to eat rolls, don't sit on the stove";

· "Move so that the money is kept",

· "Where there is work, there is plenty, and in a lazy house — empty",

· "Money loves work."

In modern Russia, the number of sources of income has increased. But, nevertheless, wages remain the main one. According to Rosstat, in 2022, the share of household income from entrepreneurship increased (from 5.5 in 2021 to 6.2%), social benefits (from 20.6 to 20.7%), and property (from 5.7 to 5%) and wages (from 57.3 to 57.2%) decreased [15].

From this group, one can distinguish the positive aspects of the economic culture of the Russian family: emphasis on honest work and income from it, motivation to work, positive motivation [16],[17].

2.Accumulation/saving

The practice of saving, postponing "for a rainy day" came to us from our distant ancestors. Back in the Stone Age, people realized that you can't use or spend everything at once, you need to have a reserve. Proverbs and sayings preserved by the middle of the XIX century (at the time of the publication of the work by V.I. Dahl) also remind us of the importance of savings [18]:

· "Every penny is put on the account: a saved penny saves a ruble",

· "The one who lives needlessly, who saves money",

· "Take care of the money about a rainy day."

According to the results of a study carried out by Sberbank Insurance (the results are presented on the official website of Sberbank), Russians on average would like to accumulate 370 thousand rubles. At the same time, only every second respondent firmly expressed intentions to save money, and every fifth (22%) definitely will not do it.

By the end of 2022, 54% of respondents had savings. People under 25 and over 55 are more inclined to savings behavior, and Russians of the most working age save less. In our opinion, there are several reasons for this: firstly, working people are more inclined to believe that they will be able to earn money if necessary, so it is not necessary to have savings. Secondly, they are more likely to have mortgage and debt obligations to banks, therefore, income is spent on their repayment. Thirdly, unfortunately, middle–aged Russians are not financially literate enough and do not believe that savings are an obligatory part of financial behavior. Young people under the age of 25 in Russia have a higher level of financial culture, which is a consequence of the educational policy in this area, and the generation over the age of 55 has life experience, which often replaces financial education and teaches people to have savings.

3. Expenses/expenses

All the units selected in this group for analysis can be conditionally divided into two: one calls for spending as little as possible, and taking care of things bought and taking care of things; and the second tells about the hardships of running a family budget: money is spent quickly, expenses are difficult to distribute (see Table 1).

Table 1.

Examples of proverbs and sayings on the topic of spending/expenses

Table 1.

The examples of proverbs and sayings on the topic of spendings

Group 1 (examples)

Group 2 (examples)

Thrift is not stinginess

It's freezing outside, and money is melting in your pocket

Until you buy it, spare the money, but if you buy it, spare the thing

Money is like water: it floats to no one knows where

Source: compiled by the author.

As can be seen from the examples above, our ancestors did not focus on specific items of expenditure. There are probably several reasons for this: firstly, for the average family, spending used to be the same and there were no thoughts that it was possible to spend money on something other than the usual things, and, secondly, there was no choice itself [19].

In the XXI century, in addition to mandatory expenses (such as, for example, housing and communal services and taxes), consumers have a huge selection of goods and services, which significantly expands the number of budget items, and also requires large amounts of money, since an ever smaller percentage of the population lives off subsistence farming or practices the principles of social exchange.

According to the results of a study by the consulting company Yakov and Partners in 2022, the average check of Russians increased for housing and communal services, medicines and medical services, products, communications and the Internet, as well as household chemicals. At the same time, the demand for luxury goods, travel, restaurants and electronics decreased. Since March 2022, more and more Russians have begun to switch to a savings model of behavior. "Russian consumers, having shown an extremely high degree of loyalty to certain networks, for the most part changed the set of brands in the grocery basket: 39% of them — due to price increases, 33% - due to the withdrawal of familiar brands from the market, and 21% — for testing domestic production. However, so far less than half of those who have transferred have been satisfied with the replacement," the report says (presented on the official website of Yakov and Partners).

Thus, at this point we see differences in the economic practices of our contemporaries and ancestors: at least until the middle of the XVIII century (the time of collecting proverbs and sayings by V.I. Dahl), the main goal of people was to spend as little as possible, in the modern world there are many budget items that cannot be reduced. However, the fact remains unchanged that the majority of the population is in need and very carefully approach the issue of planning their expenses [20] [21].

4. Socio-economic roles in the family

This group of proverbs and sayings seems to be one of the most interesting, because, firstly, it directly combines the social and economic component in the object under study, secondly, it has two clear trends opposite in meaning, and thirdly, it provides an opportunity for a qualitative comparison of socio-economic roles and ideas about them with modern stereotypes [22] [23].

Conventionally, the two distinguished groups can be designated as "the primacy of the social" and "the primacy of the material" in the family.

 In the first case, the people, through proverbs and sayings, express the idea that good relationships are the basis of a family, not money, and also highlight specific social roles that have come down to our days (the husband is the breadwinner, the wife is the hostess) [24] [25]:

· "Family consent is most expensive",

· "Harmony in the family is wealth",

· "The husband carries the horse, and the wife necks the shirt",

· "The husband is a builder of the house, a warder of poverty."

In the second selected group, the leading role in family well-being is assigned to finance: if there is money, then the family gets along. Moreover, this applies not only to the husband-wife couple, but also to other relatives (most often referred to mother-in-law):

· "The husband is in debt, and the wife is in silk",

· "A husband loves a rich wife, but a mother—in-law loves a thorny one."

However, despite the differences in the meanings of these two groups of floorboards and sayings, they have the same general message – material stability and prosperity are necessary for family happiness. It is difficult to refute this statement in the XXI century [26].

The main controversial issue remains the role and contribution of each partner to the family budget [27]. Russia has one of the largest wage gaps between men and women: according to TASS, the difference is 30%. The second important reason for the possible unequal contribution to family income is the period of the decree, when a woman with a child /children is almost completely dependent on her husband. 54% of male respondents in a study conducted by the SuperJob portal answered that their salary is higher or significantly higher than that of their wife. The proportion of women earning more than their husband increases with age. An equal contribution to the family budget was noted only by 18% of respondents, both male and female (the full results of the study are provided by the portal banki.ru ) [28] [29].

Thus, we come to the conclusion that stereotypes about socio-economic roles and position in the family, reflected in proverbs and sayings about two centuries ago, are reflected in modern life [30] [31].

5. Attitude to finance and general stereotypes concerning the financial and economic sphere of the family

The last group we have identified logically combines all the previous points, focusing on the role that money played in family life and how it affected relationships.

Most proverbs and sayings recognize the leading role of money in the well-being of the family, and also have a touch of fatality, saying that you can't earn a lot of money, but they are needed and people are willing to go to a lot for them:

· "Money goes to money",

· "The worst of all troubles is when there is no money",

· "For money and the devil will dance",

· "Expensive, yes cute, cheap, yes rotten."

Nevertheless, one can also find the opposite, more socially significant statement: people are more important than money, and human relationships cannot be bought or measured materially:

· "People are everything, and money is trash";

· "The hut is cramped, but the soul is clean."

It is obvious that now we can meet both of these positions in the modern world, they are not the product of a certain historical epoch, but rather reflect the socio-psychological characteristics of people.

Conclusion

It is worth noting that the economic stereotypes that exist among Russian families can be quite accurate "products" of historical memory, but most of them reflect the low level of economic culture of the population and can lead to incorrect decisions in financial management. Every second resident of Russia assesses their level of financial literacy as unsatisfactory.

In this paper, the task was not to develop a set of measures to solve this problem, however, it is worth highlighting one of the most obvious and effective approaches, based on the fact that we are talking about stereotypes and patterns of behavior that have been formed for centuries, and this is training. In this context, we mean a whole range of measures aimed at the transfer of information, the introduction of new educational technologies, the promotion of financial knowledge in the media, etc. In other words, it is necessary to carry out mass work aimed at replacing old, obsolete and non-working scenarios of financial behavior with relevant and adequately responding to modern challenges.

The results of the conducted content analysis in comparison with modern statistics and sociological research data clearly demonstrate the influence of established, stable intergenerational stereotypes on the economic behavior of our contemporaries. Integration and sharing of ancestral experience and current knowledge in the financial and economic sphere will make it possible to competently build both personal and family finances, and will strengthen the family as a social institution.

References
1. Sillaste, G.G. (2019). Социальные транзиции и формирование нового гендерного порядка [Social transitions and the formation of a new gender order]. Woman in Russian society, 2, 3-16.
2. Bredis, M.A., & Lomakina O.V. (Eds.). (2020). Paremiology without borders. Moscow: RUDN.
3. Snegirev, I. (1831). The Russians in their proverbs: reasoning and research on Russian proverbs and sayings. Moscow: In the University Printing House.
4. Dal, V. I. (1989). Толковый словарь живого великорусского языка: в 4 т. [Explanatory dictionary of the living Great Russian language: in 4 volumes]. Moscow: Russian language.
5Пословицы русского народа: сборник В. И. Даля. [Proverbs of the Russian people: a collection of V. I. Dal]. (2009). Moscow: Russian language.
6. Moiseeva, I. Yu., & Chudina E. (2004). Прагматические функции пословиц и поговорок [Pragmatic functions of proverbs and sayings]. Bulletin of Orenburg State University, 11, 170-172.
7. Lysikova, N.P. (2022). Паремиология в контексте гуманитаристики: поликультурный аспект [Paremiology in the context of humanitarianism: a multicultural aspect]. Humanities in the new reality: problems, approaches, values. Collection of works. Saratov, 480-486.
8. Ivanov, A.V. (2015). Пословицы как отражение национального менталитета [Proverbs as a reflection of national mentality]. Idnakar: methods of historical and cultural reconstruction, 4(29), 91-99.
9. Baranova, O. G. (2006). Роль русских пословиц и поговорок в обыденной и научно-практической психологии [The role of Russian proverbs and sayings in everyday and scientific-practical psychology]. Socio-cultural problems of modern youth: materials of the International Scientific-practical Conference, Novosibirsk: NGPU, part 2, 13-20.
10. Vernikov, A.V., & Kurysheva A.A.(2023). Отношение к жизни не по средствам в русских пословицах и поговорках [Attitude to life beyond your means in Russian proverbs and sayings]. Economic sociology, 24(3), 33-57.
11. Gorshkov, A.V. (2011). Русские пословицы и поговорки как выражение национальной экономической культуры [Russian proverbs and sayings as an expression of national economic culture]. Bulletin of ChelSU, 36, 28-33.
12. Ermakova, N. V.(2012). Параллелизм концепта «Деньги» в русской и французской паремиологии [Parallelism of the concept of "Money" in Russian and French paremiology]. Russian Journal of Education and Psychology, 10, 70-75.
13. Karachina, O. E. (2015). Долг в русских и английских паремиях [Debt in Russian and English paroemias]. National Association of Scientists, 6.3, 67-70.
14. Hoffman R. R., & Honneck P. (1987). Proverbs, Pragmatics, and the Ecology of Abstract Categories. Cognition and Symbolic Structures: The Psychology of Metaphoric Transformation. Norwood: Ablex Publishing, 121-140.
15. Rosstat [website]. Retrieved from https://rosstat.gov.ru/folder/313/document/189829
16. Gorshkov, A. V. (2011). Русские пословицы и поговорки как выражение национальной экономической культуры [Russian proverbs and sayings as an expression of national economic culture]. Bulletin of ChelGU, 36, 28-30.
17. Khudoley, N.V. (2017). Национальный код культуры и его актуализация в пословицах, поговорках и классических литературных текстах [National code of culture and its actualization in proverbs, sayings and classical literary texts]. Polylinguality and transcultural practices, 4, 643-653.
18. Orlova, A.I. (2020). Пословицы и поговорки о семейном бюджете: история и современность [Proverbs and sayings about the family budget: history and modernity]. Collection of scientific papers "Young scientist", 18(343), 226-230.
19. Adapa, S., & Sheridan, A. (2021). A case of multiple oppressions: women's career opportunities in Malaysian SME accounting firms. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(11), 2416–2442.
20. Bondarenko, V.A. (2002). Из истории экономической культуры России [From the history of economic culture of Russia]. Moscow.
21Пословицы [Proverbs]. (2018). Moscow: economic newspaper.
22. Lihachev, D.S. (2000). Разыскивается отправная точка: статьи, беседы, заметки о русской культуре XIX - XX веков [Looking for a starting point: articles, conversations, notes about Russian culture of the XIX–XX centuries]. Saint-Petersburg.
23. Demin, M.V. (2018). Социально-психологические аспекты экономической культуры семьи [Socio-psychological aspects of the economic culture of the family]. Moscow: academic avenue.
24. Cvetkov, O.V. (2019). Потребительские расходы семьи и формирование семейного бюджета [Family consumer spending and the formation of the family budget]. Economist, 6, 52-59.
25. Bonal, X., & González S. (2020). The impact of lockdown on the learning gap: family and school divisions in times of crisis. Int. rev, 635-655. doi:10.1007/s11159-020-09860-z
26. Alayo, M. and others. (2020). Mapping family firm internationalization research: Bibliometric and literature review. Review of Managerial Science, 15, 1517–1560. doi:10.1007/s11846-020-00404-1
27. Byrne, J. and others. (2021). Gender gymnastics in CEO succession: Masculinities, femininities and legitimacy. Organization Studies, 42, 129–159. doi:10.1177/0170840619879184
28. Hernández-Lara, A.B., & Gonzales-Bustos, J.P. (2020). The influence of family businesses and women directors on innovation, Applied Economics, 52, 36–51. doi:10.1080/00036846.2019.1638496
29. Kubiček, A., & Machek, O. (2019). Gender-related factors in family business succession: A systematic literature review. Review of Managerial Science, 13, 963–1002. doi:10.1007/s11846-018-0278-z
30Экономическое поведение и управление домашним хозяйством [Economic Behavior and Household Management]. (2020). In S. Ilisheva (Ed.), Moscow: High School of Economics.
31Экономическое поведение домохозяйств: анализ и моделирование [Economic Behavior of Households: Analysis and Modeling]. (2019). In B.Sazonova, V.Lebedeva (Eds.). Moscow: Academy.

First Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

In the peer–reviewed article "Economic stereotypes of Russian families through the prism of proverbs and sayings", the subject of the study is proverbs and sayings as tools for cognition of social and historical reality. The purpose of the study is to analyze proverbs and sayings from the point of view of studying economic stereotypes inherent in our ancestors and passed down through generations to modern families. The research methodology is based on the unjustified representation of proverbs and sayings as some stereotypes. The author writes that "the definition of V.I. Dahl and his collection of proverbs and sayings serve as the theoretical basis of our research." But there is no evidence of their own that proverbs and sayings are stereotypes of behavior, as there are no references to works that reveal this relationship. The empirical basis of the study was the principles, ideas, provisions related to the financial side of family life, as well as what is now referred to as the "economic culture of the family". The total number of studied proverbs and sayings amounted to 122 units, which were combined into 5 thematic blocks: earnings/income, accumulation/preservation, spending/expenditure, socio-economic roles in the family, attitude to finance and general stereotypes concerning the financial and economic sphere of the family. In total, about half of the proverbs and sayings were analyzed in the work, out of the stated 122 units. The proverbs and sayings presented have a positive connotation. In this regard, questions arise: 1. And how would the author interpret the sayings "The wife rules, so the husband wanders around the neighbors", "The husband is the head, the neck is the wife, where the neck goes, the head goes", "The husband, like a small child, requires supervision". They clearly contradict the author's distribution of socio-economic roles in the family (the husband is the breadwinner, the wife is the hostess). 2. And how were these particular proverbs selected: according to the level of popularity among the population or in accordance with some inner author's belief? Some of the proverbs presented are clearly not popular. Analysis, synthesis, and modeling are stated as the main general scientific research methods. But modeling as a method of creating and researching models is clearly not used in the work. The relevance of the study of economic stereotypes of Russian families is determined by the need to find mechanisms for their optimization, contributing to effective socio-economic development in general and successful adaptation of large masses of people to its consequences. Of course, changes in society require special study of the direction of changes in public consciousness and its compliance with the realities that exist at the present time. Due to the lack of elaboration of the research methodology, it is not possible to draw a conclusion about its novelty. In general, the study is characterized by a certain sequence. The content meets the requirements of the scientific text. The article contains well-chosen data from modern statistics and sociological research, revealing the situation in the areas of earnings/income, accumulation/preservation, spending/expenditure, socio-economic roles in the family, attitude to finance and general stereotypes concerning the financial and economic sphere of the family. The bibliography of the publication is generally sufficient. It includes 20 publications. Thus, there is an appeal to the main opponents from the field under consideration, but it requires expansion through significant works that would reveal the possibility of considering proverbs and sayings as stereotypes of behavior. It should also be noted that the literature in the part of the monographs is not designed correctly (there is no indication of the publication and the total number of pages). Conclusion: The article "Economic stereotypes of Russian families through the prism of proverbs and sayings" currently has a certain heuristic potential. It will be of interest to specialists in economic sociology. The work can be published after making corrections to the methodological part.

Second Peer Review

Peer reviewers' evaluations remain confidential and are not disclosed to the public. Only external reviews, authorized for publication by the article's author(s), are made public. Typically, these final reviews are conducted after the manuscript's revision. Adhering to our double-blind review policy, the reviewer's identity is kept confidential.
The list of publisher reviewers can be found here.

Various philosophers, cultural scientists, and sociologists talk and write about how important the family is for Russian society today. It is the family, as well as a number of other traditional values, that are systemically important for our country. Russian President Vladimir Putin notes that "a prosperous, strong family with children is the future of Russia." It is no coincidence that in recent years, the Day of Family, Love and Fidelity, dedicated to the memory of Peter and Fevronia, has entered the series of national holidays. And although significant changes have taken place over the centuries, in particular the transformation from a patriarchal family to a modern family of a partner type, nevertheless many steoreotypes and patterns of behavior report from the depths of centuries, and some of them can be understood with the help of proverbs and sayings. These circumstances determine the relevance of the article submitted for review, the subject of which is the economic stereotypes of Russian families. The author sets out to analyze the principles of selection of proverbs and sayings, as well as the principles of interpretation, to identify with the help of proverbs and sayings the economic stereotypes inherent in our ancestors and passed down through generations to modern families. The work is based on the principles of analysis and synthesis, reliability, objectivity, the methodological basis of the research is a systematic approach, which is based on the consideration of the object as an integral complex of interrelated elements. The author also uses the content analysis method. The scientific novelty of the article lies in the very formulation of the topic: the author seeks to characterize the economic stereotypes of Russian families through the prism of proverbs and sayings. Considering the bibliographic list of the article, as a positive point, we note its versatility: in total, the list of references includes over 30 different sources and studies, which in itself indicates a serious amount of preparatory work done by its author. Among the sources attracted by the author, we note first of all the "Explanatory Dictionary of the living Great Russian language" by V.I. Dahl, various proverbs, as well as materials from Rosstat. From the studies used, we will point to the works of I.A. Orlova, N.V. Khudolei, A.V. Gorshkov, which focus on various aspects of paremiology. Note that the bibliography of the article is important both from a scientific and educational point of view: after reading the text of the article, readers can turn to other materials on its topic. In general, in our opinion, the integrated use of various sources and research contributed to the solution of the tasks facing the author. The style of writing the article can be attributed to scientific, at the same time understandable not only to specialists, but also to a wide readership, to anyone who is interested in both the institution of the family in general and proverbs and sayings about the family in particular. The appeal to the opponents is presented at the level of the collected information received by the author during the work on the topic of the article. The structure of the work is characterized by a certain logic and consistency, it can be distinguished by an introduction, the main part, and conclusion. At the beginning, the author defines the relevance of the topic, shows that he seeks to identify "how much the views expressed by our ancestors in proverbs and sayings on the family budget, income and culture of its distribution, principles of expenditure, etc. are reflected in the modern world, which of the seemingly remnants of the past is still strong in the modern Russian family, or we have completely abandoned the experience of previous generations." The author notes that "during the content analysis, 122 units were selected, which were further grouped into 5 thematic groups: earnings/income, accumulation/preservation, spending/expenditure, socio-economic roles in the family, attitude to finance and general stereotypes concerning the financial and economic sphere of the family." It is noteworthy that, as the author of the reviewed article notes, "stereotypes about socio-economic roles and family status, reflected in proverbs and sayings about two centuries ago, are reflected in modern life." The main conclusion of the article is that "the economic stereotypes that exist among Russian families may be quite accurate "products" of historical memory, but most of them reflect the low level of economic culture of the population and can lead to incorrect decisions in financial management." The article submitted for review is devoted to an urgent topic, is provided with a table, will arouse readers' interest, and its materials can be used both in training courses and as part of the formation of strategies for youth policy and family and childhood policy. In general, in our opinion, the article can be recommended for publication in the journal Sociodynamics.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.