Сакральное в медицине: динамика социокультурных смыслов

Максименко Людмила Александровна

doi:10.7256/2409-7144.2016.10.2076


	Journal Menu > Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium


	Journals in science databases


	About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!

При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.

По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents

Sociodynamics

Reference:

Maxsimenko L.A. — Sacral in medicine: dynamics of sociocultural meanings // Sociodynamics. – 2016. – № 10. – P. 63 - 69. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.10.2076 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=20765

Sacral in medicine: dynamics of sociocultural meanings

Maxsimenko Liudmila Aleksandrovna

Doctor of Philosophy

Professor, the department of Philosophy and Socio-Humanitarian Sciences, Omsk State Medical University

644099, Russia, Omsk, Lenina Street 12

msw60@yandex.ru

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7144.2016.10.2076

Review date:

17-10-2016

Publish date:

31-10-2016

Abstract.

The subject of this research is the meanings of medicine as a special sociocultural practice built around the historically original notion of sacral. Being the object of this research, medicine manifests as the phenomenon of European culture, which take its roots in Hippocrates Kos School. The historical dynamic of the “inner core” of medicine as a peculiar sociocultural practice was associated with the global historical trends in the history of the European culture. The article thoroughly examines “what” and “in which way” influenced the tectonic shifts in architectonics of the meanings of its core. The main conclusion of the conducted research consists in establishment of the fact that the meaning of sacral within medical practice was historically connected with the notion of life and tabooing the actions of therapist who endangers the life in any way. The trust to bioethics as the new social institution forms on the basis of juridification of its norms. The idea of humanitarian expertise becomes a “contaminated” Münchhausen trilemma. All of these speaks that the modern Western medicine, being in the “risk society” or “market” demonstrates the inquiry for the new turn of humanization and proof of its productiveness as the social institution and spiritual area of the culture.
Keywords: human expertise, taboo, Hippocratic Oath, bioethics, sacral, life, culture, medicine, medicalization, social Institutution
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References

1.	Ieger V. Paideiya. Vospitanie antichnogo greka. M.: «Greko-latinskii kabinet»® Yu.A. Shichalina, 1997. S. 76.
2.	Karpov V.P. Gippokrat i Gippokratov sbornik // Gippokrat. Izbrannye knigi. M.: Gos. izd-vo biol. i med. lit-ry, 1936. 736 s.
3.	Veber M. Nauka kak prizvanie i professiya // Veber M. Izbrannye proizvedeniya. M.: Progress, 1990. S. 707-735.
4.	Zabiyako A.P. Sakral'noe // Novaya filosofskaya entsiklopediya. T.3. M.: Mysl', 2010. S. 482-483.
5.	Osyka Ya.M., Mishenin V.Yu. Sakral'noe v sovremennoi kul'ture: podkhody k opredeleniyu i granitsy ponimaniya // Nauchnye vedomosti. Seriya «Filosofiya. Sotsiologiya. Pravo». 2013. № 16(159). Vyp. 25. S. 262-267.
6.	Dyurkgeim E. Elementarnye formy religioznoi zhizni // Mistika. Religiya. Nauka. Klassiki mirovogo religiovedeniya. Antologiya. M.: Kanon+, 1998. S. 87.
7.	Bobrov O.E. Mify i illyuzii klyatvy Gippokrata // URL: http://netoncology.ru/press/1316/1637/
8.	Melik-Gaikazyan I.V., Meshcheryakova T.V. Klyatva Gippokrata: transformatsiya semantiki i vozrozhdenie pragmatiki // ΣΧΟΛΗ (Schole). Filosofskoe antikovedenie i klassicheskaya traditsiya. 2015. № 1. T. 9. S. 35-44.
9.	Keren'i K. Dionis. Proobraz neissyakaemoi zhizni. M.: Ladomir, 2007. 319 s.
10.	Mikhel' D. V. Biomeditsina kak kul'turnaya sistema: kratkii obzor mediko-antropologicheskikh predstavlenii // Gumanitarnye orientiry nauchnogo poznaniya: sbornik statei. MSK.: Izdatel'skii dom «Navigator», 2014. 352. S. 236-243.
11.	Fuko M. Rozhdenie kliniki. M.: Smysl, 1998. 310 s.
12.	Illich I. Predely meditsiny ili Meditsinskaya Nemezida (otryvki iz knigi) // URL:http://www.pubhealth.spb.ru/Illich/index.htm
13.	Mikhel' D.V. Medikalizatsiya kak sotsial'nyi fenomen // Vestnik SGTU. 2011. № 4(60). Vyp. 2. S. 256-263.
14.	Melik-Gaikazyan I.V. Memory turn: proyavlennaya bioetikoi brennost' intellektual'nykh traditsii // Gumanitarnye orientiry nauchnogo poznaniya: sbornik statei. MSK.: Izdatel'skii dom «Navigator», 2014. S. 108-119.
15.	Reznichenko A.A. Dolgii spor o zashchite embrionov // Chelovek. 2011. № 3. S. 125-140.
16.	Yaspers K. Dukhovnaya situatsiya vremeni // Yaspers K. Smysl i naznachenie istorii. M.: Politizdat, 1991. 527 s.
17.	Varava V.V. Nauka kak religiya: paradoks sekulyarnoi kul'tury // Vestnik Russkoi khristianskoi gumanitarnoi akademii. 2008. № 2. T. 9. S. 74-86.
18.	Morua A. O prizvanii vracha // Khimiya i zhizn'. 1979. № 1. S. 79-86.
19.	Gurevich P.S. Vnutr', v bezdonnost' svoei dushi… (Psikhologicheskie problemy sotsial'nogo upravleniya) // Psikhologiya i Psikhotekhnika. 2015. № 8. C. 757-760. DOI: 10.7256/2070-8955.2015.8.16263.

Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.