Статья 'Рефлексия при выборе респондентов в исследованиях общественного мнения' - журнал 'Социодинамика' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Sociodynamics
Reference:

Reflection in term of the selection of respondents in public opinion research

Tsvetkova Marina

PhD student, Department of Theory and History of Political Science, Moscow State University

119991, Lomonosovskii Prospekt, 27/4, Moscow, Russia
futurumi@gmail.com

futurumi@gmail.com
Другие публикации этого автора
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7144.2016.8.18960

Review date:

26-04-2016


Publish date:

02-09-2016


Abstract.

This article reveals the aspects of correctness of sociological research and the importance of reflexive mechanisms in this matter. Sociological research in the way how it is conducted and how it is treated by the institutions of public opinion, do not explain the logic of selection of individual respondents' opinion and explain the logic of aggregating individual opinions (preferences) in the public opinion. Therefore, the methodology of sociological research should be the search and definition of the populations that are at least intuitively have analytical knowledge about the studied issue.The author proposes to use the reflexivity of respondents which imply the ability of the subjective reflection of the object as a criterion for the selection of respondents in the model of sociological studies. Reflexivity is the primary and most specific parameter of the actor in terms of ensuring the adequacy of subjective images of the environment.Thus, the interviewed group of respondents shall be selected by the highest value of the coefficient of reflexivity, as a fundamental capacity of the individual correctly and fully construct external world.

Keywords: relationship between the actors, public opinion, political models, sociological research, social efficienty, moral choice, political actor, reflexive game theory, reflextion, political theory
This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Lapkin V.V., Pantin V.I. Obshchestvennoe mnenie i izmenenie politicheskikh institutov v Rossii i na Zapade // Politicheskie instituty na rubezhe tysyacheletii. XX XXI v. Dubna: Feniks+, 2001. S. 100-135.
2.
Lippman Uolter. Obshchestvennoe mnenie / Per. s angl. T.V. Barchunovoi; redaktory perevoda: Levinson K.A., Petrenko K.V. M.: InstitutFonda “Obshchestvennoe mnenie”, 2004. 384 s.
3.
Shampan' P. Delat' mnenie: novaya politicheskaya igra. M., 1997. 317 s.
4.
Gavra D.P. Obshchestvennoe mnenie i vlast': rezhimy i mekhanizmy vzaimodeistviya // Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial'noi antropologii. 1998. № 4. T. 1. S. 11-13.
5.
Kaneman D. «Dumai medlenno. Reshai bystro». M.: Izd-vo: AST, 2013. 656 s.
6.
Tsaller Dzh. Proiskhozhdenie i priroda obshchestvennogo mneniya. M.: Institut Fonda "Obshchestvennoe mnenie" 2004. 560 s.
7.
Errou K.Dzh. Kollektivnyi vybor i individual'nye tsennosti (angl. Social Choice and Individual Values, 1951) M.: GU VShE, 2004. 204 s.
8.
Levada Yu. Chelovek nedovol'nyi? // Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya. 2006. № 5(85). S. 12-17.
9.
Lippman U. Obshchestvennoe mnenie / Per. s angl. T.V. Barchunovoi; redaktory perevoda: Levinson K.A., Petrenko K.V. M.: InstitutFonda “Obshchestvennoe mnenie”, 2004. 384 s.
10.
Sharov A.S. Ontologiya refleksii: priroda, funktsii i mekhanizmy // Refleksivnyi podkhod: ot metodologii k praktike / Pod red. V.E. Lepskogo. M.: Kogito-tsentr, 2009. S. 112-132.
11.
Karpov A.V. Refleksivnost' kak psikhicheskoe svoistvo i metodika ee diagnostiki // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2003. T. 24. № 5. S. 45-57.
12.
Lefevr V.A., Smolyan G.L. Algebra konflikta. 4-e izd. M.: Knizhnyi dom «Librokom», 2010. 72 s.
13.
Anan'ev B.G. Chelovek kak predmet poznaniya. SPb.: Piter, 2001. 288 s.
14.
Lefevr V.A. Konfliktuyushchie struktury. M.: Sovetskoe radio, 1973. 158 s.
15.
Levada Yu.A. Ishchem cheloveka: sotsiologicheskie ocherki 2000-2005. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo, 2006. 384 s.
16.
Nureev R.M. Teoriya obshchestvennogo vybora. Kurs lektsii: Uch. posobie dlya vuzov. M.: GU VShE, 2005. 531 s.
17.
Tard G. Mnenie i tolpa // Psikhologiya tolp. M.: Institut psikhologii RAN, Izdatel'stvo «KSP+», 1999. 416 s.
18.
Tsvetkova M.V. Analiticheskie aspekty politicheskikh predstavlenii grazhdan v izbiratel'nom protsesse. Materialy Mezhdunarodnogo molodezhnogo nauchnogo foruma «LOMONOSOV-2012» / Otv. red. A.I. Andreev, A.V. Andriyanov, E.A. Antipov, K.K. Andreev, M.V. Chistyakova. [Elektronnyi resurs] M.: MAKS Press, 2012. S. 54.
19.
Tsvetkova M.V. Refleksivnye mekhanizmy sub''ektnykh otnoshenii // Politika i obshchestvo, RAN institut sotsial'no-politicheskikh issledovanii, «Nota Bene». 2014. № 4(112). S. 470-479.
20.
Speier H. Historical Development of Public Opinion. American Journal of Sociology, 1950. vol. 55. № 4. p. 376-388.
21.
Tsvetkova M.V. Voprosy refleksivnogo vybora sub''ektov sotsial'noi politiki // Sotsiodinamika. 2016. № 3. C. 23-29. DOI: 10.7256/2409-7144.2016.3.17879. URL: http://www.e-notabene.ru/pr/article_17879.html
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website