по
Police and Investigative Activity
12+
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > List of peer reviewers > Review procedure > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Legal information
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Journal "Police and Investigative Activity" > Contents of Issue № 02/2018
This issue is currently being formed. All articles presented on this page have already been included in this issue, are considered published, and will remain unchanged in the final version of the issue along with other metadata of the articles.
Учредитель: Даниленко Василий Иванович, w.danilenko@nbpublish.com
Главный редактор: Куракин Алексей Валентинович, доктор юридических наук, kurakinaleksey@gmail.com
Contents of Issue № 02/2018
The police and criminal procedure
Maximov O. - Individual Status of a Participant in a Criminal Case as an Essential Condition for Complete Criminal Procedure Activity pp. 1-8

DOI:
10.25136/2409-7810.2018.2.26027

Abstract: The article is devoted to particular issues related to the gaps in the legal regulation of the procedural status held by criminal procedure participants. The object of the research is the law enforcement activity performed by preliminary investigation authorities and courts to ensure the rights and legal interests of criminal procedure participants. The subject of the research is the combination of constitutional and criminal procedure laws that regulate the order of defining a procedural status of a participant, practical implementation of these laws and theoretically based positions of criminal procedure researchers regarding the issues arising in the process of defining a procedural status. In his research Maksimov applies general and special research methods, in particular, structured system approach, comparison, generalisation and legal logical analysis. As a result of the research, the author of the article defines a number of topical issues that may arise in the process of defining provisions regulating the role of a person in the criminal procedure law. The author concludes that it is unacceptable to replace a particular procedural status of a criminal procedure participant with an optional scope of rights. The author also offers recommendations aimed at improving the criminal procedure laws and law-enforcement practice. 
Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website