по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Peer-review in 24 hours: How do we do it? > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Publication in 72 hours: How do we do it? > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
Police and Investigative Activity
Reference:

The limits of investigator’s mandates: criminal procedure compliance guarantee or archaism?
Ignatova Ol'ga Nikolaevna

Head of the Second Data Analytics Department of the Central Investigative Board of the Head Department of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia

125009, Russia, Moskva oblast', g. Moscow, ul. Nikitskii Pereulok, 3

oignatova6@mvd.ru

Abstract.

The recent change of the nature of crime and the necessity to improve legal investigation instruments have caused essential quantitative and qualitative transformation of the institution of mandates. It has revealed some problem issues connected with the limits of such a delegation of investigator’s authority. Obviously, there are procedural powers which can’t be delegated. According to the law,  formulation of proceeding decisions is one of the powers that can’t be delegated. However, a necessity to urgently formulate a procedural decision as the result of legal investigative activities based on an investigator’s mandate can occur. The purpose of this research is to define the criteria of observation of the limits of investigator’s mandate as a way of delegating procedural authorities. The research methodology is based on the dialectical method of scientific cognition, the comparative-legal, logical-analytical, formal-logical and system-structural methods of studying legal phenomena and processes in the field of criminal procedure. The author’s particularly important contribution is the analysis of the compliance of the formalization of the institution of investigator’s mandate with the requirements of the modern investigative practice. The article considers the types of investigator’s mandates, analyzes the existing scientific opinions on this issue, gives examples of errors of law and legal gaps. 
 

Keywords: investigations, body inquiries, investigator, delegation of authority, the authority to proceedings, limits the Commission of the investigator, order of the investigator, the subjects of delegation, subject delegate, admissible evidence

DOI:

10.25136/2409-7810.2019.3.30641

Article was received:

07-09-2019


Review date:

06-09-2019


Publish date:

22-09-2019


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Ignatova O. N. Osnovnye tendentsii razvitiya instituta porucheniya sledovatelya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve/Aktual'nye problemy predvaritel'nogo sledstviya doznaniya v sovremennykh usloviyakh razvitiya ugolovno-protsessual'nogo zakonodatel'stva: nauchnoe elektronnoe izdanie – M.: Moskovskii universitet MVD Rossii im. V.Ya. Kikotya, 2018. s. 244.
2.
Volynskii R. F., Volynskii V. V. Novyi UPK Ukrainy – otvet na vyzovy sovremennoi prestupnosti ili…?//Rossiiskii sledovatel'. 2013. № 5. s. 39-43.
3.
Internet-resurs Sudebnye i normativnye akty RF (SudAkt)/ https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/AJQx3r1yjcX/
4.
Mikhailov A. I. Otdel'noe poruchenie sledovatelya. M. 1971, s. 12.
5.
Nauchno-prakticheskii kommentarii k Ugolovno-protsessual'nomu kodeksu RSFSR. Izd-e 2, pererab. i dop./Pod redaktsiei V. M. Lebedeva, s. 243.
6.
Lukovnikov G. D. Organy doznaniya v sisteme dosudebnogo proizvodstva po ugolovnym delam. Diss… k.yu.n. M. 1999, s. 46.
7.
Bykov V. M. Psikhologicheskie aspekty vzaimodeistviya sledovatelya i organa doznaniya. Omsk. 1976. s. 47.
8.
Esina A. S. K voprosu ob ispolnenii porucheniya sledovatelya na proizvodstvo sledstvennykh deistvii. Vestnik Moskovskogo universiteta MVD Rossii № 3, 2011. s. 129.
9.
Golovko L.V. Kurs ugolovnogo protsessa / Pod red. d.yu.n., prof. L.V. Golovko. - 2-e izd., ispr. - M.: Statut, 2017, s. 16-17.
10.
Zakharova V.O. Ispol'zovanie instrumentov delegirovaniya v sledstvennoi deyatel'nosti (na primere razvitiya instituta sledstvennykh poruchenii)/Rassledovanie prestuplenii: problemy i puti ikh resheniya/Moskovskaya akademiya Sledstvennogo komiteta RF, № 1(7), 2015. – S. 178.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website