по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial collegium > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Open access publishing costs > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

Публикация за 72 часа - теперь это реальность!
При необходимости издательство предоставляет авторам услугу сверхсрочной полноценной публикации. Уже через 72 часа статья появляется в числе опубликованных на сайте издательства с DOI и номерами страниц.
По первому требованию предоставляем все подтверждающие публикацию документы!
MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
The problems of multiple crimes qualification
Dosaeva Glera Suleimanovna

PhD in Law

Associate Professor at Russian University of Justice (Rostov branch), Department of criminal law

344038, Russia, Rostov-On-Don, ul. Prospekt Lenina, 66

rostfrap1@list.ru

Abstract.

It is noted in the article that qualification of a crime is the establishing of the features of the act committed to the elements of a crime as it is provided by the criminal code of the Russian Federation. Some questions of multiple crimes qualification are connected with the consideration of the guilty person’s activity as a process, developing in time and space. Qualification, as a part of the competent officials’ or judges’ work on the criminal law application, is a cognitive process of a law enforcer, which includes the establishing of the features of the act committed to the elements of a crime as it is provided by a legislator. The methodology of the article consists of the up-to-date achievements of epistemology. The author uses the theoretical and general philosophical methods (dialectics, the system approach, analysis, synthesis, analogy, deduction, observation, modeling), the traditional juridical methods (formal-logical), and the methods, which are used in special sociological research (the statistical method, expert evaluations, etc.). The author comes to the conclusion that the result of such establishing is a legal evaluation of the act committed. The subject of the research, relating to multiple crimes, is based in this methodology.

Keywords: qualification, law, act, crime, multiple crime, corpus delicti, problem, responsibility, court, judge

DOI:

10.7256/2409-7810.2014.3.13925

Article was received:

06-12-2014


Review date:

07-12-2014


Publish date:

26-12-2014


This article written in Russian. You can find full text of article in Russian here .

References
1.
Obzor zakonodatel'stva i sudebnoi praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii za 2 kvartal 2007 goda (Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 771P06 po delu Pozhilova, Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 167P07 po delu Zhemchugova) // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2007. № 11; Obzor sudebnoi praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii za 2 kvartal 2004 goda (Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 361p04pr po delu Kaisina) // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2005. № 1
2.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2002. № 5 .
3.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2012. № 4.
4.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2008. № 2
5.
Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2003. № 2.
6.
Obzor zakonodatel'stva i sudebnoi praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda Rossiiskoi Federatsii za tretii kvartal 2007 goda (Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 251-P07po delu Sviridova) // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2008. № 2
7.
Romanyuk S.N. Slozhnye edinichnye prestupleniya. Avtoreferat diss. … kand. yurid. nauk. Tyumen', 2008. S. 7, 17 – 18.
8.
Chikin D.S. Slozhnye edinichnye prestupleniya (ugolovno-pravovaya kharakteristika, problemy kvalifikatsii i zakonodatel'nogo konstruirovaniya). Dissertatsiya … kand. yurid. nauk. Krasnodar, 2013. S. 92 i sl.
9.
Blagov E.V. Kvalifikatsiya pri sovershenii prestupleniya. M., 2009. S. 99 – 101.
10.
Dagel' P.S. Izbrannye trudy / nauch. red. i predisl. A.I. Korobeev. Vladivostok, 2009. S. 47 – 49
11.
Obzor sudebnoi praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda RF za III kvartal 2000 g. (Opredelenie Voennoi kollegii Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 1-038/2000 po delu Dudareva i dr.) // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2001. № 4
12.
Obzor sudebnoi praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda RF za II kvartal 2006 g. po ugolovnym delam (Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 255-P06 po delu Aleksandrova) // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2007. № 1
13.
Opredelenie Sudebnoi kollegii Verkhovnogo Suda RF po delu Zhgileva i Shcheben'kova // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2004. № 1; Obzor sudebnoi praktiki Verkhovnogo Suda RF za III kvartal 2006 g. po ugolovnym delam (Postanovlenie Prezidiuma Verkhovnogo Suda RF № 215-P06pr po delu Bessonova) // Byulleten' Verkhovnogo Suda RF. 2007. № 6.
14.
Kozlov A.P. Edinichnye prestupleniya: ponyatie, klassifikatsiya, kvalifikatsiya. Krasnoyarsk, 2007. S. 210.
15.
Blagov E.V. Kvalifikatsiya pri sovershenii prestupleniya. M., 2009. S. 99
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.
"History Illustrated" Website