MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
National Security
Reference:
Evseev, V. V.
Concerning Contradictory Policy of the USA
in the Central Asia
// National Security.
2013. № 3.
P. 501-510.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=62822
Evseev, V. V. Concerning Contradictory Policy of the USA
in the Central Asia
Abstract:
The article contains the analysis of the USA
politics in the Central Asia over the last twelve years,
i.e. during the shift from involvement of nearby
states into the ‘war against terrorism’ and attempts
to reformat the region up to using the ‘smart’ force
during Obama’s governance. It is concluded that
during both republican and democratic governance
the USA regional policy has remained contradictory
and inconsistent. It has also been inertial for the
most part and has considered peculiarities of the
Central Asia from the point of view of Afghanistan.
The author describes the process of development
of the bilateral relations between the USA, Russia
(which at first was viewed as the factor allowing
American invasion into the region) and their main
regional partners, Uzbekistan and Kyrgyzstan. It
has been discovered that the ‘war against terrorism
’ did not keep the USA from implementing the
policy of intervention into internal affairs of their
regional partners which could seriously damage the
national security system of the Russian Federation
and create both internal and external threats for it.
Such contradictory external policy of the USA is
most likely t remain in the future, too, which pushes
Russia towards both cooperation and opposition
to national interests of the USA for the purpose of
reinforcement of its own security.
Keywords:
political studies, Asia, USA, partner, Russia, involvement, reformatting, security, interests, region.
This article can be downloaded freely in PDF format for reading. Download article
This article written in Russian. You can find original text of the article here
.
References
1. Braterskiy M.V. SShA i problemnye strany Azii: obosnovanie, vyrabotka i realizatsiya politiki v 1990 – 2005 gg. M.: MONF – Institut SShA i Kanady RAN, 2005 g.
2. Grozin A. Postsovetskaya Tsentral'naya Aziya: novye geopoliticheskie tendentsii i rossiyskie interesy // Tsentr. Aziya i Kavkaz. 2007. № 5.
3. Laumulin M. Interesy Zapada v Tsentral'noy Azii v novykh geopoliticheskikh usloviyakh / Sotrudnichestvo stran Tsentral'noy Azii i SShA po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti v regione. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii // Pod red. M. Ashimbaeva i Dzh. Mennuti. Almaty, 2005.
4. Laumulin M. Tsentral'naya Aziya v zarubezhnoy politologii i mirovoy geopolitike. Tom II: Vneshnyaya politika i strategiya SShA na sovremennom etape i Tsentral'naya Aziya. Almaty: KISI pri prezidente RK, 2006.
5. Omarov N. Na puti k global'noy bezopasnosti: Tsentral'naya Aziya posle 11 sentyabrya 2001 goda. Bishkek, 2002 g.
6. Sultanov B. Partnerskie otnosheniya RK i SShA v bor'be s terrorizmom i ekstremizmom / Sotrudnichestvo stran Tsentral'noy Azii i SShA po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti v regione. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii // Pod red. M. Ashimbaeva i Dzh. Mennuti. Almaty, 2005.
7. Khill F. Pereosmyslenie kompleksnogo podkhoda k bezopasnosti v Tsentral'noy Azii / Sotrudnichestvo stran Tsentral'noy Azii i SShA po obespecheniyu bezopasnosti v regione. Materialy mezhdunarodnoy konferentsii // Pod red. M. Ashimbaeva i Dzh. Mennuti. Almaty, 2005.
8. Davis J., Sweeney M. Central Asia in U.S. Strategy and Operational Planning: Where do we go from here? The Institute for Foreign Policy Analysis. Washington. 2004.
9. Erwin S. War on Terrorism Tests Logisticians’ Skills. National Defense Magazine (July 2002).
10. Haussmann R. Prisoners of Geography. Foreign Policy. Washington, D.C. (Jan.-Feb., 2000).
11. Kazakhstan Building Military Base on Caspian with U.S. Help. Washington D.C. RFE/RL Newsline (Oct. 8, 2003).
12. Starr S.F. A «Greater Central Asia Partnership» for Afghanistan and Its Neighbors Silk Road Paper. Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program – A Joint Transatlantic Research and Policy Center Johns Hopkins University. Washington, D.C. (March 2005).
13. Wall R. MH-47 Crews Detail Conflict’s Exploits, Woes. Aviation Week & Space Technology. Vol. 156. No 15 (Apr. 15, 2002).
14. Wishnick E. Strategic Consequence of the Iraq War: U.S. Security Interests in Central Asia Reassessed. Carlisle, Pa. U.S. Army War College (May 2004)
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|