MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
National Security
Reference:
Yasnosokirskii Y.A.
The correlation between “Responsibility to Protect” and “Humanitarian Intervention” concepts
// National Security.
2015. № 5.
P. 665-671.
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0668.2015.5.16340 URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=16340
Взаимосвязь концепции «Ответственности по защите» с концепцией «гуманитарной интервенции»
Yasnosokirskii Yurii Anatol'evich
PhD in Law
Docent, International Academy of Business and Administration
105215, Russia, Moscow, 11-ya Parkovata Street 44, building #3, unit #58
|
dan63@rambler.ru
|
|
 |
Other publications by this author
|
|
|
DOI: 10.7256/2454-0668.2015.5.16340
Received:
08-09-2015
Published:
1-5-2015
Abstract:
The subject of this research is the “Responsibility to Protect” concept, the key positions of which are contained in its basic document – the Report of the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty (2002). The author interprets the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine as a moderate version of the concept of “Humanitarian Intervention”. The author also conducts a comparative analysis of these two concepts from the perspective of controversy of the legal principle of state sovereignty and the moral imperative of protecting human rights. The scientific novelty consists in revelation of the fact that the concept of “Humanitarian Intervention” contradicts the international law while the “Responsibility to Protect” doctrine, if properly implemented on the international arena, represents the evolutionary development of this direction of international law, which requires devising criteria for practical realization of that concept by the global community.
References
1. Gavrilov V. V. Sootnoshenie i posledovatel'nost' deistvii organov gosudarstva i mezhdunarodnykh organizatsii v ramkakh kontseptsii «otvetstvennost' za zashchitu» v Aziatsko-Tikhookeanskom regione Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2010. № 12 (31). [Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.eurasialaw.ru/index.php?option=com_ content&view=article&id=1611:-l-r-&catid=194:2010-12-27-06-58-52&Itemid=1
2. Gigineishvili M. T. Problema obychno-pravovoi prirody kontseptsii «otvetstvennost' za zashchitu» // Al'manakh sovremennoi nauki i obrazovaniya.-2009.-№ 7 (26): v 2-kh ch.-Ch. I.-C. 31-33.
3. Gumanitarnaya interventsiya [Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gumanitarnaya_interventsiya.
4. Doklad gruppy vysokogo urovnya po ugrozam, vyzovam i peremenam [Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.un.org/russian/secureworld/a59-565.
5. Doklad Mezhdunarodnoi komissii po vmeshatel'stvu i gosudarstvennomu suverenitetu [Elektronnyi resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://daccess-dds-ny.un.org/doc/UNDOC/GEN/N02/525/72/IMG/N0252572.pdf.
6. Itogovyi dokument Vsemirnogo sammita 2005 goda [Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.un.org/ru/documents/decl_ conv/declarations/outcome2005.shtml
7. Kotlyar V. S. Kontseptsiya otvetstvennosti za zashchitu kak proekt kodeksa provedeniya gumanitarnykh interventsii // Mezhdunarodnoe publichnoe i chastnoe pravo.-2005.-№ 3. [Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.lawmix.ru/comm/776.
8. Krylov N. B. Gumanitarnaya interventsiya: pravo ili bespravie? // Evraziiskii yuridicheskii zhurnal. 2012. № 10 (53). [Elektronnyi resurs].-Rezhim dostupa: http://www.eurasialegal.info/index.php?option=com_ content&view=article&id=1600:2012-11-15-05-29-25&catid=116:2011-09-19-12-34-31&Itemid=1.
9. Lukashuk I. I. Mezhdunarodnoe pravo. Osobennaya chast'.-M.: Volters-Kluver, 2008. – 544 s.
10. Sazonova K. L. Kontseptsiya «otvetstvennost' za zashchitu» v mirotvorcheskoi deyatel'nosti organizatsii ob''edinennykh natsii // Yuridicheskaya nauka.-2012.-№ 1.-S. 96-101.
11. Evans, G. and M. Sahnoun (2002): ‘The Responsibility to Protect’, in: Foreign Affairs 81(6), pp. 99-110.
12. Huth, K. P. (1998): ‘Major Power Intervention in International Crises, 1918-1988’, in: The Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(6), pp. 744-770.
13. Power, S. (2002): “A Problem from Hell”: America and the Age of Genocide, New York: Basic Books.
14. Ratner, S.R. (2000): ‘Does International Law Matter in Preventing Ethnic Conflict?’, in: New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 32, pp. 591-698.
15. Walzer M. Arguing About War. New Haven. L.: Yale University Press, 2004. P. 74-75.
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
