Статья 'Представления о Враге лиц, различающихся самоэффективностью и самоотношением' - журнал 'Национальная безопасность / nota bene' - NotaBene.ru
по
Journal Menu
> Issues > Rubrics > About journal > Authors > About the Journal > Requirements for publication > Editorial board > Peer-review process > Policy of publication. Aims & Scope. > Article retraction > Ethics > Online First Pre-Publication > Copyright & Licensing Policy > Digital archiving policy > Open Access Policy > Article Processing Charge > Article Identification Policy > Plagiarism check policy > Editorial collegium
Journals in science databases
About the Journal

MAIN PAGE > Back to contents
National Security
Reference:

Представления о Враге лиц, различающихся самоэффективностью и самоотношением

Alperovich Valeriya

PhD in Psychology

Associated Professor at Academy of Psychology and of Pedagogics, Southern Federal University

344065, Russia, Rostovskaya oblast', g. Rostov-Na-Donu, per. Dneprovskii, 116, of. 419

valdmalp@rambler.ru
Other publications by this author
 

 

DOI:

10.7256/2454-0668.2016.2.15608

Received:

17-06-2015


Published:

28-05-2016


Abstract: Abstract: Problem of influence of the self-relation on personal representations of Other as Enemy is touched by us in this article. Research goal was the comparative analysis of psychosocial characteristics of the representations about an Enemy of persons with different characteristics of the self-relation and of the self-efficacy. Psychosocial characteristics of the personal representations about an Enemy, the personal self-relation parameters (intensity of the self-esteem, of the self-sympathy, of the waiting of the Others' positive relation, of the self-interest) and levels of the self-efficacy were the research subject. We applied qualitative and quantitative methods: tests, categorical analysis of representations, statistics (frequencies, cluster analysis, nonparametric test). The results of the study prove that: respondents, perceiving the Enemy as aggressor, manipulator, demonstrate the low levels of the self-efficacy, of the self-interest, of the self-sympathy, of the self-esteem, of the waiting of the Others'relation; respondents, perceiving the Enemy as the subject with alien cognitions and values, demonstrate the upper levels of the self-efficacy, of the self-interest, of the self-sympathy, of the self-esteem, of the waiting of the Others' positive relation. Data supported the hypothesis about the distinctions of personal representations of Enemy depending upon characteristics of the self-relation and of the self-efficacy. The results can be applied to the psychosocial consultation, to the programs of the tolerance’ trainings in the antiterrorist activity.


Keywords:

representations, Enemy, self-relation, self-esteem, self-sympathy, relations system, self-interest, self-efficacy, Other, representations about an Enemy

References
1. Bandura A. Teoriya samoeffektivnosti // Psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2000. T. 21. № 1. S. 4-11.
2. Berns R. Razvitie Ya-kontseptsii i vospitanie. M.: Progress, 1986. 420 s.
3. Gaidar M.I. Lichnostnaya samoeffektivnost' studentov-psikhologov // Rossiiskii psikhologicheskii zhurnal. 2008. T. 5. № 1. S. 75-77.
4. Gordeeva T.O., Shepeleva E.A. Tendernye razlichiya v akademicheskoi i sotsial'noi samoeffektivnosti i koping-strategiyakh u sovremennykh rossiiskikh podro-stkov // Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta im. M.V. Lomonosova. Ser. 14. Psikholo¬giya. 2006. № 3. S. 78-85.
5. Emel'yanova T.P. Konstruirovanie sotsial'nykh predstavlenii v usloviyakh transformatsii rossiiskogo obshchestva. M.: IP RAN, 2006. 400 s.
6. Znakov V.V. Obraz vraga kak psikhologicheskoe osnovanie ponimaniya musul'manskikh terroristov rossiyanami // Voprosy psikhologii. 2012. № 2. S. 23-35.
7. Kozyrev G.I. «Vrag» i «Obraz vraga» v obshchestvennykh i politicheskikh otnosheniyakh // Sotsiologicheskie issledovaniya. 2008. № 1. S. 31-39.
8. Kolyshko A.M. Psikhologiya samootnosheniya. Grodno: Izd-vo GrGU, 2004. 102 s.
9. Krichevskii R.L. Samoeffektivnost' i akmeologicheskii podkhod k issledovaniyu lichnosti // Akmeologiya. 2001. № 1. S. 47-52.
10. Labunskaya V.A. Obraz vraga v mezhlichnostnom obshchenii // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo. 2013. № 3. S. 52-65.
11. Mititsina E.A., Ivanova N.V. Kar'ernye orientatsii spetsialistov s vysokim urovnem samoeffektivnosti v professional'noi deyatel'nosti // Vestnik Pskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. Sotsial'no-gumanitarnye i psikhologo-pedagogicheskie nauki. 2008. № 5. S. 121-125.
12. Pantileev S.R. Samootnoshenie kak emotsional'no-otsenochnaya sistema. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1991. 108 s.
13. Stolin V.V. Samosoznanie lichnosti. M.: Izd-vo MGU, 1983. 286 s.
14. Tulinova D.N. Predstavleniya o Vrage i Druge v svyazi s otnosheniem k zhizni na razlichnykh etapakh. Dis. …kand. psikhol. nauk. Rostov-na-Donu, 2005. 288 s.
15. Chesnokova I.I. Osobennosti razvitiya samosoznaniya v ontogeneze // Printsip razvitiya v psikhologii. M.: Nauka, 1978. S. 316-366.
16. Shirkov Yu.E. Strategii samokategorizatsii v sisteme predstavlenii o «svoikh» i «chuzhikh». Avtoref. dis. … kand. psikhol. nauk. M., 2009. 29 s.
17. Shkurko T.A. Otnosheniya k «svoim/chuzhim», «blizkim/dalekim» zhitelei gorodov raznogo tipa // Sotsial'naya psikhologiya i obshchestvo. 2013. № 4. S. 81-94.
Link to this article

You can simply select and copy link from below text field.


Other our sites:
Official Website of NOTA BENE / Aurora Group s.r.o.