|
MAIN PAGE
> Back to contents
International Law and International Organizations
Reference:
Gurbanov, R.A.
Interaction of the judicial bodies of the EU member states with the judicial bodies
of the EU
// International Law and International Organizations.
2011. № 3.
P. 128-143.
URL: https://en.nbpublish.com/library_read_article.php?id=58566
Gurbanov, R.A. Interaction of the judicial bodies of the EU member states with the judicial bodies
of the EU
Abstract:
This article treats the question of cooperation between judicial bodies of EU member States and judicial
bodies of European Union. The author considers that a preliminary ruling is a mechanism of direct and intense
cooperation between the courts of a European Union member States and EU Court of justice. The author
also points out the indirect ways of cooperation between these judicial bodies, which is accomplished by
infl uence of a case law of Court of Justice of the European Union on judicial bodies of EU Member States.
Keywords:
European Union, Court of Justice of the European Union, judicial bodies of EU Member States, preliminary ruling, case law, case, European law, direct cooperation, indirect cooperation
References
1. Alekseevskaya, E.I. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie problemy proizvodstva v sude nadzornoy in-
2. stantsii// Diss. na soiskanie uch. step. k.yu.n. Moskva. 2008.
3. A. Arndt, Selbständigkeit des Bundesverfassungsgericht, NJW, 1965.
4. E. Benda, E. Klein, Verfassungsprozessrecht, Mueller Verl., 2e éd. 2001.
5. R. Fleury, Verfassungsprozessrecht, Luchterhand, 6e éd., 2004,.
6. J. Gerkrath, L’emergence d’un droit constitutionnel pour l’Europe: Modes de formation et sources d’inspiration
7. de la constitution des Communautes et de l’Union europeenne (Etudes europeennes), Editions
8. de l’Universite de Bruxelles, 1997.
9. F. Jacobs, The Role of National Courts and the European Court in Ensuring the Uniform Application of
10. Community Law: Is a New Approach Needed, in Mél. F. Capotorti, Giuffre, 1999, vol. II.
11. K.P.E. Lasok, T. Millett, Judicial control in the EU. Procedures and principles, Richmond Law and Tax,
12. 2009.
13. R. Lecourt, Le juge national devant le Marché commun, IUHEI, 1970, p. 51
14. F. Lichère, L. Potvin-Solis, A. Raynouard, Le dialogue entre les juges européens et nationaux: incantation
15. ou réalité? Bruylant, 2004.
16. J. Pertek, La pratique du renvoi préjudiciel en droit communautaire, Litec, 2001, n° 324.
17. Ch. Pestalozza, Verfassungsprozessrecht, 3e éd., 1991.
18. H. Schermers, D. Waelbroeck, Judicial Protection in the European Union. N. Y., 2001.
19. K. Schlaich, S. Korioth, Das Bundesverfassungsgericht. Stellung, Verfahren, Entscheidungen, Verlag C.
20. H. Beck, München, 2004
21. J. Ziller et J. Lotarski, Institutions et organes judiciaries, in B. De Witte (éd.), Ten Refl ections on the
22. Constitutional treaty for Europe, EUI 2003,
Link to this article
You can simply select and copy link from below text field.
|
|
